Ethics and Society

Attitudes and motives of semen donors and non-donors

S. C. Lui, S. M. Weaver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study surveyed the views of three groups of men in relation to the situation of semen donation. In all, 97 childless student semen donors, 56 childless non-donor students and 44 mature non-donor fathers completed a questionnaire designed to explore possible motives for donating semen and preferences for involvement with recipients and offspring. Results showed the three groups could be discriminated with respect to their views about motivation and involvement in a number of ways. The major findings were: (i) relatively moire donors than non-donors endorsed the importance of financial incentives for donating; (ii) non-donors, who were also fathers, favoured involvement with recipients and offspring more often than did non-fathers (donors and non-donor students); (iii) all groups expressed the importance of confidentiality and guaranteed anonymity. These results are discussed in relation to strategies for donor recruitment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2061-2066
Number of pages6
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume11
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ethics
Tissue Donors
Students
Semen
Fathers
Motivation
Confidentiality

Cite this

@article{cd6189d401604159b26a173968227812,
title = "Ethics and Society: Attitudes and motives of semen donors and non-donors",
abstract = "This study surveyed the views of three groups of men in relation to the situation of semen donation. In all, 97 childless student semen donors, 56 childless non-donor students and 44 mature non-donor fathers completed a questionnaire designed to explore possible motives for donating semen and preferences for involvement with recipients and offspring. Results showed the three groups could be discriminated with respect to their views about motivation and involvement in a number of ways. The major findings were: (i) relatively moire donors than non-donors endorsed the importance of financial incentives for donating; (ii) non-donors, who were also fathers, favoured involvement with recipients and offspring more often than did non-fathers (donors and non-donor students); (iii) all groups expressed the importance of confidentiality and guaranteed anonymity. These results are discussed in relation to strategies for donor recruitment.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Fathers non-donors, Semen donors, Students non-donors",
author = "Lui, {S. C.} and Weaver, {S. M.}",
year = "1996",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019544",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "2061--2066",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "9",

}

Ethics and Society : Attitudes and motives of semen donors and non-donors. / Lui, S. C.; Weaver, S. M.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, No. 9, 01.09.1996, p. 2061-2066.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics and Society

T2 - Attitudes and motives of semen donors and non-donors

AU - Lui, S. C.

AU - Weaver, S. M.

PY - 1996/9/1

Y1 - 1996/9/1

N2 - This study surveyed the views of three groups of men in relation to the situation of semen donation. In all, 97 childless student semen donors, 56 childless non-donor students and 44 mature non-donor fathers completed a questionnaire designed to explore possible motives for donating semen and preferences for involvement with recipients and offspring. Results showed the three groups could be discriminated with respect to their views about motivation and involvement in a number of ways. The major findings were: (i) relatively moire donors than non-donors endorsed the importance of financial incentives for donating; (ii) non-donors, who were also fathers, favoured involvement with recipients and offspring more often than did non-fathers (donors and non-donor students); (iii) all groups expressed the importance of confidentiality and guaranteed anonymity. These results are discussed in relation to strategies for donor recruitment.

AB - This study surveyed the views of three groups of men in relation to the situation of semen donation. In all, 97 childless student semen donors, 56 childless non-donor students and 44 mature non-donor fathers completed a questionnaire designed to explore possible motives for donating semen and preferences for involvement with recipients and offspring. Results showed the three groups could be discriminated with respect to their views about motivation and involvement in a number of ways. The major findings were: (i) relatively moire donors than non-donors endorsed the importance of financial incentives for donating; (ii) non-donors, who were also fathers, favoured involvement with recipients and offspring more often than did non-fathers (donors and non-donor students); (iii) all groups expressed the importance of confidentiality and guaranteed anonymity. These results are discussed in relation to strategies for donor recruitment.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Fathers non-donors

KW - Semen donors

KW - Students non-donors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029841963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019544

DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019544

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 2061

EP - 2066

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 9

ER -