Entrepreneurship and the small to medium-sized enterprise

A divergent/convergent paradox in thinking patterns between advisers and SME owner-managers

John Day, Paul Reynolds, Geoff Lancaster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to suggest a framework for competing theories of entrepreneurship but to argue for transparency in one's attempts to understand this phenomenon. Then to argue that, when matching small business advisers to small business, one should consider their entrepreneurial abilities and match as appropriate. A parsimonious method is suggested to measure entrepreneurial ability – divergent thinking. Design/methodology/approach A discussion of entrepreneurship and a proposed matrix that considers the relative entrepreneurial abilities of both partners and is then expanded to account for different decision scenarios. Findings A simple test for divergent thinking is suggested to measure entrepreneurship, applied to some hypothetical scenarios, and is supported by some broad evidence on the relationship between small businesses and commercial banks. Research limitations/implications At this stage a conceptual article but with real implications for managing SME and adviser relationships. Practical implications Should lead to a better understanding by both the SME and their advisers of what each party needs to contribute to ensure a successful outcome. Originality/value Provides a framework for classifying entrepreneurship and a different perspective on the SME and adviser relationship; suggests a different way from, say, traditional entrepreneurial orientation scales by which to measure entrepreneurial capacity of either the adviser or the SME.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)581-597
Number of pages17
JournalManagement Decision
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Owner-managers
Small to medium-sized enterprises
Paradox
Entrepreneurship
Small and medium-sized enterprises
Small business
Scenarios
Design methodology
Commercial banks
Entrepreneurial orientation
Transparency

Cite this

@article{392ca4e7021f4cad926878bed8768cf8,
title = "Entrepreneurship and the small to medium-sized enterprise: A divergent/convergent paradox in thinking patterns between advisers and SME owner-managers",
abstract = "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to suggest a framework for competing theories of entrepreneurship but to argue for transparency in one's attempts to understand this phenomenon. Then to argue that, when matching small business advisers to small business, one should consider their entrepreneurial abilities and match as appropriate. A parsimonious method is suggested to measure entrepreneurial ability – divergent thinking. Design/methodology/approach A discussion of entrepreneurship and a proposed matrix that considers the relative entrepreneurial abilities of both partners and is then expanded to account for different decision scenarios. Findings A simple test for divergent thinking is suggested to measure entrepreneurship, applied to some hypothetical scenarios, and is supported by some broad evidence on the relationship between small businesses and commercial banks. Research limitations/implications At this stage a conceptual article but with real implications for managing SME and adviser relationships. Practical implications Should lead to a better understanding by both the SME and their advisers of what each party needs to contribute to ensure a successful outcome. Originality/value Provides a framework for classifying entrepreneurship and a different perspective on the SME and adviser relationship; suggests a different way from, say, traditional entrepreneurial orientation scales by which to measure entrepreneurial capacity of either the adviser or the SME.",
keywords = "Commercial banks, Entrepreneurs, Medium-sized enterprises, Small enterprises",
author = "John Day and Paul Reynolds and Geoff Lancaster",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1108/00251740610668851",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "581--597",
journal = "Management Decision",
issn = "0025-1747",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Entrepreneurship and the small to medium-sized enterprise : A divergent/convergent paradox in thinking patterns between advisers and SME owner-managers. / Day, John; Reynolds, Paul; Lancaster, Geoff.

In: Management Decision, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2006, p. 581-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Entrepreneurship and the small to medium-sized enterprise

T2 - A divergent/convergent paradox in thinking patterns between advisers and SME owner-managers

AU - Day, John

AU - Reynolds, Paul

AU - Lancaster, Geoff

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to suggest a framework for competing theories of entrepreneurship but to argue for transparency in one's attempts to understand this phenomenon. Then to argue that, when matching small business advisers to small business, one should consider their entrepreneurial abilities and match as appropriate. A parsimonious method is suggested to measure entrepreneurial ability – divergent thinking. Design/methodology/approach A discussion of entrepreneurship and a proposed matrix that considers the relative entrepreneurial abilities of both partners and is then expanded to account for different decision scenarios. Findings A simple test for divergent thinking is suggested to measure entrepreneurship, applied to some hypothetical scenarios, and is supported by some broad evidence on the relationship between small businesses and commercial banks. Research limitations/implications At this stage a conceptual article but with real implications for managing SME and adviser relationships. Practical implications Should lead to a better understanding by both the SME and their advisers of what each party needs to contribute to ensure a successful outcome. Originality/value Provides a framework for classifying entrepreneurship and a different perspective on the SME and adviser relationship; suggests a different way from, say, traditional entrepreneurial orientation scales by which to measure entrepreneurial capacity of either the adviser or the SME.

AB - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to suggest a framework for competing theories of entrepreneurship but to argue for transparency in one's attempts to understand this phenomenon. Then to argue that, when matching small business advisers to small business, one should consider their entrepreneurial abilities and match as appropriate. A parsimonious method is suggested to measure entrepreneurial ability – divergent thinking. Design/methodology/approach A discussion of entrepreneurship and a proposed matrix that considers the relative entrepreneurial abilities of both partners and is then expanded to account for different decision scenarios. Findings A simple test for divergent thinking is suggested to measure entrepreneurship, applied to some hypothetical scenarios, and is supported by some broad evidence on the relationship between small businesses and commercial banks. Research limitations/implications At this stage a conceptual article but with real implications for managing SME and adviser relationships. Practical implications Should lead to a better understanding by both the SME and their advisers of what each party needs to contribute to ensure a successful outcome. Originality/value Provides a framework for classifying entrepreneurship and a different perspective on the SME and adviser relationship; suggests a different way from, say, traditional entrepreneurial orientation scales by which to measure entrepreneurial capacity of either the adviser or the SME.

KW - Commercial banks

KW - Entrepreneurs

KW - Medium-sized enterprises

KW - Small enterprises

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646907372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/00251740610668851

DO - 10.1108/00251740610668851

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 581

EP - 597

JO - Management Decision

JF - Management Decision

SN - 0025-1747

IS - 5

ER -