Abstract
Social media platforms have created digital environments that are systematically harmful to children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults, yet the ethical frameworks governing their conduct remain inadequate, inconsistently enforced, and structurally subordinate to commercial interests. Evidence links social media use to increased rates of anxiety, depression, cyberbullying, disordered eating, and, at its most serious, child sexual exploitation, grooming, and radicalisation. Age verification failures, algorithmic amplification of harmful content, and the absence of meaningful transparency are not incidental design flaws, but foreseeable consequences of platforms built to maximise engagement over welfare. Responding to this evidence, Australia banned under-16s from social media in December 2025, and on 15 June 2026, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced a comparable ban covering Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and X, with over 116,000 public consultation responses, more than 90% in support. The ban offers real protective potential but is not without risk, particularly for young people who rely on social media for connection and support. Practitioners have a professional obligation to engage with this evidence, advocate for robust ethical governance, and contribute to the design of digital environments that genuinely serve the people who use them.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Assessment and Development Matters |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 18 Jun 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics and Social Media: Mapping Harm to Ethical Failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver