Doing it right instead of twice

A Popperian approach to management decisions

Christopher Cowton, Gerhard Zecha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fundamental to Sir Karl Popper’s oeuvre was the insight that humans err – and that we can learn from our mistakes. Critique is therefore valuable in all human endeavours. Although this stance is most famously seen in Popper’s claim that to be scientific a theory or hypothesis has to be falsifiable, Popper adopted a critical approach extensively in his work towards whatever crossed his path. Yet he never developed or suggested a general method of criticism. In this paper we present and explain a method of criticism consistent with Popper’s approach and applicable to every rationally accessible part of human life including anagement theory and practice.

Managers of course already know the importance of learning from mistakes. But what we propose here in our Model of Rational Criticism places the emphasis on learning before we actually make the mistakes by seeking to eradicate errors of reasoning, thus reducing the chance of costly errors in implementation. We conclude by exploring some of the implications of our model for managers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-33
Number of pages11
JournalPhilosophy of Management
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2003

Fingerprint

management decision
criticism
manager
learning

Cite this

@article{ea70809de3b1471a932a461fb3037de9,
title = "Doing it right instead of twice: A Popperian approach to management decisions",
abstract = "Fundamental to Sir Karl Popper’s oeuvre was the insight that humans err – and that we can learn from our mistakes. Critique is therefore valuable in all human endeavours. Although this stance is most famously seen in Popper’s claim that to be scientific a theory or hypothesis has to be falsifiable, Popper adopted a critical approach extensively in his work towards whatever crossed his path. Yet he never developed or suggested a general method of criticism. In this paper we present and explain a method of criticism consistent with Popper’s approach and applicable to every rationally accessible part of human life including anagement theory and practice.Managers of course already know the importance of learning from mistakes. But what we propose here in our Model of Rational Criticism places the emphasis on learning before we actually make the mistakes by seeking to eradicate errors of reasoning, thus reducing the chance of costly errors in implementation. We conclude by exploring some of the implications of our model for managers.",
keywords = "Rational Criticism, Moral Responsibility, Management Volume, Ideal Observer, Costly Error",
author = "Christopher Cowton and Gerhard Zecha",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
doi = "10.5840/pom20033220",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "23--33",
journal = "Philosophy of Management",
number = "2",

}

Doing it right instead of twice : A Popperian approach to management decisions. / Cowton, Christopher; Zecha, Gerhard.

In: Philosophy of Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, 06.2003, p. 23-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doing it right instead of twice

T2 - A Popperian approach to management decisions

AU - Cowton, Christopher

AU - Zecha, Gerhard

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

N2 - Fundamental to Sir Karl Popper’s oeuvre was the insight that humans err – and that we can learn from our mistakes. Critique is therefore valuable in all human endeavours. Although this stance is most famously seen in Popper’s claim that to be scientific a theory or hypothesis has to be falsifiable, Popper adopted a critical approach extensively in his work towards whatever crossed his path. Yet he never developed or suggested a general method of criticism. In this paper we present and explain a method of criticism consistent with Popper’s approach and applicable to every rationally accessible part of human life including anagement theory and practice.Managers of course already know the importance of learning from mistakes. But what we propose here in our Model of Rational Criticism places the emphasis on learning before we actually make the mistakes by seeking to eradicate errors of reasoning, thus reducing the chance of costly errors in implementation. We conclude by exploring some of the implications of our model for managers.

AB - Fundamental to Sir Karl Popper’s oeuvre was the insight that humans err – and that we can learn from our mistakes. Critique is therefore valuable in all human endeavours. Although this stance is most famously seen in Popper’s claim that to be scientific a theory or hypothesis has to be falsifiable, Popper adopted a critical approach extensively in his work towards whatever crossed his path. Yet he never developed or suggested a general method of criticism. In this paper we present and explain a method of criticism consistent with Popper’s approach and applicable to every rationally accessible part of human life including anagement theory and practice.Managers of course already know the importance of learning from mistakes. But what we propose here in our Model of Rational Criticism places the emphasis on learning before we actually make the mistakes by seeking to eradicate errors of reasoning, thus reducing the chance of costly errors in implementation. We conclude by exploring some of the implications of our model for managers.

KW - Rational Criticism

KW - Moral Responsibility

KW - Management Volume

KW - Ideal Observer

KW - Costly Error

U2 - 10.5840/pom20033220

DO - 10.5840/pom20033220

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 23

EP - 33

JO - Philosophy of Management

JF - Philosophy of Management

IS - 2

ER -