“Education ain’t for us”:

using Bourdieu to understand the lives of young white working-class men classified as Not in Education, Employment or Training

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper uses the work of Pierre Bourdieu to understand the lives of a set of young White working-class men living in a deprived urban locale in the north of England. All participants were classified as NEET (not in education, employment or training) throughout the research and had spent lengthy periods of time outside education and work before the study commenced. Although none took part in formal employment, many participants engaged in illicit activities, often for material gain, during the course of the fieldwork. The data presented is drawn from ethnographic fieldwork and deals with participants’ attitudes to education, work and social life more broadly. Whilst some findings are troubling, the paper challenges dominant discourses about the attitudes, values and aspirations of NEET young people, especially those from White working-class backgrounds.
Original languageEnglish
JournalResearch in Post-Compulsory Education
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 11 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

working class
education
value-orientation
discourse

Cite this

@article{66fbb1082b014b1cad66be08dd0102d7,
title = "“Education ain’t for us”:: using Bourdieu to understand the lives of young white working-class men classified as Not in Education, Employment or Training",
abstract = "This paper uses the work of Pierre Bourdieu to understand the lives of a set of young White working-class men living in a deprived urban locale in the north of England. All participants were classified as NEET (not in education, employment or training) throughout the research and had spent lengthy periods of time outside education and work before the study commenced. Although none took part in formal employment, many participants engaged in illicit activities, often for material gain, during the course of the fieldwork. The data presented is drawn from ethnographic fieldwork and deals with participants’ attitudes to education, work and social life more broadly. Whilst some findings are troubling, the paper challenges dominant discourses about the attitudes, values and aspirations of NEET young people, especially those from White working-class backgrounds.",
keywords = "NEET, young men, White working class, Bourdieu, ethnography",
author = "Robin Simmons and Danny Connelly and Ronald Thompson",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "11",
language = "English",
journal = "Research in Post-Compulsory Education",
issn = "1359-6748",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Education ain’t for us”:

T2 - using Bourdieu to understand the lives of young white working-class men classified as Not in Education, Employment or Training

AU - Simmons, Robin

AU - Connelly, Danny

AU - Thompson, Ronald

PY - 2019/11/11

Y1 - 2019/11/11

N2 - This paper uses the work of Pierre Bourdieu to understand the lives of a set of young White working-class men living in a deprived urban locale in the north of England. All participants were classified as NEET (not in education, employment or training) throughout the research and had spent lengthy periods of time outside education and work before the study commenced. Although none took part in formal employment, many participants engaged in illicit activities, often for material gain, during the course of the fieldwork. The data presented is drawn from ethnographic fieldwork and deals with participants’ attitudes to education, work and social life more broadly. Whilst some findings are troubling, the paper challenges dominant discourses about the attitudes, values and aspirations of NEET young people, especially those from White working-class backgrounds.

AB - This paper uses the work of Pierre Bourdieu to understand the lives of a set of young White working-class men living in a deprived urban locale in the north of England. All participants were classified as NEET (not in education, employment or training) throughout the research and had spent lengthy periods of time outside education and work before the study commenced. Although none took part in formal employment, many participants engaged in illicit activities, often for material gain, during the course of the fieldwork. The data presented is drawn from ethnographic fieldwork and deals with participants’ attitudes to education, work and social life more broadly. Whilst some findings are troubling, the paper challenges dominant discourses about the attitudes, values and aspirations of NEET young people, especially those from White working-class backgrounds.

KW - NEET

KW - young men

KW - White working class

KW - Bourdieu

KW - ethnography

M3 - Article

JO - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

JF - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

SN - 1359-6748

ER -