Do makerspaces represent scalable production models of community-based redistributed manufacturing?

Patrick A. Hennelly, Jagjit Singh Srai, Gary Graham, Royston Meriton, Mukesh Kumar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research explores the development of local community-based ‘makerspaces’ as potential scalable forms of redistributed manufacturing (RDM). Makerspaces are rapidly emerging in post-industrial economies and have been identified as a catalyst of local regeneration in urban areas. However, their role in local production systems is limited. There is a gap in the literature, with respect to the evolution of makerspaces and their productive contribution. The purpose of this paper therefore is to identify, classify and examine the different types of makerspaces. Our focus is on the implementation characteristics that enable industrial production activity to take place. First, we used Leximancer (to identify from the literature) three types of makerspace. Second, we then identify five RDM implementation characteristics. The characteristics were integrated together to form the RDM-makerspace implementation model. Third, case studies were purposively selected to test and advance this model. They were subsequently classified as a Type 1 (educational), Type 2 (design) or Type 3 (production) makerspace. Only one of the case studies was classified as a fully evolved Type 3 production space. The findings concur with the literature that makerspaces tend to be primarily Type 1 or Type 2. Finally, the contribution to local production theory is emphasized.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)540-554
Number of pages15
JournalProduction Planning and Control
Volume30
Issue number7
Early online date15 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do makerspaces represent scalable production models of community-based redistributed manufacturing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this