Evaluating partnership working: Lessons for palliative care

C. Walshe, A. Caress, C. Chew-Graham, C. Todd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Partnership working in palliative care is being increasingly promoted as the solution to poorly coordinated health and social care services. A key example is the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on supportive and palliative care. However, partnerships have costs in negotiating, developing and maintaining working relationships and translating these into successful outcomes, so may not always be the best or most effective method of service improvement. This article explores structural, procedural, financial, professional and legitimacy barriers to partnership working. We conclude that these five barriers could be sufficient to destroy emerging partnerships. Nowhere in the NICE guidance on supportive and palliative care are such barriers acknowledged. We suggest that current and projected palliative care partnerships should be critically evaluated against both process and outcome success criteria. Such evaluations must be integral to partnerships, to learn about what makes an effective palliative care partnership, and what affects partnerships have on patient care and outcomes. Partnerships may not be the panacea for issues of fragmentation, and should not be the only solution considered. Lessons should be learnt from the UK's promulgation of partnerships to ensure that these are used appropriately and only where patient benefit can be anticipated.

LanguageEnglish
Pages48-54
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer Care
Volume16
Issue number1
Early online date25 Jul 2006
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Illegitimacy
Negotiating
Social Work
Patient Care
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

Walshe, C. ; Caress, A. ; Chew-Graham, C. ; Todd, C. / Evaluating partnership working : Lessons for palliative care. In: European Journal of Cancer Care. 2007 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 48-54.
@article{ffb795afbe3f4e13b4c5f0bbd3c6fbe1,
title = "Evaluating partnership working: Lessons for palliative care",
abstract = "Partnership working in palliative care is being increasingly promoted as the solution to poorly coordinated health and social care services. A key example is the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on supportive and palliative care. However, partnerships have costs in negotiating, developing and maintaining working relationships and translating these into successful outcomes, so may not always be the best or most effective method of service improvement. This article explores structural, procedural, financial, professional and legitimacy barriers to partnership working. We conclude that these five barriers could be sufficient to destroy emerging partnerships. Nowhere in the NICE guidance on supportive and palliative care are such barriers acknowledged. We suggest that current and projected palliative care partnerships should be critically evaluated against both process and outcome success criteria. Such evaluations must be integral to partnerships, to learn about what makes an effective palliative care partnership, and what affects partnerships have on patient care and outcomes. Partnerships may not be the panacea for issues of fragmentation, and should not be the only solution considered. Lessons should be learnt from the UK's promulgation of partnerships to ensure that these are used appropriately and only where patient benefit can be anticipated.",
keywords = "Evaluation, Palliative care, Policy",
author = "C. Walshe and A. Caress and C. Chew-Graham and C. Todd",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00702.x",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "48--54",
journal = "European Journal of Cancer Care",
issn = "0961-5423",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Evaluating partnership working : Lessons for palliative care. / Walshe, C.; Caress, A.; Chew-Graham, C.; Todd, C.

In: European Journal of Cancer Care, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 48-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating partnership working

T2 - European Journal of Cancer Care

AU - Walshe, C.

AU - Caress, A.

AU - Chew-Graham, C.

AU - Todd, C.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Partnership working in palliative care is being increasingly promoted as the solution to poorly coordinated health and social care services. A key example is the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on supportive and palliative care. However, partnerships have costs in negotiating, developing and maintaining working relationships and translating these into successful outcomes, so may not always be the best or most effective method of service improvement. This article explores structural, procedural, financial, professional and legitimacy barriers to partnership working. We conclude that these five barriers could be sufficient to destroy emerging partnerships. Nowhere in the NICE guidance on supportive and palliative care are such barriers acknowledged. We suggest that current and projected palliative care partnerships should be critically evaluated against both process and outcome success criteria. Such evaluations must be integral to partnerships, to learn about what makes an effective palliative care partnership, and what affects partnerships have on patient care and outcomes. Partnerships may not be the panacea for issues of fragmentation, and should not be the only solution considered. Lessons should be learnt from the UK's promulgation of partnerships to ensure that these are used appropriately and only where patient benefit can be anticipated.

AB - Partnership working in palliative care is being increasingly promoted as the solution to poorly coordinated health and social care services. A key example is the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on supportive and palliative care. However, partnerships have costs in negotiating, developing and maintaining working relationships and translating these into successful outcomes, so may not always be the best or most effective method of service improvement. This article explores structural, procedural, financial, professional and legitimacy barriers to partnership working. We conclude that these five barriers could be sufficient to destroy emerging partnerships. Nowhere in the NICE guidance on supportive and palliative care are such barriers acknowledged. We suggest that current and projected palliative care partnerships should be critically evaluated against both process and outcome success criteria. Such evaluations must be integral to partnerships, to learn about what makes an effective palliative care partnership, and what affects partnerships have on patient care and outcomes. Partnerships may not be the panacea for issues of fragmentation, and should not be the only solution considered. Lessons should be learnt from the UK's promulgation of partnerships to ensure that these are used appropriately and only where patient benefit can be anticipated.

KW - Evaluation

KW - Palliative care

KW - Policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846138636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00702.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00702.x

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 48

EP - 54

JO - European Journal of Cancer Care

JF - European Journal of Cancer Care

SN - 0961-5423

IS - 1

ER -