Abstract
Introduction: Natural bioflavonoids, particularly hesperidin from citrus fruits, have attracted attention due to their potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and neuroprotective properties. However, the clinical application of hesperidin is restricted by poor solubility, low bioavailability and stability issues.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidance, we searched PubMed, MEDLINE Scopus and Google Scholar from inception to 10 January 2025 using terms combining “hesperidin” with “bioavailability”, “solubility”, “absorption” and “formulation”. Two reviewers independently screened records against predefined inclusion criteria (original, formulation-centred studies reporting biopharmaceutical or biological outcomes), resolved disagreements by discussion/third-reviewer adjudication, extracted data via a standard template, and assessed risk of bias across six domains.
Results: From 1,625 records, 69 studies met eligibility. Platforms spanned inclusion complexes, solid dispersions, SMEDDS/SNEDDS, microparticles, gels/microemulsions, and diverse nanoformulations (polymeric, lipidic, metallic, exosomal). Most approaches increased dissolution and/or exposure; lipidic and polymeric nanosystems delivered the largest, most consistent improvements, with early clinical signals in vascular, metabolic and oncological indications.
Conclusions: Formulation advances can meaningfully mitigate hesperidin’s biopharmaceutic liabilities, with lipid-based systems, polymeric nanoparticles and phytosomes emerging as leading strategies. Translation will benefit from stability and immunotoxicity packages, Quality-by-Design manufacturing, and well-designed, adequately powered clinical trials using harmonised pharmacokinetic and clinical endpoints.
INPLASY registration: INPLASY202550096
Methods: Following PRISMA guidance, we searched PubMed, MEDLINE Scopus and Google Scholar from inception to 10 January 2025 using terms combining “hesperidin” with “bioavailability”, “solubility”, “absorption” and “formulation”. Two reviewers independently screened records against predefined inclusion criteria (original, formulation-centred studies reporting biopharmaceutical or biological outcomes), resolved disagreements by discussion/third-reviewer adjudication, extracted data via a standard template, and assessed risk of bias across six domains.
Results: From 1,625 records, 69 studies met eligibility. Platforms spanned inclusion complexes, solid dispersions, SMEDDS/SNEDDS, microparticles, gels/microemulsions, and diverse nanoformulations (polymeric, lipidic, metallic, exosomal). Most approaches increased dissolution and/or exposure; lipidic and polymeric nanosystems delivered the largest, most consistent improvements, with early clinical signals in vascular, metabolic and oncological indications.
Conclusions: Formulation advances can meaningfully mitigate hesperidin’s biopharmaceutic liabilities, with lipid-based systems, polymeric nanoparticles and phytosomes emerging as leading strategies. Translation will benefit from stability and immunotoxicity packages, Quality-by-Design manufacturing, and well-designed, adequately powered clinical trials using harmonised pharmacokinetic and clinical endpoints.
INPLASY registration: INPLASY202550096
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 363-384 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 5 Nov 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Drug delivery and formulation development of hesperidin: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver