‘Education ain’t for us’: using Bourdieu to understand the lives of young White working-class men classified as not in education, employment or training

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper uses the work of Pierre Bourdieu to understand the lives of a set of young White working-class men living in a deprived urban locale in the north of England. All participants were classified as NEET (not in education, employment or training) throughout the research and had spent lengthy periods of time outside education and work before the study commenced. Although none took part in formal employment, many participants engaged in illicit activities, often for material gain, during the course of the fieldwork. The data presented is drawn from ethnographic fieldwork and deals with participants’ attitudes to education, work and social life more broadly. Whilst some findings are troubling, the paper challenges dominant discourses about the attitudes, values and aspirations of NEET young people, especially those from White working-class backgrounds.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-213
Number of pages21
JournalResearch in Post-Compulsory Education
Volume25
Issue number2
Early online date18 May 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 May 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '‘Education ain’t for us’: using Bourdieu to understand the lives of young White working-class men classified as not in education, employment or training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this