Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ethical Uses of Generative AI in Assessment: Student Perceptions in UK Contexts

Xianghan O'Dea, Richard Bale, Yuan-Li Tiffany Chiu, Kamilya Suleymenova, Amanda Tinker, Ruth Stoker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

University students are increasingly turning to Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools for help with their academic assessments, which has prompted major concerns relating to academic integrity. While Universities globally are building guidance on good practice in the use of GenAI, there is a lack of empirical understanding of student perceptions of what ethical and equitable use means to them. Developing insight into student understanding of GenAI is important in enabling institutions to offer more appropriate training and support to encourage good practice in assessment, not just from the perspective of avoiding malpractice, but in identifying ethical opportunities for integrating the technology as a useful tool. Using the GenAI literacy framework as the theoretical foundation, this paper analysed students’ GenAI usage in academic assessments within the UK context. Data were collected from 80 participants through focus groups conducted by four UK institutions. Our findings show that students are exploring the potential of GenAI as a tool and are beginning to understand where the ethical boundaries might sit. They are keen to use the technology to support their learning but have significant concerns about locating that boundary between good practice and that which exposes them to accusations of cheating, or which limits their own learning. The paper reinforces the importance of providing GenAI literacy training to university students, so they may develop a better understanding of how GenAI can support learning processes in an ethical way.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages25
JournalEvaluation Review
Early online date17 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Nov 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical Uses of Generative AI in Assessment: Student Perceptions in UK Contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this