Ethnography, ethics and ownership of data

Lisa Russell, Ruth Barley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Establishing trust and obtaining informed consent with participants is reliant upon on a process whereby unequally positioned agents constantly re-negotiate (mis)trust and consent during ethnographic encounters. All research has been increasingly subject to an intensification in ethical regulation, within a context whereby Eurocentric norms and ethical guidelines arguably diminish individual accountability under the guise of quasi-contractual relationships. This phenomenon has particular implications for ethnography and its management of ethics, given its intimate, longitudinal and receptive nature. Two expert ethnographers working with children and young people draw upon their work to reveal how issues of informed consent and data ownership can shift and be a source of tension and unequal power dynamics. The ethnographer requires autonomy while managing ethics soundly in situ to work within the messiness and unpredictability of participants’ everyday lives.

LanguageEnglish
JournalEthnography
Early online date17 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

ethnography
moral philosophy
everyday life
autonomy
expert
regulation
responsibility
management
Ownership
Ethnography
Informed Consent
Ethnographers
In Situ
Ethnographic
Accountability
Eurocentric
Autonomy
Ethical Guidelines
Consent
Unpredictability

Cite this

@article{4aa3f35b4cae4b6397ecb16b6e43d45c,
title = "Ethnography, ethics and ownership of data",
abstract = "Establishing trust and obtaining informed consent with participants is reliant upon on a process whereby unequally positioned agents constantly re-negotiate (mis)trust and consent during ethnographic encounters. All research has been increasingly subject to an intensification in ethical regulation, within a context whereby Eurocentric norms and ethical guidelines arguably diminish individual accountability under the guise of quasi-contractual relationships. This phenomenon has particular implications for ethnography and its management of ethics, given its intimate, longitudinal and receptive nature. Two expert ethnographers working with children and young people draw upon their work to reveal how issues of informed consent and data ownership can shift and be a source of tension and unequal power dynamics. The ethnographer requires autonomy while managing ethics soundly in situ to work within the messiness and unpredictability of participants’ everyday lives.",
keywords = "Ethnography, Ethics, power, Informed Consent, Data Ownership",
author = "Lisa Russell and Ruth Barley",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1177/1466138119859386",
language = "English",
journal = "Ethnography",
issn = "1466-1381",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Ethnography, ethics and ownership of data. / Russell, Lisa; Barley, Ruth.

In: Ethnography, 17.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnography, ethics and ownership of data

AU - Russell, Lisa

AU - Barley, Ruth

PY - 2019/7/17

Y1 - 2019/7/17

N2 - Establishing trust and obtaining informed consent with participants is reliant upon on a process whereby unequally positioned agents constantly re-negotiate (mis)trust and consent during ethnographic encounters. All research has been increasingly subject to an intensification in ethical regulation, within a context whereby Eurocentric norms and ethical guidelines arguably diminish individual accountability under the guise of quasi-contractual relationships. This phenomenon has particular implications for ethnography and its management of ethics, given its intimate, longitudinal and receptive nature. Two expert ethnographers working with children and young people draw upon their work to reveal how issues of informed consent and data ownership can shift and be a source of tension and unequal power dynamics. The ethnographer requires autonomy while managing ethics soundly in situ to work within the messiness and unpredictability of participants’ everyday lives.

AB - Establishing trust and obtaining informed consent with participants is reliant upon on a process whereby unequally positioned agents constantly re-negotiate (mis)trust and consent during ethnographic encounters. All research has been increasingly subject to an intensification in ethical regulation, within a context whereby Eurocentric norms and ethical guidelines arguably diminish individual accountability under the guise of quasi-contractual relationships. This phenomenon has particular implications for ethnography and its management of ethics, given its intimate, longitudinal and receptive nature. Two expert ethnographers working with children and young people draw upon their work to reveal how issues of informed consent and data ownership can shift and be a source of tension and unequal power dynamics. The ethnographer requires autonomy while managing ethics soundly in situ to work within the messiness and unpredictability of participants’ everyday lives.

KW - Ethnography

KW - Ethics

KW - power

KW - Informed Consent

KW - Data Ownership

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070264618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1466138119859386

DO - 10.1177/1466138119859386

M3 - Article

JO - Ethnography

T2 - Ethnography

JF - Ethnography

SN - 1466-1381

ER -