Evaluating computer assisted learning for renal patients

Karen A. Luker, Ann Louise Caress

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Healthcare professionals have become increasingly concerned with evaluating the impact of their interventions. Consumerism, quality initiatives and financial constraints have contributed in large measure to this concern. Consequently, the focus of many studies which involve the introduction of new and untried techniques is often on demonstrating their relative usefulness. This study sought to evaluate the usefulness and acceptability of computer assisted learning (CAL) for use in the education of renal patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. However, several problems were encountered which limited or impaired the evaluation process. We describe these problems and use them to illustrate the difficulties inherent in evaluative research.

LanguageEnglish
Pages237-250
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis
Patient Education
Learning
Delivery of Health Care
Kidney
Research

Cite this

@article{7378bdd9067749beb8c7d03a2bb1b020,
title = "Evaluating computer assisted learning for renal patients",
abstract = "Healthcare professionals have become increasingly concerned with evaluating the impact of their interventions. Consumerism, quality initiatives and financial constraints have contributed in large measure to this concern. Consequently, the focus of many studies which involve the introduction of new and untried techniques is often on demonstrating their relative usefulness. This study sought to evaluate the usefulness and acceptability of computer assisted learning (CAL) for use in the education of renal patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. However, several problems were encountered which limited or impaired the evaluation process. We describe these problems and use them to illustrate the difficulties inherent in evaluative research.",
author = "Luker, {Karen A.} and Caress, {Ann Louise}",
year = "1992",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0020-7489(92)90027-E",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "237--250",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

Evaluating computer assisted learning for renal patients. / Luker, Karen A.; Caress, Ann Louise.

In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.08.1992, p. 237-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating computer assisted learning for renal patients

AU - Luker, Karen A.

AU - Caress, Ann Louise

PY - 1992/8/1

Y1 - 1992/8/1

N2 - Healthcare professionals have become increasingly concerned with evaluating the impact of their interventions. Consumerism, quality initiatives and financial constraints have contributed in large measure to this concern. Consequently, the focus of many studies which involve the introduction of new and untried techniques is often on demonstrating their relative usefulness. This study sought to evaluate the usefulness and acceptability of computer assisted learning (CAL) for use in the education of renal patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. However, several problems were encountered which limited or impaired the evaluation process. We describe these problems and use them to illustrate the difficulties inherent in evaluative research.

AB - Healthcare professionals have become increasingly concerned with evaluating the impact of their interventions. Consumerism, quality initiatives and financial constraints have contributed in large measure to this concern. Consequently, the focus of many studies which involve the introduction of new and untried techniques is often on demonstrating their relative usefulness. This study sought to evaluate the usefulness and acceptability of computer assisted learning (CAL) for use in the education of renal patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. However, several problems were encountered which limited or impaired the evaluation process. We describe these problems and use them to illustrate the difficulties inherent in evaluative research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026901826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0020-7489(92)90027-E

DO - 10.1016/0020-7489(92)90027-E

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 237

EP - 250

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

T2 - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

SN - 0020-7489

IS - 3

ER -