Embedded inverted interrogatives

Investigating the acquisition of non-canonical embedded questions

Rebecca Woods

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The last thirty or so years have seen important advances made in the understanding of how children, particularly English-acquiring children, form and understand questions, with no small contribution coming out of UMass Amherst, led by Tom Roeper, and Smith, led by Jill and Peter de Villiers. The domain of embedded questions in acquisition has underscored and provided evidence for key theoretical analyses of successive cyclic movement in the formation of wh-questions, as well as shedding light on the linguistic and cognitive advances made by children in their earliest years. In this paper I examine a form of non-canonical embedded question known as embedded inverted questions (EIQs), in which embedded interrogatives feature subject-auxiliary inversion, amongst other properties, as outlined in section 2. In section 3, I give an overview of established knowledge about children’s comprehension of embedded questions to highlight areas where recent descriptive and theoretical innovation could shed more light. Focusing on mainstream American English, a dialect in which EIQs are known to be produced but are generally judged ungrammatical by adult speakers, I present in section 4 a small-scale study which shows that children acquiring this dialect interpret and respond to EIQs in the same way that they respond to typical embedded questions: they do not use the inversion inherent in EIQs to interpret embedded questions as islands. Work by de Villiers, de Villiers and Roeper (2011) suggests, however, that there are contexts in which EIQs may accelerate adult-like interpretation of embedded questions by children, and the links between their work and this study are discussed in section 5.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationUMOP 41
Subtitle of host publicationT.O.M and Grammar: Thoughts on Mind and Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Tom Roeper
EditorsBart Hollebrandse, Jaieun Kim, Ana T. Pérez-Leroux, Petra Schulz
Place of PublicationMassachusetts
PublisherGLSA
Chapter18
Pages179-194
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)9781729520659, 1729520650
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

dialect
comprehension
innovation
linguistics
interpretation
evidence

Cite this

Woods, R. (2019). Embedded inverted interrogatives: Investigating the acquisition of non-canonical embedded questions. In B. Hollebrandse, J. Kim, A. T. Pérez-Leroux, & P. Schulz (Eds.), UMOP 41: T.O.M and Grammar: Thoughts on Mind and Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Tom Roeper (pp. 179-194). Massachusetts: GLSA.
Woods, Rebecca. / Embedded inverted interrogatives : Investigating the acquisition of non-canonical embedded questions. UMOP 41: T.O.M and Grammar: Thoughts on Mind and Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Tom Roeper. editor / Bart Hollebrandse ; Jaieun Kim ; Ana T. Pérez-Leroux ; Petra Schulz. Massachusetts : GLSA, 2019. pp. 179-194
@inbook{1b44c28160de4b1ca9d974c842c5a772,
title = "Embedded inverted interrogatives: Investigating the acquisition of non-canonical embedded questions",
abstract = "The last thirty or so years have seen important advances made in the understanding of how children, particularly English-acquiring children, form and understand questions, with no small contribution coming out of UMass Amherst, led by Tom Roeper, and Smith, led by Jill and Peter de Villiers. The domain of embedded questions in acquisition has underscored and provided evidence for key theoretical analyses of successive cyclic movement in the formation of wh-questions, as well as shedding light on the linguistic and cognitive advances made by children in their earliest years. In this paper I examine a form of non-canonical embedded question known as embedded inverted questions (EIQs), in which embedded interrogatives feature subject-auxiliary inversion, amongst other properties, as outlined in section 2. In section 3, I give an overview of established knowledge about children’s comprehension of embedded questions to highlight areas where recent descriptive and theoretical innovation could shed more light. Focusing on mainstream American English, a dialect in which EIQs are known to be produced but are generally judged ungrammatical by adult speakers, I present in section 4 a small-scale study which shows that children acquiring this dialect interpret and respond to EIQs in the same way that they respond to typical embedded questions: they do not use the inversion inherent in EIQs to interpret embedded questions as islands. Work by de Villiers, de Villiers and Roeper (2011) suggests, however, that there are contexts in which EIQs may accelerate adult-like interpretation of embedded questions by children, and the links between their work and this study are discussed in section 5.",
author = "Rebecca Woods",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "22",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781729520659",
pages = "179--194",
editor = "Bart Hollebrandse and Jaieun Kim and P{\'e}rez-Leroux, {Ana T.} and Petra Schulz",
booktitle = "UMOP 41",
publisher = "GLSA",

}

Woods, R 2019, Embedded inverted interrogatives: Investigating the acquisition of non-canonical embedded questions. in B Hollebrandse, J Kim, AT Pérez-Leroux & P Schulz (eds), UMOP 41: T.O.M and Grammar: Thoughts on Mind and Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Tom Roeper. GLSA, Massachusetts, pp. 179-194.

