Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental (4E) assessment of power cycles integrated with anaerobic digester

Arian Shabruhi Mishamandani, Faisal Asfand, Sulaiman O. Fadlallah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As the world struggles with climate change, biogas produced via anaerobic digestion (AD) offers a promising sustainable energy solution. While numerous studies have explored integrating AD with heat-to-power generation systems, a key gap remains in understanding how biomass affects overall system performance. In particular, through comprehensive energy, exergy, economy, and environmental (4E) assessments which are essential for a more accurate system modelling, and system optimization. To address this gap, this research evaluated five biogas-powered configurations: gas turbine cycle (GT), organic Rankine cycle (ORC), ORC with an internal regenerator (ORC-IG), supercritical carbon dioxide (SCO2), and SCO2 with a recuperator (SCO2-R). These systems were assessed and compared based on energy and exergy efficiency, total annual cost, CO2 emissions, and CO2 equivalent emission. Among them, the GT-SCO2-R system delivered the best overall performance, achieving the highest thermal and exergy efficiencies (44.33% and 43.0%, respectively), maximum net power output (11,078 kW), the shortest payback period (1.72 years), and the greatest CO2 emissions reduction (13,515 tCO2/year). It also compares alternative waste management methods and outlines critical factors for policymakers. The analysis also revealed that the digestion plant caused the highest exergy destruction, indicating the need for technological improvements at this stage. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of biogas system performance and provides valuable insights into design optimization. It also compares alternative waste management methods and outlines critical factors for policymakers. The findings support the strategic advancement of biogas as a viable path toward sustainable energy production.
Original languageEnglish
Article number139069
Number of pages26
JournalEnergy
Volume340
Early online date7 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental (4E) assessment of power cycles integrated with anaerobic digester'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this