Donor type and parental disclosure following oocyte donation

John Stephenson, Eric Blyth, Wendy Kramer, Jennifer Schneider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain the perspectives of parents of children conceived via oocyte donation regarding donor anonymity and disclosure of the nature of their conception to their children. Methods: Information was gathered by means of an anonymous online survey initiated by the Donor Sibling Registry, in which 108 parents with 143 children conceived following oocyte donation and aged between one year and 15 years participated. Results: Parental use of an anonymous or open-identity donor-and regardless of parental choice of donor-makes very little difference to the timing of parental disclosure to their donor-conceived child about their conception. The median age of children at disclosure is about 3.5 years; UK/Australian parents seem more ready to tell their children at an early stage (median age around two years) than North American parents (median age around 4.5 years), although about three quarters of all children have been told by the age of six years. Considerable ambiguity among parents who intend to disclose to their children as to the optimal age of disclosure is evidenced. Conclusions: Parents' experiences of disclosure to children at different ages need to be more thoroughly examined in order to establish a coherent body of knowledge that may facilitate improved evidence-based parental decision making.

LanguageEnglish
Pages42-47
Number of pages6
JournalAsian Pacific Journal of Reproduction
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Oocyte Donation
Disclosure
oocytes
Tissue Donors
Parents
Registries
Siblings
decision making
Decision Making

Cite this

Stephenson, John ; Blyth, Eric ; Kramer, Wendy ; Schneider, Jennifer. / Donor type and parental disclosure following oocyte donation. In: Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction. 2012 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 42-47.
@article{cd0c0f3e8e0e467b8d826a1649e3243c,
title = "Donor type and parental disclosure following oocyte donation",
abstract = "Objective: To ascertain the perspectives of parents of children conceived via oocyte donation regarding donor anonymity and disclosure of the nature of their conception to their children. Methods: Information was gathered by means of an anonymous online survey initiated by the Donor Sibling Registry, in which 108 parents with 143 children conceived following oocyte donation and aged between one year and 15 years participated. Results: Parental use of an anonymous or open-identity donor-and regardless of parental choice of donor-makes very little difference to the timing of parental disclosure to their donor-conceived child about their conception. The median age of children at disclosure is about 3.5 years; UK/Australian parents seem more ready to tell their children at an early stage (median age around two years) than North American parents (median age around 4.5 years), although about three quarters of all children have been told by the age of six years. Considerable ambiguity among parents who intend to disclose to their children as to the optimal age of disclosure is evidenced. Conclusions: Parents' experiences of disclosure to children at different ages need to be more thoroughly examined in order to establish a coherent body of knowledge that may facilitate improved evidence-based parental decision making.",
keywords = "Anonymous donation, Disclosure of donor conception, Oocyte donation, Open-identity donation",
author = "John Stephenson and Eric Blyth and Wendy Kramer and Jennifer Schneider",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S2305-0500(13)60046-9",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "42--47",
journal = "Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction",
issn = "2305-0500",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

Donor type and parental disclosure following oocyte donation. / Stephenson, John; Blyth, Eric; Kramer, Wendy; Schneider, Jennifer.

In: Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.03.2012, p. 42-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Donor type and parental disclosure following oocyte donation

AU - Stephenson, John

AU - Blyth, Eric

AU - Kramer, Wendy

AU - Schneider, Jennifer

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Objective: To ascertain the perspectives of parents of children conceived via oocyte donation regarding donor anonymity and disclosure of the nature of their conception to their children. Methods: Information was gathered by means of an anonymous online survey initiated by the Donor Sibling Registry, in which 108 parents with 143 children conceived following oocyte donation and aged between one year and 15 years participated. Results: Parental use of an anonymous or open-identity donor-and regardless of parental choice of donor-makes very little difference to the timing of parental disclosure to their donor-conceived child about their conception. The median age of children at disclosure is about 3.5 years; UK/Australian parents seem more ready to tell their children at an early stage (median age around two years) than North American parents (median age around 4.5 years), although about three quarters of all children have been told by the age of six years. Considerable ambiguity among parents who intend to disclose to their children as to the optimal age of disclosure is evidenced. Conclusions: Parents' experiences of disclosure to children at different ages need to be more thoroughly examined in order to establish a coherent body of knowledge that may facilitate improved evidence-based parental decision making.

AB - Objective: To ascertain the perspectives of parents of children conceived via oocyte donation regarding donor anonymity and disclosure of the nature of their conception to their children. Methods: Information was gathered by means of an anonymous online survey initiated by the Donor Sibling Registry, in which 108 parents with 143 children conceived following oocyte donation and aged between one year and 15 years participated. Results: Parental use of an anonymous or open-identity donor-and regardless of parental choice of donor-makes very little difference to the timing of parental disclosure to their donor-conceived child about their conception. The median age of children at disclosure is about 3.5 years; UK/Australian parents seem more ready to tell their children at an early stage (median age around two years) than North American parents (median age around 4.5 years), although about three quarters of all children have been told by the age of six years. Considerable ambiguity among parents who intend to disclose to their children as to the optimal age of disclosure is evidenced. Conclusions: Parents' experiences of disclosure to children at different ages need to be more thoroughly examined in order to establish a coherent body of knowledge that may facilitate improved evidence-based parental decision making.

KW - Anonymous donation

KW - Disclosure of donor conception

KW - Oocyte donation

KW - Open-identity donation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929141938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S2305-0500(13)60046-9

DO - 10.1016/S2305-0500(13)60046-9

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 42

EP - 47

JO - Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction

T2 - Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction

JF - Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction

SN - 2305-0500

IS - 1

ER -