Effects of negative mood states on risk in everyday decision making

G. R.J. Hockey, A. J. Maule, P. J. Clough, L. Bdzola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How does negative mood affect risk taking? A brief questionnaire was used to measure state anxiety, depression, and fatigue, and a daily mood diary allowed state and trait (average level) mood to be separated. Studies 1 and 2 used natural moods and Study 3 a mood induction procedure. Risk was assessed using hypothetical everyday choice scenarios. Study 1 showed that riskiness was affected by state fatigue, but not by anxiety and depression. Study 2 showed that increased riskiness over a two-week period was predicted by fatigue changes, after controlling for riskiness and trait and state mood at time 1. Fatigue effects were stronger for more important scenarios, and when state anxiety was also high. In Study 3, covariance analyses showed that the observed increased in riskiness was related to induced fatigue, rather than to anxiety or depression. The effects are discussed in relation to the literature on fatigue effects, and models of mood and cognition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)823-856
Number of pages34
JournalCognition and Emotion
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Nov 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Fatigue
Anxiety
Depression
Risk-Taking
Mood
Cognition

Cite this

Hockey, G. R.J. ; Maule, A. J. ; Clough, P. J. ; Bdzola, L. / Effects of negative mood states on risk in everyday decision making. In: Cognition and Emotion. 2000 ; Vol. 14, No. 6. pp. 823-856.
@article{742e72119fa94627bf073b182a30aa4d,
title = "Effects of negative mood states on risk in everyday decision making",
abstract = "How does negative mood affect risk taking? A brief questionnaire was used to measure state anxiety, depression, and fatigue, and a daily mood diary allowed state and trait (average level) mood to be separated. Studies 1 and 2 used natural moods and Study 3 a mood induction procedure. Risk was assessed using hypothetical everyday choice scenarios. Study 1 showed that riskiness was affected by state fatigue, but not by anxiety and depression. Study 2 showed that increased riskiness over a two-week period was predicted by fatigue changes, after controlling for riskiness and trait and state mood at time 1. Fatigue effects were stronger for more important scenarios, and when state anxiety was also high. In Study 3, covariance analyses showed that the observed increased in riskiness was related to induced fatigue, rather than to anxiety or depression. The effects are discussed in relation to the literature on fatigue effects, and models of mood and cognition.",
author = "Hockey, {G. R.J.} and Maule, {A. J.} and Clough, {P. J.} and L. Bdzola",
year = "2000",
month = "11",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/02699930050156654",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "823--856",
journal = "Cognition and Emotion",
issn = "0269-9931",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Effects of negative mood states on risk in everyday decision making. / Hockey, G. R.J.; Maule, A. J.; Clough, P. J.; Bdzola, L.

In: Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 14, No. 6, 23.11.2000, p. 823-856.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of negative mood states on risk in everyday decision making

AU - Hockey, G. R.J.

AU - Maule, A. J.

AU - Clough, P. J.

AU - Bdzola, L.

PY - 2000/11/23

Y1 - 2000/11/23

N2 - How does negative mood affect risk taking? A brief questionnaire was used to measure state anxiety, depression, and fatigue, and a daily mood diary allowed state and trait (average level) mood to be separated. Studies 1 and 2 used natural moods and Study 3 a mood induction procedure. Risk was assessed using hypothetical everyday choice scenarios. Study 1 showed that riskiness was affected by state fatigue, but not by anxiety and depression. Study 2 showed that increased riskiness over a two-week period was predicted by fatigue changes, after controlling for riskiness and trait and state mood at time 1. Fatigue effects were stronger for more important scenarios, and when state anxiety was also high. In Study 3, covariance analyses showed that the observed increased in riskiness was related to induced fatigue, rather than to anxiety or depression. The effects are discussed in relation to the literature on fatigue effects, and models of mood and cognition.

AB - How does negative mood affect risk taking? A brief questionnaire was used to measure state anxiety, depression, and fatigue, and a daily mood diary allowed state and trait (average level) mood to be separated. Studies 1 and 2 used natural moods and Study 3 a mood induction procedure. Risk was assessed using hypothetical everyday choice scenarios. Study 1 showed that riskiness was affected by state fatigue, but not by anxiety and depression. Study 2 showed that increased riskiness over a two-week period was predicted by fatigue changes, after controlling for riskiness and trait and state mood at time 1. Fatigue effects were stronger for more important scenarios, and when state anxiety was also high. In Study 3, covariance analyses showed that the observed increased in riskiness was related to induced fatigue, rather than to anxiety or depression. The effects are discussed in relation to the literature on fatigue effects, and models of mood and cognition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033758296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699930050156654

DO - 10.1080/02699930050156654

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 823

EP - 856

JO - Cognition and Emotion

JF - Cognition and Emotion

SN - 0269-9931

IS - 6

ER -