Embodying Empathy: A Phenomenological Study of Physician Touch

Martina Kelly, Clark Svrcek, Nigel King, Albert Scherpbier, Timothy Dornan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Empathic physician behavior is associated with improved patient outcomes. One way to demonstrate empathy is through nonverbal communication including touch. To date, research on nonverbal communication, and specifically touch, has been relatively limited in medicine, which is surprising given the central role it plays in conveying affective and empathic messages. To inform curriculum development on nonverbal communication, this study aimed to examine physicians’ experiences of communicating with touch.

Methods: Interpretative phenomenological study. Fifteen physicians (7 women and 8 men), from different specialties, both recent graduates and experienced doctors, described in detail specific instances of touch drawn from their clinical practices. Interview prompts encouraged participants to recall exact details such as the context, their relationship with the patient they touched, and their physical experience of touching. Interviews (45-100 mins) were analyzed with template analysis, followed by a process of dialectic questioning, moving back and forth between the data and researchers’ personal reflections on them, drawing on phenomenological literature to synthesize a final interpretation.

Findings: Participants described two dimensions of the experience of touch, ‘choosing and inviting touch’ and ‘expressing empathy’. Touch was a personal and fragile process. Participants interpreted nonverbal patient cues to determine whether or not touch was appropriate. They interpreted facial expression and body language in the here and now, to make meaning of patients’ experiences. They used touch to share emotions, demonstrate empathy and presence. Participants’ experiences of touch framed it as a form of embodied empathic communication.

Conclusion: Touch was a powerful form of nonverbal communication which established human connection. Phenomenological accounts of empathy, which emphasize its embodied intersubjective nature, could be used to theoretically enrich pedagogical approaches to touch in medical education and deepen our understanding of empathy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalMedical Education
Early online date3 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

non-verbal communication
empathy
physician
experience
body language
facial expression
curriculum development
interview
dialectics
emotion
graduate
medicine
interpretation
communication
education

Cite this

Kelly, Martina ; Svrcek, Clark ; King, Nigel ; Scherpbier, Albert ; Dornan, Timothy. / Embodying Empathy : A Phenomenological Study of Physician Touch. In: Medical Education. 2019.
@article{6a3c893279534ba8b9bc6b717463b581,
title = "Embodying Empathy: A Phenomenological Study of Physician Touch",
abstract = "Introduction: Empathic physician behavior is associated with improved patient outcomes. One way to demonstrate empathy is through nonverbal communication including touch. To date, research on nonverbal communication, and specifically touch, has been relatively limited in medicine, which is surprising given the central role it plays in conveying affective and empathic messages. To inform curriculum development on nonverbal communication, this study aimed to examine physicians’ experiences of communicating with touch.Methods: Interpretative phenomenological study. Fifteen physicians (7 women and 8 men), from different specialties, both recent graduates and experienced doctors, described in detail specific instances of touch drawn from their clinical practices. Interview prompts encouraged participants to recall exact details such as the context, their relationship with the patient they touched, and their physical experience of touching. Interviews (45-100 mins) were analyzed with template analysis, followed by a process of dialectic questioning, moving back and forth between the data and researchers’ personal reflections on them, drawing on phenomenological literature to synthesize a final interpretation. Findings: Participants described two dimensions of the experience of touch, ‘choosing and inviting touch’ and ‘expressing empathy’. Touch was a personal and fragile process. Participants interpreted nonverbal patient cues to determine whether or not touch was appropriate. They interpreted facial expression and body language in the here and now, to make meaning of patients’ experiences. They used touch to share emotions, demonstrate empathy and presence. Participants’ experiences of touch framed it as a form of embodied empathic communication.Conclusion: Touch was a powerful form of nonverbal communication which established human connection. Phenomenological accounts of empathy, which emphasize its embodied intersubjective nature, could be used to theoretically enrich pedagogical approaches to touch in medical education and deepen our understanding of empathy.",
keywords = "touch, communication, empathy, physician, phenomenology, nonverbal, nonverbal communication",
author = "Martina Kelly and Clark Svrcek and Nigel King and Albert Scherpbier and Timothy Dornan",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1111/medu.14040",
language = "English",
journal = "Medical Education",
issn = "0308-0110",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Embodying Empathy : A Phenomenological Study of Physician Touch. / Kelly, Martina; Svrcek, Clark; King, Nigel; Scherpbier, Albert; Dornan, Timothy.

