Developing staff in further education

Discourse, learners and practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article examines the constructions of learners and learning held by staff development officers working in further education colleges located in the English Midlands. In addition the article draws upon their understanding of the developmental needs of lecturers working in the sector. In the case of both learners and lecturers there is a tendency for staff development officers to individualise the process of learning. This rests alongside a predisposition to construct the learner as an object upon which interventions are made. The article argues this tendency is encouraged by the performative context in which colleges are placed. It is however suggested that alongside these processes lies the embryonic development of alternatives that prefigure progressive practice, characterised by dialogue and deliberation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-352
Number of pages14
JournalResearch in Post-Compulsory Education
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

further education
staff
discourse
university teacher
deliberation
learning
dialogue

Cite this

@article{5d86eaedf8ba4d458daa8024738e47e4,
title = "Developing staff in further education: Discourse, learners and practice",
abstract = "The article examines the constructions of learners and learning held by staff development officers working in further education colleges located in the English Midlands. In addition the article draws upon their understanding of the developmental needs of lecturers working in the sector. In the case of both learners and lecturers there is a tendency for staff development officers to individualise the process of learning. This rests alongside a predisposition to construct the learner as an object upon which interventions are made. The article argues this tendency is encouraged by the performative context in which colleges are placed. It is however suggested that alongside these processes lies the embryonic development of alternatives that prefigure progressive practice, characterised by dialogue and deliberation.",
author = "James Avis",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13596740200200135",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "339--352",
journal = "Research in Post-Compulsory Education",
issn = "1359-6748",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Developing staff in further education : Discourse, learners and practice. / Avis, James.

In: Research in Post-Compulsory Education, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.01.2002, p. 339-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing staff in further education

T2 - Discourse, learners and practice

AU - Avis, James

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - The article examines the constructions of learners and learning held by staff development officers working in further education colleges located in the English Midlands. In addition the article draws upon their understanding of the developmental needs of lecturers working in the sector. In the case of both learners and lecturers there is a tendency for staff development officers to individualise the process of learning. This rests alongside a predisposition to construct the learner as an object upon which interventions are made. The article argues this tendency is encouraged by the performative context in which colleges are placed. It is however suggested that alongside these processes lies the embryonic development of alternatives that prefigure progressive practice, characterised by dialogue and deliberation.

AB - The article examines the constructions of learners and learning held by staff development officers working in further education colleges located in the English Midlands. In addition the article draws upon their understanding of the developmental needs of lecturers working in the sector. In the case of both learners and lecturers there is a tendency for staff development officers to individualise the process of learning. This rests alongside a predisposition to construct the learner as an object upon which interventions are made. The article argues this tendency is encouraged by the performative context in which colleges are placed. It is however suggested that alongside these processes lies the embryonic development of alternatives that prefigure progressive practice, characterised by dialogue and deliberation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39449097353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13596740200200135

DO - 10.1080/13596740200200135

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 339

EP - 352

JO - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

JF - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

SN - 1359-6748

IS - 3

ER -