Empirically Derived Subgroups of Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behavior: Application of Latent Class Analysis

Katie Dhingra, Daniel Boduszek, E. David Klonsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)


Latent class analysis was applied to the sample data to identify homogenous subtypes or classes of self-injurious thoughts and behavior (SITB) based on indicators indexing suicide ideation, suicide gesture, suicide attempt, thoughts of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), and NSSI behavior. Analyses were based on a sample of 1,809 healthy adults. Associations between the emergent latent classes and demographic, psychological, and clinical characteristics were assessed. Two clinically relevant subtypes were identified, in addition to a class who reported few SITBs, and were labeled as follows: low SITBs (25.8%), NSSI and ideation (25%), and suicidal behavior (29.2%). Several unique differences between the latent classes and external measures emerged. For instance, those belonging to the NSSI and ideation class compared with the suicidal behavior class reported lower levels of entrapment, burdensomeness, fearlessness about death, exposure to the attempted suicide or self-injury of family members and close friends, and higher levels of goal disengagement and acute agitation. SITBs are best explained by three homogenous subgroups that display quantitative and qualitative differences. Profiling the behavioral and cognitive components of suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury is potentially useful as a first step in developing tailored intervention and treatment programs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)486-499
Number of pages14
JournalSuicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Empirically Derived Subgroups of Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behavior: Application of Latent Class Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this