In: Medical Education, 03.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embodying Empathy

T2 - A Phenomenological Study of Physician Touch

AU - Kelly, Martina

AU - Svrcek, Clark

AU - King, Nigel

AU - Scherpbier, Albert

AU - Dornan, Timothy

PY - 2019/12/3

Y1 - 2019/12/3

N2 - Introduction: Empathic physician behavior is associated with improved patient outcomes. One way to demonstrate empathy is through nonverbal communication including touch. To date, research on nonverbal communication, and specifically touch, has been relatively limited in medicine, which is surprising given the central role it plays in conveying affective and empathic messages. To inform curriculum development on nonverbal communication, this study aimed to examine physicians’ experiences of communicating with touch.Methods: Interpretative phenomenological study. Fifteen physicians (7 women and 8 men), from different specialties, both recent graduates and experienced doctors, described in detail specific instances of touch drawn from their clinical practices. Interview prompts encouraged participants to recall exact details such as the context, their relationship with the patient they touched, and their physical experience of touching. Interviews (45-100 mins) were analyzed with template analysis, followed by a process of dialectic questioning, moving back and forth between the data and researchers’ personal reflections on them, drawing on phenomenological literature to synthesize a final interpretation. Findings: Participants described two dimensions of the experience of touch, ‘choosing and inviting touch’ and ‘expressing empathy’. Touch was a personal and fragile process. Participants interpreted nonverbal patient cues to determine whether or not touch was appropriate. They interpreted facial expression and body language in the here and now, to make meaning of patients’ experiences. They used touch to share emotions, demonstrate empathy and presence. Participants’ experiences of touch framed it as a form of embodied empathic communication.Conclusion: Touch was a powerful form of nonverbal communication which established human connection. Phenomenological accounts of empathy, which emphasize its embodied intersubjective nature, could be used to theoretically enrich pedagogical approaches to touch in medical education and deepen our understanding of empathy.

AB - Introduction: Empathic physician behavior is associated with improved patient outcomes. One way to demonstrate empathy is through nonverbal communication including touch. To date, research on nonverbal communication, and specifically touch, has been relatively limited in medicine, which is surprising given the central role it plays in conveying affective and empathic messages. To inform curriculum development on nonverbal communication, this study aimed to examine physicians’ experiences of communicating with touch.Methods: Interpretative phenomenological study. Fifteen physicians (7 women and 8 men), from different specialties, both recent graduates and experienced doctors, described in detail specific instances of touch drawn from their clinical practices. Interview prompts encouraged participants to recall exact details such as the context, their relationship with the patient they touched, and their physical experience of touching. Interviews (45-100 mins) were analyzed with template analysis, followed by a process of dialectic questioning, moving back and forth between the data and researchers’ personal reflections on them, drawing on phenomenological literature to synthesize a final interpretation. Findings: Participants described two dimensions of the experience of touch, ‘choosing and inviting touch’ and ‘expressing empathy’. Touch was a personal and fragile process. Participants interpreted nonverbal patient cues to determine whether or not touch was appropriate. They interpreted facial expression and body language in the here and now, to make meaning of patients’ experiences. They used touch to share emotions, demonstrate empathy and presence. Participants’ experiences of touch framed it as a form of embodied empathic communication.Conclusion: Touch was a powerful form of nonverbal communication which established human connection. Phenomenological accounts of empathy, which emphasize its embodied intersubjective nature, could be used to theoretically enrich pedagogical approaches to touch in medical education and deepen our understanding of empathy.

KW - touch

KW - communication

KW - empathy

KW - physician

KW - phenomenology

KW - nonverbal

KW - nonverbal communication

U2 - 10.1111/medu.14040

DO - 10.1111/medu.14040

M3 - Article

JO - Medical Education

JF - Medical Education

SN - 0308-0110

ER -