Embedding Responsible Management Education

Staff, Student and Institutional Perspectives

Eshani Beddewela, Charlotte Warin, Fiona Hesselden, Alexandra Coslet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a resurgence in responsible management education, with business schools' considering its adoption as vital for business courses. Nevertheless, initiating institution-wide changes for responsible management education is an inherently complex activity in business schools, requiring not only revisions in their curriculum, but also sustained faculty and institutional support. This paper explores this complexity in one UK business school, a signatory to the Principles of Responsible Management Education, who have commenced a programme of change in RME. Based on primary data obtained from two workshops with the business schools' faculty, a student survey and a systematic analysis of the curriculum of four undergraduate degrees and two post-graduate degrees, we find that misalignment between faculty skills and institutional bureaucracy, together with an inconsistent focus on responsible management across the curriculum raises key challenges for its adoption. We extend the premise that significant change in RME, requires fundamental changes of a business school's own ethos of what responsibility means to itself.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-279
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Management Education
Volume15
Issue number2B
Early online date15 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017

Fingerprint

business school
staff
management
education
student
curriculum
bureaucracy
graduate
Staff
Business schools
Management education
Institutional perspective
responsibility
Curriculum

Cite this

@article{8fc95f26e1c941398a4a30244b972dd7,
title = "Embedding Responsible Management Education: Staff, Student and Institutional Perspectives",
abstract = "There is a resurgence in responsible management education, with business schools' considering its adoption as vital for business courses. Nevertheless, initiating institution-wide changes for responsible management education is an inherently complex activity in business schools, requiring not only revisions in their curriculum, but also sustained faculty and institutional support. This paper explores this complexity in one UK business school, a signatory to the Principles of Responsible Management Education, who have commenced a programme of change in RME. Based on primary data obtained from two workshops with the business schools' faculty, a student survey and a systematic analysis of the curriculum of four undergraduate degrees and two post-graduate degrees, we find that misalignment between faculty skills and institutional bureaucracy, together with an inconsistent focus on responsible management across the curriculum raises key challenges for its adoption. We extend the premise that significant change in RME, requires fundamental changes of a business school's own ethos of what responsibility means to itself.",
keywords = "Responsible management education, Business schools, Curriculum design, Principles of Responsible Management Education, PRME, Education for sustainable development",
author = "Eshani Beddewela and Charlotte Warin and Fiona Hesselden and Alexandra Coslet",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.013",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "263--279",
journal = "International Journal of Management Education",
issn = "1472-8117",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2B",

}

Embedding Responsible Management Education : Staff, Student and Institutional Perspectives. / Beddewela, Eshani; Warin, Charlotte; Hesselden, Fiona; Coslet, Alexandra.

In: International Journal of Management Education, Vol. 15, No. 2B, 07.2017, p. 263-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embedding Responsible Management Education

T2 - Staff, Student and Institutional Perspectives

AU - Beddewela, Eshani

AU - Warin, Charlotte

AU - Hesselden, Fiona

AU - Coslet, Alexandra

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - There is a resurgence in responsible management education, with business schools' considering its adoption as vital for business courses. Nevertheless, initiating institution-wide changes for responsible management education is an inherently complex activity in business schools, requiring not only revisions in their curriculum, but also sustained faculty and institutional support. This paper explores this complexity in one UK business school, a signatory to the Principles of Responsible Management Education, who have commenced a programme of change in RME. Based on primary data obtained from two workshops with the business schools' faculty, a student survey and a systematic analysis of the curriculum of four undergraduate degrees and two post-graduate degrees, we find that misalignment between faculty skills and institutional bureaucracy, together with an inconsistent focus on responsible management across the curriculum raises key challenges for its adoption. We extend the premise that significant change in RME, requires fundamental changes of a business school's own ethos of what responsibility means to itself.

AB - There is a resurgence in responsible management education, with business schools' considering its adoption as vital for business courses. Nevertheless, initiating institution-wide changes for responsible management education is an inherently complex activity in business schools, requiring not only revisions in their curriculum, but also sustained faculty and institutional support. This paper explores this complexity in one UK business school, a signatory to the Principles of Responsible Management Education, who have commenced a programme of change in RME. Based on primary data obtained from two workshops with the business schools' faculty, a student survey and a systematic analysis of the curriculum of four undergraduate degrees and two post-graduate degrees, we find that misalignment between faculty skills and institutional bureaucracy, together with an inconsistent focus on responsible management across the curriculum raises key challenges for its adoption. We extend the premise that significant change in RME, requires fundamental changes of a business school's own ethos of what responsibility means to itself.

KW - Responsible management education

KW - Business schools

KW - Curriculum design

KW - Principles of Responsible Management Education

KW - PRME

KW - Education for sustainable development

UR - https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-international-journal-of-management-education

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.013

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 263

EP - 279

JO - International Journal of Management Education

JF - International Journal of Management Education

SN - 1472-8117

IS - 2B

ER -