Effectiveness of Online Cancer Education for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals; a Systematic Review Using Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework

Karen Campbell, Vanessa Taylor, Sheila Douglas

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Embedding online learning within higher education can provide engaging, cost-effective, interactive and flexible education. By evaluating the impact, outcomes and pedagogical influence of online cancer and education, future curricula can be shaped and delivered by higher education providers to better meet learner, health care provider and educational commissioners’ requirements for enhanced patient care and service delivery needs. Using the Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of educational evaluation, a systematic review of the effectiveness of online cancer education for nurses and allied health professionals was conducted. From 101 articles, 30 papers were included in the review. Educational theory is not always employed. There is an absence of longitudinal studies to examine impact; an absence of reliability and/or validity testing of measures, limited experimental designs taking account of power and few attempts to mitigate bias. There is, however, an emerging innovative use of mobile/spaced learning techniques. Evidence for clinical and educational effectiveness is weak offering insights into experiences and participant perceptions rather than concrete quantitative data and patient-reported outcomes. More pedagogical research is merited to inform effective evaluation of online cancer education, which incorporates and demonstrates a longer-term impact.

LanguageEnglish
Pages339-356
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Cancer Education
Volume34
Issue number2
Early online date12 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Allied Health Personnel
Nurses
Education
Neoplasms
Learning
Educational Models
Reproducibility of Results
Health Personnel
Curriculum
Longitudinal Studies
Patient Care
Research Design
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Cite this

@article{113f9412b90946a1babdd95db86b9914,
title = "Effectiveness of Online Cancer Education for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals; a Systematic Review Using Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework",
abstract = "Embedding online learning within higher education can provide engaging, cost-effective, interactive and flexible education. By evaluating the impact, outcomes and pedagogical influence of online cancer and education, future curricula can be shaped and delivered by higher education providers to better meet learner, health care provider and educational commissioners’ requirements for enhanced patient care and service delivery needs. Using the Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of educational evaluation, a systematic review of the effectiveness of online cancer education for nurses and allied health professionals was conducted. From 101 articles, 30 papers were included in the review. Educational theory is not always employed. There is an absence of longitudinal studies to examine impact; an absence of reliability and/or validity testing of measures, limited experimental designs taking account of power and few attempts to mitigate bias. There is, however, an emerging innovative use of mobile/spaced learning techniques. Evidence for clinical and educational effectiveness is weak offering insights into experiences and participant perceptions rather than concrete quantitative data and patient-reported outcomes. More pedagogical research is merited to inform effective evaluation of online cancer education, which incorporates and demonstrates a longer-term impact.",
keywords = "Cancer, Education, Effectiveness, Evaluation, Nurses and allied health care professionals, Online, Theory",
author = "Karen Campbell and Vanessa Taylor and Sheila Douglas",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s13187-017-1308-2",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "339--356",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Education",
issn = "0885-8195",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

Effectiveness of Online Cancer Education for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals; a Systematic Review Using Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework. / Campbell, Karen; Taylor, Vanessa; Douglas, Sheila.

In: Journal of Cancer Education, Vol. 34, No. 2, 15.04.2019, p. 339-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of Online Cancer Education for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals; a Systematic Review Using Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework

AU - Campbell, Karen

AU - Taylor, Vanessa

AU - Douglas, Sheila

PY - 2019/4/15

Y1 - 2019/4/15

N2 - Embedding online learning within higher education can provide engaging, cost-effective, interactive and flexible education. By evaluating the impact, outcomes and pedagogical influence of online cancer and education, future curricula can be shaped and delivered by higher education providers to better meet learner, health care provider and educational commissioners’ requirements for enhanced patient care and service delivery needs. Using the Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of educational evaluation, a systematic review of the effectiveness of online cancer education for nurses and allied health professionals was conducted. From 101 articles, 30 papers were included in the review. Educational theory is not always employed. There is an absence of longitudinal studies to examine impact; an absence of reliability and/or validity testing of measures, limited experimental designs taking account of power and few attempts to mitigate bias. There is, however, an emerging innovative use of mobile/spaced learning techniques. Evidence for clinical and educational effectiveness is weak offering insights into experiences and participant perceptions rather than concrete quantitative data and patient-reported outcomes. More pedagogical research is merited to inform effective evaluation of online cancer education, which incorporates and demonstrates a longer-term impact.

AB - Embedding online learning within higher education can provide engaging, cost-effective, interactive and flexible education. By evaluating the impact, outcomes and pedagogical influence of online cancer and education, future curricula can be shaped and delivered by higher education providers to better meet learner, health care provider and educational commissioners’ requirements for enhanced patient care and service delivery needs. Using the Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of educational evaluation, a systematic review of the effectiveness of online cancer education for nurses and allied health professionals was conducted. From 101 articles, 30 papers were included in the review. Educational theory is not always employed. There is an absence of longitudinal studies to examine impact; an absence of reliability and/or validity testing of measures, limited experimental designs taking account of power and few attempts to mitigate bias. There is, however, an emerging innovative use of mobile/spaced learning techniques. Evidence for clinical and educational effectiveness is weak offering insights into experiences and participant perceptions rather than concrete quantitative data and patient-reported outcomes. More pedagogical research is merited to inform effective evaluation of online cancer education, which incorporates and demonstrates a longer-term impact.

KW - Cancer

KW - Education

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Evaluation

KW - Nurses and allied health care professionals

KW - Online

KW - Theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037707904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13187-017-1308-2

DO - 10.1007/s13187-017-1308-2

M3 - Review article

VL - 34

SP - 339

EP - 356

JO - Journal of Cancer Education

T2 - Journal of Cancer Education

JF - Journal of Cancer Education

SN - 0885-8195

IS - 2

ER -