Dialogue of the Deaf

Listening on Twitter and Democratic Responsiveness during the 2015 South African State of the Nation Address

Lone Sorensen, Heather Ford, Walid Al-Saqaf, Tanja Bosch

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter investigates the use of social media as a channel of communication between citizens and government. It draws on the concept of ‘listening’ in democratic communication (Couldry, N., Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2010; Dobson, A., Listening for Democracy: Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). In the run-up to the 2015 State of the Nation Address, the South African presidency conducted a listening exercise on Twitter, which failed on all counts. Combining quantitative and qualitative analyses of Twitter conversations, the chapter evaluates the quality of listening and identifies the reasons for the collapse of the conversation. The findings suggest that while poorly performed listening campaigns can result in spiralling frustration among citizens, social media platforms like Twitter can also provide opportunities for governments to listen in a manner that serves a more positive relationship with citizens.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMedia, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change
Subtitle of host publicationCase Studies on Contested Transitions
EditorsKatrin Voltmer, Christian Christensen, Nicole Stremlau, Irene Neverla, Barbara Thomass, Neboša Vladisavljevic, Herman Wasserman
Place of PublicationBasingstoke
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter10
Pages229-254
Number of pages26
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9783030167486
ISBN (Print)9783030167479, 303016747X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

twitter
dialogue
citizen
social media
conversation
communication
frustration
neoliberalism
reconciliation
campaign
democracy
politics

Cite this

Sorensen, L., Ford, H., Al-Saqaf, W., & Bosch, T. (2019). Dialogue of the Deaf: Listening on Twitter and Democratic Responsiveness during the 2015 South African State of the Nation Address. In K. Voltmer, C. Christensen, N. Stremlau, I. Neverla, B. Thomass, N. Vladisavljevic, & H. Wasserman (Eds.), Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change: Case Studies on Contested Transitions (1 ed., pp. 229-254). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_10
Sorensen, Lone ; Ford, Heather ; Al-Saqaf, Walid ; Bosch, Tanja. / Dialogue of the Deaf : Listening on Twitter and Democratic Responsiveness during the 2015 South African State of the Nation Address. Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change: Case Studies on Contested Transitions. editor / Katrin Voltmer ; Christian Christensen ; Nicole Stremlau ; Irene Neverla ; Barbara Thomass ; Neboša Vladisavljevic ; Herman Wasserman. 1. ed. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. pp. 229-254
@inbook{8b68bc6484f04e6e8ad7559ffea1a244,
title = "Dialogue of the Deaf: Listening on Twitter and Democratic Responsiveness during the 2015 South African State of the Nation Address",
abstract = "This chapter investigates the use of social media as a channel of communication between citizens and government. It draws on the concept of ‘listening’ in democratic communication (Couldry, N., Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2010; Dobson, A., Listening for Democracy: Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). In the run-up to the 2015 State of the Nation Address, the South African presidency conducted a listening exercise on Twitter, which failed on all counts. Combining quantitative and qualitative analyses of Twitter conversations, the chapter evaluates the quality of listening and identifies the reasons for the collapse of the conversation. The findings suggest that while poorly performed listening campaigns can result in spiralling frustration among citizens, social media platforms like Twitter can also provide opportunities for governments to listen in a manner that serves a more positive relationship with citizens.",
keywords = "Listening, political communication, democracy, New Media",
author = "Lone Sorensen and Heather Ford and Walid Al-Saqaf and Tanja Bosch",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_10",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783030167479",
pages = "229--254",
editor = "Katrin Voltmer and Christian Christensen and Nicole Stremlau and Irene Neverla and Barbara Thomass and Neboša Vladisavljevic and Herman Wasserman",
booktitle = "Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
edition = "1",

}

Sorensen, L, Ford, H, Al-Saqaf, W & Bosch, T 2019, Dialogue of the Deaf: Listening on Twitter and Democratic Responsiveness during the 2015 South African State of the Nation Address. in K Voltmer, C Christensen, N Stremlau, I Neverla, B Thomass, N Vladisavljevic & H Wasserman (eds), Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change: Case Studies on Contested Transitions. 1 edn, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 229-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_10

Dialogue of the Deaf : Listening on Twitter and Democratic Responsiveness during the 2015 South African State of the Nation Address. / Sorensen, Lone; Ford, Heather; Al-Saqaf, Walid; Bosch, Tanja.

Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change: Case Studies on Contested Transitions. ed. / Katrin Voltmer; Christian Christensen; Nicole Stremlau; Irene Neverla; Barbara Thomass; Neboša Vladisavljevic; Herman Wasserman. 1. ed. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. p. 229-254.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Dialogue of the Deaf

T2 - Listening on Twitter and Democratic Responsiveness during the 2015 South African State of the Nation Address

AU - Sorensen, Lone

AU - Ford, Heather

AU - Al-Saqaf, Walid

AU - Bosch, Tanja

PY - 2019/9/6

Y1 - 2019/9/6

N2 - This chapter investigates the use of social media as a channel of communication between citizens and government. It draws on the concept of ‘listening’ in democratic communication (Couldry, N., Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2010; Dobson, A., Listening for Democracy: Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). In the run-up to the 2015 State of the Nation Address, the South African presidency conducted a listening exercise on Twitter, which failed on all counts. Combining quantitative and qualitative analyses of Twitter conversations, the chapter evaluates the quality of listening and identifies the reasons for the collapse of the conversation. The findings suggest that while poorly performed listening campaigns can result in spiralling frustration among citizens, social media platforms like Twitter can also provide opportunities for governments to listen in a manner that serves a more positive relationship with citizens.

AB - This chapter investigates the use of social media as a channel of communication between citizens and government. It draws on the concept of ‘listening’ in democratic communication (Couldry, N., Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2010; Dobson, A., Listening for Democracy: Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). In the run-up to the 2015 State of the Nation Address, the South African presidency conducted a listening exercise on Twitter, which failed on all counts. Combining quantitative and qualitative analyses of Twitter conversations, the chapter evaluates the quality of listening and identifies the reasons for the collapse of the conversation. The findings suggest that while poorly performed listening campaigns can result in spiralling frustration among citizens, social media platforms like Twitter can also provide opportunities for governments to listen in a manner that serves a more positive relationship with citizens.

KW - Listening

KW - political communication

KW - democracy

KW - New Media

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_10

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_10

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783030167479

SN - 303016747X

SP - 229

EP - 254

BT - Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change

A2 - Voltmer, Katrin

A2 - Christensen, Christian

A2 - Stremlau, Nicole

A2 - Neverla, Irene

A2 - Thomass, Barbara

A2 - Vladisavljevic, Neboša

A2 - Wasserman, Herman

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - Basingstoke

ER -

Sorensen L, Ford H, Al-Saqaf W, Bosch T. Dialogue of the Deaf: Listening on Twitter and Democratic Responsiveness during the 2015 South African State of the Nation Address. In Voltmer K, Christensen C, Stremlau N, Neverla I, Thomass B, Vladisavljevic N, Wasserman H, editors, Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change: Case Studies on Contested Transitions. 1 ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2019. p. 229-254 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_10