Abstract
Introduction
Several studies suggest that Asian countries are particularly afflicted by problematic Internet use (PIU).
Methods
The present study investigates whether individual differences in the acceptance of power distance can be linked to overuse of the Internet in Germany and in China. Power distance has been discussed as an essential dimension on which Asian and Western societies differ. In the present study, we investigate two large non‐clinical samples from Germany (n = 297) and China (n = 556) to address this question.
Results
Both in Germany and in China, high acceptance of power distance was positively associated with PIU. These effects were more pronounced in China compared with Germany. Moreover, the observed effects were stronger in males compared with females.
Discussion
Clearly, these findings are just a starting point and need to be replicated in the future. Clinical populations and a further important difference variable – collectivism – also merit consideration in future work.
Several studies suggest that Asian countries are particularly afflicted by problematic Internet use (PIU).
Methods
The present study investigates whether individual differences in the acceptance of power distance can be linked to overuse of the Internet in Germany and in China. Power distance has been discussed as an essential dimension on which Asian and Western societies differ. In the present study, we investigate two large non‐clinical samples from Germany (n = 297) and China (n = 556) to address this question.
Results
Both in Germany and in China, high acceptance of power distance was positively associated with PIU. These effects were more pronounced in China compared with Germany. Moreover, the observed effects were stronger in males compared with females.
Discussion
Clearly, these findings are just a starting point and need to be replicated in the future. Clinical populations and a further important difference variable – collectivism – also merit consideration in future work.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 296-301 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Asia-Pacific Psychiatry |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 17 Dec 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |