Developing a national mentorship scheme to enhance the contribution of clinical academics to health care

Geraldine Byrne, Annie Topping, Sally Kendall, Berenice Golding

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To provide a template for developing a national mentoring scheme to enhance the contribution practitioner researchers can make to the quality of health care in England. Background: The authors describe the background to and organisation of a mentorship scheme to support those awarded National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) fellowships as part of the Clinical Academic Training (CAT) scheme for nurses, midwives and the allied health professionals in England. Data sources: The paper draws on relevant policy documents to explain the development of the NIHR mentorship scheme. It also reviews the literature regarding mentoring in nursing and the health professions. Review methods: The review was conducted systematically using keywords: mentorship, clinical academic careers, research, nursing research, clinical academic careers, evidence, health care. Databases included PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar. An integrated approach was adopted. Discussion: Kirkpatrick's (2006) four-level evaluation model provided a framework to evaluate the scheme and explore the role of mentorship in supporting NIHR fellows. Preliminary findings from baseline and end-of-year evaluations revealed mentees' expectations of mentorship and its effects on their professional development. Developing a career as a clinical academic can be a challenging journey for novice researchers. In addition, there is a vital need to integrate research with clinical practice. Conclusion: Mentoring appears valuable in enabling NIHR fellows to navigate the challenges of demanding clinical roles in England's National Health Service while making a high-level contribution to research. The importance of preparing mentors for their role is well documented in the literature but mentees also need preparation and guidance to manage this important relationship. Implications for research/practice: The evaluation has implications for embedding similar schemes across nursing, midwifery and the allied health professions to promote capacity and leadership in clinical academic careers. This study has uniquely identified the need to support mentees as well as mentors in such programmes to ensure the optimal benefit of the programme reaches all participants.

LanguageEnglish
Pages23-28
Number of pages6
Volume22
No.2
Specialist publicationNurse researcher
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Mentors
Delivery of Health Care
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Research
England
Health Occupations
Clinical Nursing Research
Nursing
Research Personnel
Nurse Midwives
Allied Health Personnel
Quality of Health Care
Information Storage and Retrieval
National Health Programs
Midwifery
PubMed
Teaching
Organizations
Databases

Cite this

Byrne, Geraldine ; Topping, Annie ; Kendall, Sally ; Golding, Berenice. / Developing a national mentorship scheme to enhance the contribution of clinical academics to health care. In: Nurse researcher. 2014 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 23-28.
@misc{1fe42ff438844c62aec07ef9ad38194c,
title = "Developing a national mentorship scheme to enhance the contribution of clinical academics to health care",
abstract = "Aim: To provide a template for developing a national mentoring scheme to enhance the contribution practitioner researchers can make to the quality of health care in England. Background: The authors describe the background to and organisation of a mentorship scheme to support those awarded National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) fellowships as part of the Clinical Academic Training (CAT) scheme for nurses, midwives and the allied health professionals in England. Data sources: The paper draws on relevant policy documents to explain the development of the NIHR mentorship scheme. It also reviews the literature regarding mentoring in nursing and the health professions. Review methods: The review was conducted systematically using keywords: mentorship, clinical academic careers, research, nursing research, clinical academic careers, evidence, health care. Databases included PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar. An integrated approach was adopted. Discussion: Kirkpatrick's (2006) four-level evaluation model provided a framework to evaluate the scheme and explore the role of mentorship in supporting NIHR fellows. Preliminary findings from baseline and end-of-year evaluations revealed mentees' expectations of mentorship and its effects on their professional development. Developing a career as a clinical academic can be a challenging journey for novice researchers. In addition, there is a vital need to integrate research with clinical practice. Conclusion: Mentoring appears valuable in enabling NIHR fellows to navigate the challenges of demanding clinical roles in England's National Health Service while making a high-level contribution to research. The importance of preparing mentors for their role is well documented in the literature but mentees also need preparation and guidance to manage this important relationship. Implications for research/practice: The evaluation has implications for embedding similar schemes across nursing, midwifery and the allied health professions to promote capacity and leadership in clinical academic careers. This study has uniquely identified the need to support mentees as well as mentors in such programmes to ensure the optimal benefit of the programme reaches all participants.",
keywords = "Clinical academic careers, Evidence, Health care, Mentorship, Nursing research",
author = "Geraldine Byrne and Annie Topping and Sally Kendall and Berenice Golding",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.7748/nr.22.2.23.e1288",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "23--28",
journal = "Nurse researcher",
issn = "1351-5578",
publisher = "RCN Publishing Company",

}

Developing a national mentorship scheme to enhance the contribution of clinical academics to health care. / Byrne, Geraldine; Topping, Annie; Kendall, Sally; Golding, Berenice.

