Evaluating Partnership: The Role of Formal Assessment Tools

Joyce Halliday, Sheena N M Asthana, Susan Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Partnerships are increasingly seeking tools that enable stakeholders to reflect on their own effectiveness, benchmark the status of their partnership and provide a framework for development. Drawing on the evaluation of two Health Action Zones, this article focuses on the use of one such formal assessment tool, adapted from the Nuffield Partnership Assessment Tool and the Verona Benchmark, to explore the contribution of formal tools to our understanding of partnership. It outlines some key methodological limitations and stresses the continued importance of an understanding of context alongside any measurement of partnership effectiveness. It is suggested that formal assessment tools can be extremely valuable in terms of the learning that can result both from the process itself and from the outcomes of the assessment. However, as a stand-alone device they are open to misinterpretation and unlikely to foster development other than in those partnerships prepared to invest the necessary resources in a broad-based evaluation.
LanguageEnglish
Pages285-303
Number of pages19
JournalEvaluation
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

stakeholder
learning
resource
evaluation
health
resources

Cite this

Halliday, Joyce ; Asthana, Sheena N M ; Richardson, Susan. / Evaluating Partnership : The Role of Formal Assessment Tools. In: Evaluation. 2004 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 285-303.
@article{55593dc1371a4899a4f1b01a754319b4,
title = "Evaluating Partnership: The Role of Formal Assessment Tools",
abstract = "Partnerships are increasingly seeking tools that enable stakeholders to reflect on their own effectiveness, benchmark the status of their partnership and provide a framework for development. Drawing on the evaluation of two Health Action Zones, this article focuses on the use of one such formal assessment tool, adapted from the Nuffield Partnership Assessment Tool and the Verona Benchmark, to explore the contribution of formal tools to our understanding of partnership. It outlines some key methodological limitations and stresses the continued importance of an understanding of context alongside any measurement of partnership effectiveness. It is suggested that formal assessment tools can be extremely valuable in terms of the learning that can result both from the process itself and from the outcomes of the assessment. However, as a stand-alone device they are open to misinterpretation and unlikely to foster development other than in those partnerships prepared to invest the necessary resources in a broad-based evaluation.",
keywords = "assessment tools, evaluation, Health Action Zones, measuring partnership",
author = "Joyce Halliday and Asthana, {Sheena N M} and Susan Richardson",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1356389004048279",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "285--303",
journal = "Evaluation",
issn = "1356-3890",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Evaluating Partnership : The Role of Formal Assessment Tools. / Halliday, Joyce; Asthana, Sheena N M; Richardson, Susan.

In: Evaluation, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.07.2004, p. 285-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating Partnership

T2 - Evaluation

AU - Halliday, Joyce

AU - Asthana, Sheena N M

AU - Richardson, Susan

PY - 2004/7/1

Y1 - 2004/7/1

N2 - Partnerships are increasingly seeking tools that enable stakeholders to reflect on their own effectiveness, benchmark the status of their partnership and provide a framework for development. Drawing on the evaluation of two Health Action Zones, this article focuses on the use of one such formal assessment tool, adapted from the Nuffield Partnership Assessment Tool and the Verona Benchmark, to explore the contribution of formal tools to our understanding of partnership. It outlines some key methodological limitations and stresses the continued importance of an understanding of context alongside any measurement of partnership effectiveness. It is suggested that formal assessment tools can be extremely valuable in terms of the learning that can result both from the process itself and from the outcomes of the assessment. However, as a stand-alone device they are open to misinterpretation and unlikely to foster development other than in those partnerships prepared to invest the necessary resources in a broad-based evaluation.

AB - Partnerships are increasingly seeking tools that enable stakeholders to reflect on their own effectiveness, benchmark the status of their partnership and provide a framework for development. Drawing on the evaluation of two Health Action Zones, this article focuses on the use of one such formal assessment tool, adapted from the Nuffield Partnership Assessment Tool and the Verona Benchmark, to explore the contribution of formal tools to our understanding of partnership. It outlines some key methodological limitations and stresses the continued importance of an understanding of context alongside any measurement of partnership effectiveness. It is suggested that formal assessment tools can be extremely valuable in terms of the learning that can result both from the process itself and from the outcomes of the assessment. However, as a stand-alone device they are open to misinterpretation and unlikely to foster development other than in those partnerships prepared to invest the necessary resources in a broad-based evaluation.

KW - assessment tools

KW - evaluation

KW - Health Action Zones

KW - measuring partnership

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645403341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1356389004048279

DO - 10.1177/1356389004048279

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 285

EP - 303

JO - Evaluation

JF - Evaluation

SN - 1356-3890

IS - 3

ER -