“Doing deference”: Identities and relational practices in chinese online discussion boards

Michael Haugh, Wei Lin Melody Chang, Dániel Z. Kádár

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we examine a key relational practice found in interactions in online discussion boards in Mainland China and Taiwan: ‘doing deference’. In drawing attention to a relational practice that has received attention in quite different research traditions, namely, linguistic pragmatics and conversation analysis (CA), we mean to highlight the possible advantages of an approach to analysis that draws from both in analysing relational work in CMC. We claim in the course of our analysis that the participants are orienting not only to relationships but also to identities through this practice. In this way, we suggest that online discussion boards afford both meaningful interaction and relational work. We further claim that this analysis provides support for the theoretical position that while relational practices may intersect with the emergence of identities, they remain distinct analytical concerns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-98
Number of pages26
JournalPragmatics
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2015

Fingerprint

relational work
conversation analysis
interaction
Taiwan
pragmatics
linguistics
China
Deference
Discussion Boards
Relational Practice
Online Discussion
Interaction
Relational Work
Conversation Analysis
Pragmatic Analysis
Mainland China
Linguistic Pragmatics
Research Traditions

Cite this

Haugh, Michael ; Chang, Wei Lin Melody ; Kádár, Dániel Z. / “Doing deference” : Identities and relational practices in chinese online discussion boards. In: Pragmatics. 2015 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 73-98.
@article{2d129da5e120408dbc5a893532104f4f,
title = "“Doing deference”: Identities and relational practices in chinese online discussion boards",
abstract = "In this paper we examine a key relational practice found in interactions in online discussion boards in Mainland China and Taiwan: ‘doing deference’. In drawing attention to a relational practice that has received attention in quite different research traditions, namely, linguistic pragmatics and conversation analysis (CA), we mean to highlight the possible advantages of an approach to analysis that draws from both in analysing relational work in CMC. We claim in the course of our analysis that the participants are orienting not only to relationships but also to identities through this practice. In this way, we suggest that online discussion boards afford both meaningful interaction and relational work. We further claim that this analysis provides support for the theoretical position that while relational practices may intersect with the emergence of identities, they remain distinct analytical concerns.",
keywords = "Chinese, Computer-mediated communication, Conversation analysis, Deference, Face, Fora, Impoliteness, Politeness",
author = "Michael Haugh and Chang, {Wei Lin Melody} and K{\'a}d{\'a}r, {D{\'a}niel Z.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/prag.25.1.04hau",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "73--98",
journal = "Pragmatics",
issn = "1018-2101",
publisher = "International Pragmatics Association",
number = "1",

}

“Doing deference” : Identities and relational practices in chinese online discussion boards. / Haugh, Michael; Chang, Wei Lin Melody; Kádár, Dániel Z.

In: Pragmatics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 73-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Doing deference”

T2 - Identities and relational practices in chinese online discussion boards

AU - Haugh, Michael

AU - Chang, Wei Lin Melody

AU - Kádár, Dániel Z.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - In this paper we examine a key relational practice found in interactions in online discussion boards in Mainland China and Taiwan: ‘doing deference’. In drawing attention to a relational practice that has received attention in quite different research traditions, namely, linguistic pragmatics and conversation analysis (CA), we mean to highlight the possible advantages of an approach to analysis that draws from both in analysing relational work in CMC. We claim in the course of our analysis that the participants are orienting not only to relationships but also to identities through this practice. In this way, we suggest that online discussion boards afford both meaningful interaction and relational work. We further claim that this analysis provides support for the theoretical position that while relational practices may intersect with the emergence of identities, they remain distinct analytical concerns.

AB - In this paper we examine a key relational practice found in interactions in online discussion boards in Mainland China and Taiwan: ‘doing deference’. In drawing attention to a relational practice that has received attention in quite different research traditions, namely, linguistic pragmatics and conversation analysis (CA), we mean to highlight the possible advantages of an approach to analysis that draws from both in analysing relational work in CMC. We claim in the course of our analysis that the participants are orienting not only to relationships but also to identities through this practice. In this way, we suggest that online discussion boards afford both meaningful interaction and relational work. We further claim that this analysis provides support for the theoretical position that while relational practices may intersect with the emergence of identities, they remain distinct analytical concerns.

KW - Chinese

KW - Computer-mediated communication

KW - Conversation analysis

KW - Deference

KW - Face

KW - Fora

KW - Impoliteness

KW - Politeness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941759799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/prag.25.1.04hau

DO - 10.1075/prag.25.1.04hau

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 73

EP - 98

JO - Pragmatics

JF - Pragmatics

SN - 1018-2101

IS - 1

ER -