In: Nurse researcher, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2014, p. 23-28.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

TY - GEN

T1 - Developing a national mentorship scheme to enhance the contribution of clinical academics to health care

AU - Byrne, Geraldine

AU - Topping, Annie

AU - Kendall, Sally

AU - Golding, Berenice

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Aim: To provide a template for developing a national mentoring scheme to enhance the contribution practitioner researchers can make to the quality of health care in England. Background: The authors describe the background to and organisation of a mentorship scheme to support those awarded National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) fellowships as part of the Clinical Academic Training (CAT) scheme for nurses, midwives and the allied health professionals in England. Data sources: The paper draws on relevant policy documents to explain the development of the NIHR mentorship scheme. It also reviews the literature regarding mentoring in nursing and the health professions. Review methods: The review was conducted systematically using keywords: mentorship, clinical academic careers, research, nursing research, clinical academic careers, evidence, health care. Databases included PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar. An integrated approach was adopted. Discussion: Kirkpatrick's (2006) four-level evaluation model provided a framework to evaluate the scheme and explore the role of mentorship in supporting NIHR fellows. Preliminary findings from baseline and end-of-year evaluations revealed mentees' expectations of mentorship and its effects on their professional development. Developing a career as a clinical academic can be a challenging journey for novice researchers. In addition, there is a vital need to integrate research with clinical practice. Conclusion: Mentoring appears valuable in enabling NIHR fellows to navigate the challenges of demanding clinical roles in England's National Health Service while making a high-level contribution to research. The importance of preparing mentors for their role is well documented in the literature but mentees also need preparation and guidance to manage this important relationship. Implications for research/practice: The evaluation has implications for embedding similar schemes across nursing, midwifery and the allied health professions to promote capacity and leadership in clinical academic careers. This study has uniquely identified the need to support mentees as well as mentors in such programmes to ensure the optimal benefit of the programme reaches all participants.

AB - Aim: To provide a template for developing a national mentoring scheme to enhance the contribution practitioner researchers can make to the quality of health care in England. Background: The authors describe the background to and organisation of a mentorship scheme to support those awarded National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) fellowships as part of the Clinical Academic Training (CAT) scheme for nurses, midwives and the allied health professionals in England. Data sources: The paper draws on relevant policy documents to explain the development of the NIHR mentorship scheme. It also reviews the literature regarding mentoring in nursing and the health professions. Review methods: The review was conducted systematically using keywords: mentorship, clinical academic careers, research, nursing research, clinical academic careers, evidence, health care. Databases included PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar. An integrated approach was adopted. Discussion: Kirkpatrick's (2006) four-level evaluation model provided a framework to evaluate the scheme and explore the role of mentorship in supporting NIHR fellows. Preliminary findings from baseline and end-of-year evaluations revealed mentees' expectations of mentorship and its effects on their professional development. Developing a career as a clinical academic can be a challenging journey for novice researchers. In addition, there is a vital need to integrate research with clinical practice. Conclusion: Mentoring appears valuable in enabling NIHR fellows to navigate the challenges of demanding clinical roles in England's National Health Service while making a high-level contribution to research. The importance of preparing mentors for their role is well documented in the literature but mentees also need preparation and guidance to manage this important relationship. Implications for research/practice: The evaluation has implications for embedding similar schemes across nursing, midwifery and the allied health professions to promote capacity and leadership in clinical academic careers. This study has uniquely identified the need to support mentees as well as mentors in such programmes to ensure the optimal benefit of the programme reaches all participants.

KW - Clinical academic careers

KW - Evidence

KW - Health care

KW - Mentorship

KW - Nursing research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922394696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7748/nr.22.2.23.e1288

DO - 10.7748/nr.22.2.23.e1288

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 23

EP - 28

JO - Nurse researcher

T2 - Nurse researcher

JF - Nurse researcher

SN - 1351-5578

ER -