Dysplasia severity, but not experiences during colposcopy, predicts adherence to follow-up colposcopy

Susanna Kola, Jane C. Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Patient adherence with treatment recommendations is an essential factor for the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs. Psychological factors may play a role in patient adherence to cervical cancer screening. The present study aimed to extend knowledge of women's adherence to follow-up colposcopy, by examining possible predictive biopsychosocial variables measured at colposcopy and objective attendance rates from patients' medical files. 

Methods: Baseline data on psychosocial factors (e.g. demographic variables, state anxiety, and pain) were collected from 141 women prior to undergoing colposcopy for the first time (M age = 29.63, SD = 8.39). Experiences of colposcopy and adherence to follow-up (within two years) were assessed subsequently. 

Results: There were no associations between adherence and demographic variables. Women with severe dysplasia were more likely to adhere to follow-up colposcopy than women with other histology grades. Women who did not attend for follow-up reported significantly greater state anxiety and pain unpleasantness following colposcopy than women who did attend. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the psychological experiences of colposcopy did not predict adherence status. However, dysplasia severity made a significant contribution to the model. The odds of adhering to colposcopy for patients with severe dysplasia were 3.57 times higher than for patients with normal histology, and 4.35 times higher than for patients with moderate dysplasia (p = 0.005). 

Conclusions: Colposcopy-related experiences do not appear to be strong predictors of adherence, but women with dysplasia grades other than 'severe' should be targeted for follow-up recommendations and advice.

LanguageEnglish
Pages291-296
Number of pages6
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colposcopy
Patient Compliance
Psychology
Early Detection of Cancer
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Histology
Anxiety
Demography
Pain
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

Cite this

@article{f488e4c9e8584acfa570f7793bd6f52a,
title = "Dysplasia severity, but not experiences during colposcopy, predicts adherence to follow-up colposcopy",
abstract = "Objective: Patient adherence with treatment recommendations is an essential factor for the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs. Psychological factors may play a role in patient adherence to cervical cancer screening. The present study aimed to extend knowledge of women's adherence to follow-up colposcopy, by examining possible predictive biopsychosocial variables measured at colposcopy and objective attendance rates from patients' medical files. Methods: Baseline data on psychosocial factors (e.g. demographic variables, state anxiety, and pain) were collected from 141 women prior to undergoing colposcopy for the first time (M age = 29.63, SD = 8.39). Experiences of colposcopy and adherence to follow-up (within two years) were assessed subsequently. Results: There were no associations between adherence and demographic variables. Women with severe dysplasia were more likely to adhere to follow-up colposcopy than women with other histology grades. Women who did not attend for follow-up reported significantly greater state anxiety and pain unpleasantness following colposcopy than women who did attend. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the psychological experiences of colposcopy did not predict adherence status. However, dysplasia severity made a significant contribution to the model. The odds of adhering to colposcopy for patients with severe dysplasia were 3.57 times higher than for patients with normal histology, and 4.35 times higher than for patients with moderate dysplasia (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Colposcopy-related experiences do not appear to be strong predictors of adherence, but women with dysplasia grades other than 'severe' should be targeted for follow-up recommendations and advice.",
keywords = "adherence, anxiety, cervical cancer, colposcopy, oncology, pain perception",
author = "Susanna Kola and Walsh, {Jane C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/pon.1895",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "291--296",
journal = "Psycho-Oncology",
issn = "1057-9249",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Dysplasia severity, but not experiences during colposcopy, predicts adherence to follow-up colposcopy. / Kola, Susanna; Walsh, Jane C.

In: Psycho-Oncology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.03.2012, p. 291-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dysplasia severity, but not experiences during colposcopy, predicts adherence to follow-up colposcopy

AU - Kola, Susanna

AU - Walsh, Jane C.

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Objective: Patient adherence with treatment recommendations is an essential factor for the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs. Psychological factors may play a role in patient adherence to cervical cancer screening. The present study aimed to extend knowledge of women's adherence to follow-up colposcopy, by examining possible predictive biopsychosocial variables measured at colposcopy and objective attendance rates from patients' medical files. Methods: Baseline data on psychosocial factors (e.g. demographic variables, state anxiety, and pain) were collected from 141 women prior to undergoing colposcopy for the first time (M age = 29.63, SD = 8.39). Experiences of colposcopy and adherence to follow-up (within two years) were assessed subsequently. Results: There were no associations between adherence and demographic variables. Women with severe dysplasia were more likely to adhere to follow-up colposcopy than women with other histology grades. Women who did not attend for follow-up reported significantly greater state anxiety and pain unpleasantness following colposcopy than women who did attend. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the psychological experiences of colposcopy did not predict adherence status. However, dysplasia severity made a significant contribution to the model. The odds of adhering to colposcopy for patients with severe dysplasia were 3.57 times higher than for patients with normal histology, and 4.35 times higher than for patients with moderate dysplasia (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Colposcopy-related experiences do not appear to be strong predictors of adherence, but women with dysplasia grades other than 'severe' should be targeted for follow-up recommendations and advice.

AB - Objective: Patient adherence with treatment recommendations is an essential factor for the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs. Psychological factors may play a role in patient adherence to cervical cancer screening. The present study aimed to extend knowledge of women's adherence to follow-up colposcopy, by examining possible predictive biopsychosocial variables measured at colposcopy and objective attendance rates from patients' medical files. Methods: Baseline data on psychosocial factors (e.g. demographic variables, state anxiety, and pain) were collected from 141 women prior to undergoing colposcopy for the first time (M age = 29.63, SD = 8.39). Experiences of colposcopy and adherence to follow-up (within two years) were assessed subsequently. Results: There were no associations between adherence and demographic variables. Women with severe dysplasia were more likely to adhere to follow-up colposcopy than women with other histology grades. Women who did not attend for follow-up reported significantly greater state anxiety and pain unpleasantness following colposcopy than women who did attend. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the psychological experiences of colposcopy did not predict adherence status. However, dysplasia severity made a significant contribution to the model. The odds of adhering to colposcopy for patients with severe dysplasia were 3.57 times higher than for patients with normal histology, and 4.35 times higher than for patients with moderate dysplasia (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Colposcopy-related experiences do not appear to be strong predictors of adherence, but women with dysplasia grades other than 'severe' should be targeted for follow-up recommendations and advice.

KW - adherence

KW - anxiety

KW - cervical cancer

KW - colposcopy

KW - oncology

KW - pain perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858018707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pon.1895

DO - 10.1002/pon.1895

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 291

EP - 296

JO - Psycho-Oncology

T2 - Psycho-Oncology

JF - Psycho-Oncology

SN - 1057-9249

IS - 3

ER -