Eco-Thermodynamics of Hydrogen Production by High-Temperature Electrolysis Using Sold Oxide Cells

Andi Mehmeti, Athanasios Angelis-Dimakis, Carlos Boigues Muñoz, Marco Graziadio, Stephen J. McPhail

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, Solar Energy Demand (SED), Cumulative Exergy Extraction from the Natural Environment (CEENE), and LCA-ReCiPe 2016 (using both midpoint and endpoint modeling) life cycle impact assessment methods has been used to assess the performance of hydrogen (H2) production with renewable and non-renewable electricity sources via high-temperature Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells. The analysis identified most relevant impact categories, life cycle stages, and processes, both from a thermodynamic and an environmental viewpoint. Electrolysis with non-renewable energy is characterized by the greatest environmental burdens, however, renewable energy systems also have considerable environmental impacts, some of which are significant. While no perfect electricity source exists, a growing portion of the renewable-based electricity production in the grid mix is an attractive option to lower environmental impacts of H2 production. Irrespective of the evaluation method, the contribution analysis from different life-cycle stages shows and confirm that the major contributor to the environmental burdens is the electricity supply. The manufacturing stage has high relevance for mineral and metal resources and toxicity-related impacts. Calculations of grid-based electrolysis life cycle environmental impacts in some European countries showed that significant variations. For example, global warming potential per kgH2 produced vary between 3.31 and 48.24 kgCO2. Trade-off analysis between the midpoint and endpoint indicators revealed that water consumption, global warming, and particulate matter formation, play a major role in the ranking of electricity supply options. The findings suggest that all potential impacts both at the midpoint and endpoint level should be considered to ensure robust results of the LCA evaluation, a fair comparison between pathways towards more transparent and evidence-based decisions. Towards that end, a further country site-specific assessment with optimization strategies and integration of traditional LCA with resource accounting (thermodynamic metrics) will need to be developed to explore additional valuable insights towards sustainable electrolytic H2 production systems.

LanguageEnglish
Pages723-736
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume199
Early online date19 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Hydrogen production
Electrolysis
electrokinesis
life cycle
Electricity
thermodynamics
oxide
Thermodynamics
hydrogen
Life cycle
electricity
electricity supply
Oxides
environmental impact
Environmental impact
Global warming
global warming
Regenerative fuel cells
Temperature
exergy

Cite this

Mehmeti, Andi ; Angelis-Dimakis, Athanasios ; Muñoz, Carlos Boigues ; Graziadio, Marco ; McPhail, Stephen J. / Eco-Thermodynamics of Hydrogen Production by High-Temperature Electrolysis Using Sold Oxide Cells. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018 ; Vol. 199. pp. 723-736.
@article{d88787563a1f45db9815256cef0392f6,
title = "Eco-Thermodynamics of Hydrogen Production by High-Temperature Electrolysis Using Sold Oxide Cells",
abstract = "In this study, Solar Energy Demand (SED), Cumulative Exergy Extraction from the Natural Environment (CEENE), and LCA-ReCiPe 2016 (using both midpoint and endpoint modeling) life cycle impact assessment methods has been used to assess the performance of hydrogen (H2) production with renewable and non-renewable electricity sources via high-temperature Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells. The analysis identified most relevant impact categories, life cycle stages, and processes, both from a thermodynamic and an environmental viewpoint. Electrolysis with non-renewable energy is characterized by the greatest environmental burdens, however, renewable energy systems also have considerable environmental impacts, some of which are significant. While no perfect electricity source exists, a growing portion of the renewable-based electricity production in the grid mix is an attractive option to lower environmental impacts of H2 production. Irrespective of the evaluation method, the contribution analysis from different life-cycle stages shows and confirm that the major contributor to the environmental burdens is the electricity supply. The manufacturing stage has high relevance for mineral and metal resources and toxicity-related impacts. Calculations of grid-based electrolysis life cycle environmental impacts in some European countries showed that significant variations. For example, global warming potential per kgH2 produced vary between 3.31 and 48.24 kgCO2. Trade-off analysis between the midpoint and endpoint indicators revealed that water consumption, global warming, and particulate matter formation, play a major role in the ranking of electricity supply options. The findings suggest that all potential impacts both at the midpoint and endpoint level should be considered to ensure robust results of the LCA evaluation, a fair comparison between pathways towards more transparent and evidence-based decisions. Towards that end, a further country site-specific assessment with optimization strategies and integration of traditional LCA with resource accounting (thermodynamic metrics) will need to be developed to explore additional valuable insights towards sustainable electrolytic H2 production systems.",
keywords = "Eco-Thermodynamics, Electrolysis, Hydrogen, LCA, Power-to-Gas, Resource Footprint",
author = "Andi Mehmeti and Athanasios Angelis-Dimakis and Mu{\~n}oz, {Carlos Boigues} and Marco Graziadio and McPhail, {Stephen J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.166",
language = "English",
volume = "199",
pages = "723--736",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Eco-Thermodynamics of Hydrogen Production by High-Temperature Electrolysis Using Sold Oxide Cells. / Mehmeti, Andi; Angelis-Dimakis, Athanasios; Muñoz, Carlos Boigues; Graziadio, Marco; McPhail, Stephen J.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 199, 20.10.2018, p. 723-736.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eco-Thermodynamics of Hydrogen Production by High-Temperature Electrolysis Using Sold Oxide Cells