Embedded inverted interrogatives : Investigating the acquisition of non-canonical embedded questions. / Woods, Rebecca.

UMOP 41: T.O.M and Grammar: Thoughts on Mind and Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Tom Roeper. ed. / Bart Hollebrandse; Jaieun Kim; Ana T. Pérez-Leroux; Petra Schulz. Massachusetts : GLSA, 2019. p. 179-194.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Embedded inverted interrogatives

T2 - Investigating the acquisition of non-canonical embedded questions

AU - Woods, Rebecca

PY - 2019/1/22

Y1 - 2019/1/22

N2 - The last thirty or so years have seen important advances made in the understanding of how children, particularly English-acquiring children, form and understand questions, with no small contribution coming out of UMass Amherst, led by Tom Roeper, and Smith, led by Jill and Peter de Villiers. The domain of embedded questions in acquisition has underscored and provided evidence for key theoretical analyses of successive cyclic movement in the formation of wh-questions, as well as shedding light on the linguistic and cognitive advances made by children in their earliest years. In this paper I examine a form of non-canonical embedded question known as embedded inverted questions (EIQs), in which embedded interrogatives feature subject-auxiliary inversion, amongst other properties, as outlined in section 2. In section 3, I give an overview of established knowledge about children’s comprehension of embedded questions to highlight areas where recent descriptive and theoretical innovation could shed more light. Focusing on mainstream American English, a dialect in which EIQs are known to be produced but are generally judged ungrammatical by adult speakers, I present in section 4 a small-scale study which shows that children acquiring this dialect interpret and respond to EIQs in the same way that they respond to typical embedded questions: they do not use the inversion inherent in EIQs to interpret embedded questions as islands. Work by de Villiers, de Villiers and Roeper (2011) suggests, however, that there are contexts in which EIQs may accelerate adult-like interpretation of embedded questions by children, and the links between their work and this study are discussed in section 5.

AB - The last thirty or so years have seen important advances made in the understanding of how children, particularly English-acquiring children, form and understand questions, with no small contribution coming out of UMass Amherst, led by Tom Roeper, and Smith, led by Jill and Peter de Villiers. The domain of embedded questions in acquisition has underscored and provided evidence for key theoretical analyses of successive cyclic movement in the formation of wh-questions, as well as shedding light on the linguistic and cognitive advances made by children in their earliest years. In this paper I examine a form of non-canonical embedded question known as embedded inverted questions (EIQs), in which embedded interrogatives feature subject-auxiliary inversion, amongst other properties, as outlined in section 2. In section 3, I give an overview of established knowledge about children’s comprehension of embedded questions to highlight areas where recent descriptive and theoretical innovation could shed more light. Focusing on mainstream American English, a dialect in which EIQs are known to be produced but are generally judged ungrammatical by adult speakers, I present in section 4 a small-scale study which shows that children acquiring this dialect interpret and respond to EIQs in the same way that they respond to typical embedded questions: they do not use the inversion inherent in EIQs to interpret embedded questions as islands. Work by de Villiers, de Villiers and Roeper (2011) suggests, however, that there are contexts in which EIQs may accelerate adult-like interpretation of embedded questions by children, and the links between their work and this study are discussed in section 5.

UR - http://glsa.hypermart.net/cgi-bin/list.cgi?ALL%UMOP41%5%N

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781729520659

SN - 1729520650

SP - 179

EP - 194

BT - UMOP 41

A2 - Hollebrandse, Bart

A2 - Kim, Jaieun

A2 - Pérez-Leroux, Ana T.

A2 - Schulz, Petra

PB - GLSA

CY - Massachusetts

ER -

Woods R. Embedded inverted interrogatives: Investigating the acquisition of non-canonical embedded questions. In Hollebrandse B, Kim J, Pérez-Leroux AT, Schulz P, editors, UMOP 41: T.O.M and Grammar: Thoughts on Mind and Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Tom Roeper. Massachusetts: GLSA. 2019. p. 179-194