Different strokes for different folks: Group variation in employee outcomes to human resource management

Kenny Cafferkey, Tony Dundon, Jonathan Winterton, Keith Townsend

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose – Existing research on the relationship between human resources management (HRM) and worker reactions to practices rarely explore differences between occupational classes and their receptiveness to HRM initiatives. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Using data from a single case organization, the authors examine whether HRM practices apply uniformly across distinct occupational groups, and if there are differing impacts by occupational class on commitment, motivation and satisfaction. Findings – Using occupational identity, the results indicate that different groups of employees have varied perceptions of, and reactions to, the same HRM practices. Practical implications – The paper adds that human resource practice application may have a tipping point, after which distinct employee groups require different HR architectural configurations. Social implications – HRM policy and practice may be better tailored to the different specific needs of diverse occupational groups of workers.
Originality/value – The paper argues that existing theory and practice advocating universal or high potential HRM as a route to positive employee outcomes are potentially flawed.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Organizational Effectiveness
Early online date8 Jan 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Employees
Human resource management
Occupational class
Human resource management practices
Workers
Design methodology
Occupational identity
Human resource practices

Cite this

@article{a2a94ffaa60b46368fa8999a49d05f32,
title = "Different strokes for different folks: Group variation in employee outcomes to human resource management",
abstract = "Purpose – Existing research on the relationship between human resources management (HRM) and worker reactions to practices rarely explore differences between occupational classes and their receptiveness to HRM initiatives. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Using data from a single case organization, the authors examine whether HRM practices apply uniformly across distinct occupational groups, and if there are differing impacts by occupational class on commitment, motivation and satisfaction. Findings – Using occupational identity, the results indicate that different groups of employees have varied perceptions of, and reactions to, the same HRM practices. Practical implications – The paper adds that human resource practice application may have a tipping point, after which distinct employee groups require different HR architectural configurations. Social implications – HRM policy and practice may be better tailored to the different specific needs of diverse occupational groups of workers.Originality/value – The paper argues that existing theory and practice advocating universal or high potential HRM as a route to positive employee outcomes are potentially flawed.",
keywords = "occupational identity, employee outcomes, employee motivation, HR performance, occupational class",
author = "Kenny Cafferkey and Tony Dundon and Jonathan Winterton and Keith Townsend",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1108/JOEPP-12-2018-0114",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Effectiveness",
issn = "2051-6614",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

Different strokes for different folks : Group variation in employee outcomes to human resource management. / Cafferkey, Kenny; Dundon, Tony; Winterton, Jonathan; Townsend, Keith.

In: Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 08.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different strokes for different folks

T2 - Group variation in employee outcomes to human resource management

AU - Cafferkey, Kenny

AU - Dundon, Tony

AU - Winterton, Jonathan

AU - Townsend, Keith

PY - 2020/1/8

Y1 - 2020/1/8

N2 - Purpose – Existing research on the relationship between human resources management (HRM) and worker reactions to practices rarely explore differences between occupational classes and their receptiveness to HRM initiatives. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Using data from a single case organization, the authors examine whether HRM practices apply uniformly across distinct occupational groups, and if there are differing impacts by occupational class on commitment, motivation and satisfaction. Findings – Using occupational identity, the results indicate that different groups of employees have varied perceptions of, and reactions to, the same HRM practices. Practical implications – The paper adds that human resource practice application may have a tipping point, after which distinct employee groups require different HR architectural configurations. Social implications – HRM policy and practice may be better tailored to the different specific needs of diverse occupational groups of workers.Originality/value – The paper argues that existing theory and practice advocating universal or high potential HRM as a route to positive employee outcomes are potentially flawed.

AB - Purpose – Existing research on the relationship between human resources management (HRM) and worker reactions to practices rarely explore differences between occupational classes and their receptiveness to HRM initiatives. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Using data from a single case organization, the authors examine whether HRM practices apply uniformly across distinct occupational groups, and if there are differing impacts by occupational class on commitment, motivation and satisfaction. Findings – Using occupational identity, the results indicate that different groups of employees have varied perceptions of, and reactions to, the same HRM practices. Practical implications – The paper adds that human resource practice application may have a tipping point, after which distinct employee groups require different HR architectural configurations. Social implications – HRM policy and practice may be better tailored to the different specific needs of diverse occupational groups of workers.Originality/value – The paper argues that existing theory and practice advocating universal or high potential HRM as a route to positive employee outcomes are potentially flawed.

KW - occupational identity

KW - employee outcomes

KW - employee motivation

KW - HR performance

KW - occupational class

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078871682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JOEPP-12-2018-0114

DO - 10.1108/JOEPP-12-2018-0114

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Organizational Effectiveness

JF - Journal of Organizational Effectiveness

SN - 2051-6614

ER -