Distinguishing Stalker Modus Operandi: An Exploration of the Mullen, Pathé, Purcell, and Stuart (1999) Typology in a Law-Enforcement Sample

Donna Youngs, Maria Ioannou, Adam Straszewicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Effective management of stalking cases relies upon distinguishing different forms of the offence. In the clinical context, Mullen et al. typology of stalkers is the most widely used classification system, the basis of the Stalking Risk Profile assessment tool. The present study explores the detailed patterns of stalking behaviour observed in a law enforcement context to explore the applicability of the Mullen et al. clinical framework. Data are derived from 50 stalking cases obtained from the Threat Management Unit of the Los Angeles Police Department. Twenty-six offence variables were submitted to a multidimensional scaling procedure, namely Smallest Space Analysis. Results showed that, as Mullen et al. posited, while some support for the incompetent and rejected types could be found, this clinical typology of stalkers did not hold in the law enforcement sample. An alternative framework for distinguishing detailed stalking offending styles and a common basis for understanding the development of these in an increasing intrusiveness is proposed.

LanguageEnglish
Pages319-336
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Stalking
Law Enforcement
Nimodipine
Los Angeles
Case Management
Police

Cite this

@article{c5c7a71356a64d81a38b2d846c5a7a29,
title = "Distinguishing Stalker Modus Operandi: An Exploration of the Mullen, Path{\'e}, Purcell, and Stuart (1999) Typology in a Law-Enforcement Sample",
abstract = "Effective management of stalking cases relies upon distinguishing different forms of the offence. In the clinical context, Mullen et al. typology of stalkers is the most widely used classification system, the basis of the Stalking Risk Profile assessment tool. The present study explores the detailed patterns of stalking behaviour observed in a law enforcement context to explore the applicability of the Mullen et al. clinical framework. Data are derived from 50 stalking cases obtained from the Threat Management Unit of the Los Angeles Police Department. Twenty-six offence variables were submitted to a multidimensional scaling procedure, namely Smallest Space Analysis. Results showed that, as Mullen et al. posited, while some support for the incompetent and rejected types could be found, this clinical typology of stalkers did not hold in the law enforcement sample. An alternative framework for distinguishing detailed stalking offending styles and a common basis for understanding the development of these in an increasing intrusiveness is proposed.",
keywords = "Criminal Behaviour, Modelling Offending Style, Stalking, Typologies, Victim Role Model",
author = "Donna Youngs and Maria Ioannou and Adam Straszewicz",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/14789949.2013.795239",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "319--336",
journal = "Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology",
issn = "1478-9949",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinguishing Stalker Modus Operandi

T2 - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

AU - Youngs, Donna

AU - Ioannou, Maria

AU - Straszewicz, Adam

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Effective management of stalking cases relies upon distinguishing different forms of the offence. In the clinical context, Mullen et al. typology of stalkers is the most widely used classification system, the basis of the Stalking Risk Profile assessment tool. The present study explores the detailed patterns of stalking behaviour observed in a law enforcement context to explore the applicability of the Mullen et al. clinical framework. Data are derived from 50 stalking cases obtained from the Threat Management Unit of the Los Angeles Police Department. Twenty-six offence variables were submitted to a multidimensional scaling procedure, namely Smallest Space Analysis. Results showed that, as Mullen et al. posited, while some support for the incompetent and rejected types could be found, this clinical typology of stalkers did not hold in the law enforcement sample. An alternative framework for distinguishing detailed stalking offending styles and a common basis for understanding the development of these in an increasing intrusiveness is proposed.

AB - Effective management of stalking cases relies upon distinguishing different forms of the offence. In the clinical context, Mullen et al. typology of stalkers is the most widely used classification system, the basis of the Stalking Risk Profile assessment tool. The present study explores the detailed patterns of stalking behaviour observed in a law enforcement context to explore the applicability of the Mullen et al. clinical framework. Data are derived from 50 stalking cases obtained from the Threat Management Unit of the Los Angeles Police Department. Twenty-six offence variables were submitted to a multidimensional scaling procedure, namely Smallest Space Analysis. Results showed that, as Mullen et al. posited, while some support for the incompetent and rejected types could be found, this clinical typology of stalkers did not hold in the law enforcement sample. An alternative framework for distinguishing detailed stalking offending styles and a common basis for understanding the development of these in an increasing intrusiveness is proposed.

KW - Criminal Behaviour

KW - Modelling Offending Style

KW - Stalking

KW - Typologies

KW - Victim Role Model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879613434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14789949.2013.795239

DO - 10.1080/14789949.2013.795239

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 319

EP - 336

JO - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

JF - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

SN - 1478-9949

IS - 3

ER -