Employee Representation in Building Societies

Jonathan Winterton, Ruth Winterton

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

White‐collar trade unionism has aroused considerable interest among students of industrial relations, but relatively little attention has been paid to staff associations, which Crompton noted perform similar functions to trade unions and to which white‐collar workers are partial. At present, white‐collar and partly white‐collar unions account for roughly half of the unions in Britain and some 35 per cent of the membership. The density of white‐collar membership has increased to 40 per cent (over 50 per cent if staff and professional associations are included), compared with 53 per cent for manual workers. White‐collar workers are traditionally thought to be less disposed to join trade unions and, as Bain et al note, “when white collar workers do unionize, they are believed to carry with them certain aspects of the status ideology which affects the behaviour of their unions”. Blackburn and Prandy offer a theoretical framework which may be used to compare the “unionateness” of white‐collar and manual forms of employee representation. Most white‐collar unions satisfy the criteria of unionateness, but a large proportion of staff associations fail on the question of independence from employers for the purposes of negotiation. In the first four years of his appointment, the Certification Officer refused certificates of independence to fifty‐one organisations, all of them staff associations.
LanguageEnglish
Pages11-16
Number of pages6
JournalEmployee Relations
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Staff
Building societies
Employee representation
White-collar workers
Trade unions
Proportion
Industrial relations
Join
Certification
Ideology
Trade unionism
Workers
Employers
Theoretical framework
Professional associations

Cite this

Winterton, Jonathan ; Winterton, Ruth. / Employee Representation in Building Societies. In: Employee Relations. 1982 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 11-16.
@article{98125d1f51ef42fe87470c870506769e,
title = "Employee Representation in Building Societies",
abstract = "White‐collar trade unionism has aroused considerable interest among students of industrial relations, but relatively little attention has been paid to staff associations, which Crompton noted perform similar functions to trade unions and to which white‐collar workers are partial. At present, white‐collar and partly white‐collar unions account for roughly half of the unions in Britain and some 35 per cent of the membership. The density of white‐collar membership has increased to 40 per cent (over 50 per cent if staff and professional associations are included), compared with 53 per cent for manual workers. White‐collar workers are traditionally thought to be less disposed to join trade unions and, as Bain et al note, “when white collar workers do unionize, they are believed to carry with them certain aspects of the status ideology which affects the behaviour of their unions”. Blackburn and Prandy offer a theoretical framework which may be used to compare the “unionateness” of white‐collar and manual forms of employee representation. Most white‐collar unions satisfy the criteria of unionateness, but a large proportion of staff associations fail on the question of independence from employers for the purposes of negotiation. In the first four years of his appointment, the Certification Officer refused certificates of independence to fifty‐one organisations, all of them staff associations.",
author = "Jonathan Winterton and Ruth Winterton",
year = "1982",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/eb054991",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "11--16",
journal = "Employee Relations",
issn = "0142-5455",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Employee Representation in Building Societies. / Winterton, Jonathan; Winterton, Ruth.

In: Employee Relations, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.02.1982, p. 11-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employee Representation in Building Societies

AU - Winterton, Jonathan

AU - Winterton, Ruth

PY - 1982/2/1

Y1 - 1982/2/1

N2 - White‐collar trade unionism has aroused considerable interest among students of industrial relations, but relatively little attention has been paid to staff associations, which Crompton noted perform similar functions to trade unions and to which white‐collar workers are partial. At present, white‐collar and partly white‐collar unions account for roughly half of the unions in Britain and some 35 per cent of the membership. The density of white‐collar membership has increased to 40 per cent (over 50 per cent if staff and professional associations are included), compared with 53 per cent for manual workers. White‐collar workers are traditionally thought to be less disposed to join trade unions and, as Bain et al note, “when white collar workers do unionize, they are believed to carry with them certain aspects of the status ideology which affects the behaviour of their unions”. Blackburn and Prandy offer a theoretical framework which may be used to compare the “unionateness” of white‐collar and manual forms of employee representation. Most white‐collar unions satisfy the criteria of unionateness, but a large proportion of staff associations fail on the question of independence from employers for the purposes of negotiation. In the first four years of his appointment, the Certification Officer refused certificates of independence to fifty‐one organisations, all of them staff associations.

AB - White‐collar trade unionism has aroused considerable interest among students of industrial relations, but relatively little attention has been paid to staff associations, which Crompton noted perform similar functions to trade unions and to which white‐collar workers are partial. At present, white‐collar and partly white‐collar unions account for roughly half of the unions in Britain and some 35 per cent of the membership. The density of white‐collar membership has increased to 40 per cent (over 50 per cent if staff and professional associations are included), compared with 53 per cent for manual workers. White‐collar workers are traditionally thought to be less disposed to join trade unions and, as Bain et al note, “when white collar workers do unionize, they are believed to carry with them certain aspects of the status ideology which affects the behaviour of their unions”. Blackburn and Prandy offer a theoretical framework which may be used to compare the “unionateness” of white‐collar and manual forms of employee representation. Most white‐collar unions satisfy the criteria of unionateness, but a large proportion of staff associations fail on the question of independence from employers for the purposes of negotiation. In the first four years of his appointment, the Certification Officer refused certificates of independence to fifty‐one organisations, all of them staff associations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=6244225026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/eb054991

DO - 10.1108/eb054991

M3 - Review article

VL - 4

SP - 11

EP - 16

JO - Employee Relations

T2 - Employee Relations

JF - Employee Relations

SN - 0142-5455

IS - 2

ER -