Effectively using an online multidisciplinary tool to update healthcare mentors

a comparative evaluative study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper presents data comparing two evaluation studies following the implementation of a multiprofessional online mentor update tool designed to meet the learning needs of mentors in clinical healthcare practice. The data presented highlights that there was a positive response from clinicians using the tool during the first evaluation of 643 respondents and that this has remained positive following an increase in use to 1439. The huge resources needed to sustain traditional delivery of the updates, plus the inability of mentors to attend these events, were amongst the main drivers for the development of this tool. Results of the evaluation have identified that the flexibility of the online tool promotes engagement for both mentors and their line managers, and in doing so provides academic staff to alternatively utilize the time saved delivering it. The multiprofessional originality and uniqueness of the package has also promoted users to consider the mentor role from an inter-disciplinary perspective. With the Nursing and Midwifery Council praising the package as an example of innovative good practice, it is intended to promote its use in other regions that provide healthcare education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-46
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal on Advances in Life Sciences
Volume3
Issue number3 & 4
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Mentors
Delivery of Health Care
evaluation
Nursing
best practice
Midwifery
nursing
Managers
flexibility
Education
driver
manager
staff
event
Learning
resources
learning
education

Cite this

@article{ad5ba40160514ad69198d73c739c3286,
title = "Effectively using an online multidisciplinary tool to update healthcare mentors: a comparative evaluative study",
abstract = "This paper presents data comparing two evaluation studies following the implementation of a multiprofessional online mentor update tool designed to meet the learning needs of mentors in clinical healthcare practice. The data presented highlights that there was a positive response from clinicians using the tool during the first evaluation of 643 respondents and that this has remained positive following an increase in use to 1439. The huge resources needed to sustain traditional delivery of the updates, plus the inability of mentors to attend these events, were amongst the main drivers for the development of this tool. Results of the evaluation have identified that the flexibility of the online tool promotes engagement for both mentors and their line managers, and in doing so provides academic staff to alternatively utilize the time saved delivering it. The multiprofessional originality and uniqueness of the package has also promoted users to consider the mentor role from an inter-disciplinary perspective. With the Nursing and Midwifery Council praising the package as an example of innovative good practice, it is intended to promote its use in other regions that provide healthcare education.",
keywords = "Online, Mentor, Mentor Update, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary, Multiprofessional, Nursing",
author = "Stephen White and Karen Ousey",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "39--46",
journal = "International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences",
issn = "1942-2660",
publisher = "International Academy, Research, and Industry Association (IARIA)",
number = "3 & 4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectively using an online multidisciplinary tool to update healthcare mentors

T2 - a comparative evaluative study

AU - White, Stephen

AU - Ousey, Karen

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This paper presents data comparing two evaluation studies following the implementation of a multiprofessional online mentor update tool designed to meet the learning needs of mentors in clinical healthcare practice. The data presented highlights that there was a positive response from clinicians using the tool during the first evaluation of 643 respondents and that this has remained positive following an increase in use to 1439. The huge resources needed to sustain traditional delivery of the updates, plus the inability of mentors to attend these events, were amongst the main drivers for the development of this tool. Results of the evaluation have identified that the flexibility of the online tool promotes engagement for both mentors and their line managers, and in doing so provides academic staff to alternatively utilize the time saved delivering it. The multiprofessional originality and uniqueness of the package has also promoted users to consider the mentor role from an inter-disciplinary perspective. With the Nursing and Midwifery Council praising the package as an example of innovative good practice, it is intended to promote its use in other regions that provide healthcare education.

AB - This paper presents data comparing two evaluation studies following the implementation of a multiprofessional online mentor update tool designed to meet the learning needs of mentors in clinical healthcare practice. The data presented highlights that there was a positive response from clinicians using the tool during the first evaluation of 643 respondents and that this has remained positive following an increase in use to 1439. The huge resources needed to sustain traditional delivery of the updates, plus the inability of mentors to attend these events, were amongst the main drivers for the development of this tool. Results of the evaluation have identified that the flexibility of the online tool promotes engagement for both mentors and their line managers, and in doing so provides academic staff to alternatively utilize the time saved delivering it. The multiprofessional originality and uniqueness of the package has also promoted users to consider the mentor role from an inter-disciplinary perspective. With the Nursing and Midwifery Council praising the package as an example of innovative good practice, it is intended to promote its use in other regions that provide healthcare education.

KW - Online

KW - Mentor

KW - Mentor Update

KW - Multidisciplinary

KW - Interdisciplinary

KW - Multiprofessional

KW - Nursing

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 39

EP - 46

JO - International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences

JF - International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences

SN - 1942-2660

IS - 3 & 4

ER -