AU - Mehmeti, Andi

AU - Angelis-Dimakis, Athanasios

AU - Muñoz, Carlos Boigues

AU - Graziadio, Marco

AU - McPhail, Stephen J.

PY - 2018/10/20

Y1 - 2018/10/20

N2 - In this study, Solar Energy Demand (SED), Cumulative Exergy Extraction from the Natural Environment (CEENE), and LCA-ReCiPe 2016 (using both midpoint and endpoint modeling) life cycle impact assessment methods has been used to assess the performance of hydrogen (H2) production with renewable and non-renewable electricity sources via high-temperature Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells. The analysis identified most relevant impact categories, life cycle stages, and processes, both from a thermodynamic and an environmental viewpoint. Electrolysis with non-renewable energy is characterized by the greatest environmental burdens, however, renewable energy systems also have considerable environmental impacts, some of which are significant. While no perfect electricity source exists, a growing portion of the renewable-based electricity production in the grid mix is an attractive option to lower environmental impacts of H2 production. Irrespective of the evaluation method, the contribution analysis from different life-cycle stages shows and confirm that the major contributor to the environmental burdens is the electricity supply. The manufacturing stage has high relevance for mineral and metal resources and toxicity-related impacts. Calculations of grid-based electrolysis life cycle environmental impacts in some European countries showed that significant variations. For example, global warming potential per kgH2 produced vary between 3.31 and 48.24 kgCO2. Trade-off analysis between the midpoint and endpoint indicators revealed that water consumption, global warming, and particulate matter formation, play a major role in the ranking of electricity supply options. The findings suggest that all potential impacts both at the midpoint and endpoint level should be considered to ensure robust results of the LCA evaluation, a fair comparison between pathways towards more transparent and evidence-based decisions. Towards that end, a further country site-specific assessment with optimization strategies and integration of traditional LCA with resource accounting (thermodynamic metrics) will need to be developed to explore additional valuable insights towards sustainable electrolytic H2 production systems.

AB - In this study, Solar Energy Demand (SED), Cumulative Exergy Extraction from the Natural Environment (CEENE), and LCA-ReCiPe 2016 (using both midpoint and endpoint modeling) life cycle impact assessment methods has been used to assess the performance of hydrogen (H2) production with renewable and non-renewable electricity sources via high-temperature Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells. The analysis identified most relevant impact categories, life cycle stages, and processes, both from a thermodynamic and an environmental viewpoint. Electrolysis with non-renewable energy is characterized by the greatest environmental burdens, however, renewable energy systems also have considerable environmental impacts, some of which are significant. While no perfect electricity source exists, a growing portion of the renewable-based electricity production in the grid mix is an attractive option to lower environmental impacts of H2 production. Irrespective of the evaluation method, the contribution analysis from different life-cycle stages shows and confirm that the major contributor to the environmental burdens is the electricity supply. The manufacturing stage has high relevance for mineral and metal resources and toxicity-related impacts. Calculations of grid-based electrolysis life cycle environmental impacts in some European countries showed that significant variations. For example, global warming potential per kgH2 produced vary between 3.31 and 48.24 kgCO2. Trade-off analysis between the midpoint and endpoint indicators revealed that water consumption, global warming, and particulate matter formation, play a major role in the ranking of electricity supply options. The findings suggest that all potential impacts both at the midpoint and endpoint level should be considered to ensure robust results of the LCA evaluation, a fair comparison between pathways towards more transparent and evidence-based decisions. Towards that end, a further country site-specific assessment with optimization strategies and integration of traditional LCA with resource accounting (thermodynamic metrics) will need to be developed to explore additional valuable insights towards sustainable electrolytic H2 production systems.

KW - Eco-Thermodynamics

KW - Electrolysis

KW - Hydrogen

KW - LCA

KW - Power-to-Gas

KW - Resource Footprint

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050682134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.166

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.166

M3 - Article

VL - 199

SP - 723

EP - 736

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

T2 - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -