Discourse, organisation and the surgical ward round

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The surgical ward round is examined as an organisational strategy entered into by surgeons to enable particular claims about the success of surgery to be validated. The paper reports ethnographic data from UK surgical wards which suggest that surgeons organise the discourse of their interactions with patients around three themes: physiology, wound condition and recovery/discharge. These themes are surgeon‐centred, and are organised to deny patients access to the agenda of these encounters. Within a post‐structuralist and postmodern framework, these strategies of discourse organisation are understood as techniques of power. Surgeons privilege discourses which support their claims to be healers, denying those which focus on the necessary injury which surgical resection causes. The paper argues that the ‘ward round’ is a mythical structure constituted as an organisational strategy to counter challenges from patients to their hegemonic discourse.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-20
Number of pages5
JournalSociology of Health & Illness
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

discourse
Intraoperative Complications
physiology
surgery
privilege
Wounds and Injuries
cause
Surgeons
interaction

Cite this

@article{e606b2bf0d3c4d2a8ec89853ea0499e9,
title = "Discourse, organisation and the surgical ward round",
abstract = "The surgical ward round is examined as an organisational strategy entered into by surgeons to enable particular claims about the success of surgery to be validated. The paper reports ethnographic data from UK surgical wards which suggest that surgeons organise the discourse of their interactions with patients around three themes: physiology, wound condition and recovery/discharge. These themes are surgeon‐centred, and are organised to deny patients access to the agenda of these encounters. Within a post‐structuralist and postmodern framework, these strategies of discourse organisation are understood as techniques of power. Surgeons privilege discourses which support their claims to be healers, denying those which focus on the necessary injury which surgical resection causes. The paper argues that the ‘ward round’ is a mythical structure constituted as an organisational strategy to counter challenges from patients to their hegemonic discourse.",
author = "Fox, {Nicholas J.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9566.ep11343783",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "16--20",
journal = "Sociology of Health and Illness",
issn = "0141-9889",
publisher = "Blackwell Science Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Discourse, organisation and the surgical ward round. / Fox, Nicholas J.

In: Sociology of Health & Illness, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.01.1993, p. 16-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discourse, organisation and the surgical ward round

AU - Fox, Nicholas J.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - The surgical ward round is examined as an organisational strategy entered into by surgeons to enable particular claims about the success of surgery to be validated. The paper reports ethnographic data from UK surgical wards which suggest that surgeons organise the discourse of their interactions with patients around three themes: physiology, wound condition and recovery/discharge. These themes are surgeon‐centred, and are organised to deny patients access to the agenda of these encounters. Within a post‐structuralist and postmodern framework, these strategies of discourse organisation are understood as techniques of power. Surgeons privilege discourses which support their claims to be healers, denying those which focus on the necessary injury which surgical resection causes. The paper argues that the ‘ward round’ is a mythical structure constituted as an organisational strategy to counter challenges from patients to their hegemonic discourse.

AB - The surgical ward round is examined as an organisational strategy entered into by surgeons to enable particular claims about the success of surgery to be validated. The paper reports ethnographic data from UK surgical wards which suggest that surgeons organise the discourse of their interactions with patients around three themes: physiology, wound condition and recovery/discharge. These themes are surgeon‐centred, and are organised to deny patients access to the agenda of these encounters. Within a post‐structuralist and postmodern framework, these strategies of discourse organisation are understood as techniques of power. Surgeons privilege discourses which support their claims to be healers, denying those which focus on the necessary injury which surgical resection causes. The paper argues that the ‘ward round’ is a mythical structure constituted as an organisational strategy to counter challenges from patients to their hegemonic discourse.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21144463476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11343783

DO - 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11343783

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 16

EP - 20

JO - Sociology of Health and Illness

JF - Sociology of Health and Illness

SN - 0141-9889

IS - 1

ER -