Evaluating the feasibility of commercial arabinoxylan production in the context of a wheat biorefinery principally producing ethanol. Part 2. Process simulation and economic analysis

N. Misailidis, G. M. Campbell, C. Du, J. Sadhukhan, M. Mustafa, F. Mateos-Salvador, R. M. Weightman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the economic feasibility of co-producing an arabinoxylan (AX) product with ethanol from wheat, in order to establish whether, under plausible scenarios, it was realistic that a commercial source of wheat AX could be established. The possibility of recovering wheat bran via pearling was also investigated, both as an opportunity to have bran bypass the main ethanol production process and enter the distillers dried grain with solubles (DDGS) co-product in a dry state, or as a means of obtaining bran for AX extraction. Process flowsheets describing three scenarios were created using SuperPro Designer: conventional wheat-to-bioethanol production with DDGS as the principal co-product; bioethanol production with co-production of AX using conventional hammer milling and sieving to recover the bran for AX extraction; and the use of pearling technology to recover bran for AX extraction. Full economic analysis of each of the three scenarios, considering all capital and operating costs, was undertaken, basing comparisons on a constant return on investment in order to estimate the production costs of AX. 

Sending bran removed via pearling directly to DDGS was not economic; the reduced ethanol yield and increased electricity costs more than offset the savings in drying costs. Simulation of the integrated processes indicated that an AX product of 80% purity could be co-produced with ethanol at a cost of around 3.7-4.5£/kg. This is within the range of comparable viscosity-enhancing ingredients used in the food industry, but is towards the top end of the range. In order to establish a market, AX would therefore need to offer some additional functionality. AX production from bran obtained via pearling was more expensive that from bran obtained via hammer milling and sieving; however, whether the functionality of the AX differs needs to be established. The research indicates that creating a market for AX is feasible in terms of production costs if the AX is co-produced with ethanol. On this basis, further research is justified to investigate the functionality of AX from different sources, to optimise the AX extraction process and to establish the potential of AX as a food or pharmaceutical ingredient.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1239-1250
Number of pages12
JournalChemical Engineering Research and Design
Volume87
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Economic analysis
Ethanol
Bioethanol
Hammers
Costs
Economics
Flowcharting
arabinoxylan
Operating costs
Drug products
Drying
Electricity
Viscosity
Industry

Cite this

@article{eea88bedc5394318ad9bc144cd21a1f5,
title = "Evaluating the feasibility of commercial arabinoxylan production in the context of a wheat biorefinery principally producing ethanol. Part 2. Process simulation and economic analysis",
abstract = "This study investigated the economic feasibility of co-producing an arabinoxylan (AX) product with ethanol from wheat, in order to establish whether, under plausible scenarios, it was realistic that a commercial source of wheat AX could be established. The possibility of recovering wheat bran via pearling was also investigated, both as an opportunity to have bran bypass the main ethanol production process and enter the distillers dried grain with solubles (DDGS) co-product in a dry state, or as a means of obtaining bran for AX extraction. Process flowsheets describing three scenarios were created using SuperPro Designer: conventional wheat-to-bioethanol production with DDGS as the principal co-product; bioethanol production with co-production of AX using conventional hammer milling and sieving to recover the bran for AX extraction; and the use of pearling technology to recover bran for AX extraction. Full economic analysis of each of the three scenarios, considering all capital and operating costs, was undertaken, basing comparisons on a constant return on investment in order to estimate the production costs of AX. Sending bran removed via pearling directly to DDGS was not economic; the reduced ethanol yield and increased electricity costs more than offset the savings in drying costs. Simulation of the integrated processes indicated that an AX product of 80{\%} purity could be co-produced with ethanol at a cost of around 3.7-4.5£/kg. This is within the range of comparable viscosity-enhancing ingredients used in the food industry, but is towards the top end of the range. In order to establish a market, AX would therefore need to offer some additional functionality. AX production from bran obtained via pearling was more expensive that from bran obtained via hammer milling and sieving; however, whether the functionality of the AX differs needs to be established. The research indicates that creating a market for AX is feasible in terms of production costs if the AX is co-produced with ethanol. On this basis, further research is justified to investigate the functionality of AX from different sources, to optimise the AX extraction process and to establish the potential of AX as a food or pharmaceutical ingredient.",
keywords = "Arabinoxylan, Bioethanol, Economic analysis, Process integration, Process simulation, Wheat biorefinery",
author = "N. Misailidis and Campbell, {G. M.} and C. Du and J. Sadhukhan and M. Mustafa and F. Mateos-Salvador and Weightman, {R. M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.cherd.2008.12.028",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "1239--1250",
journal = "Chemical Engineering Research and Design",
issn = "0263-8762",
publisher = "Institution of Chemical Engineers",
number = "9",

}

Evaluating the feasibility of commercial arabinoxylan production in the context of a wheat biorefinery principally producing ethanol. Part 2. Process simulation and economic analysis. / Misailidis, N.; Campbell, G. M.; Du, C.; Sadhukhan, J.; Mustafa, M.; Mateos-Salvador, F.; Weightman, R. M.

In: Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 87, No. 9, 09.2009, p. 1239-1250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the feasibility of commercial arabinoxylan production in the context of a wheat biorefinery principally producing ethanol. Part 2. Process simulation and economic analysis

AU - Misailidis, N.

AU - Campbell, G. M.

AU - Du, C.

AU - Sadhukhan, J.

AU - Mustafa, M.

AU - Mateos-Salvador, F.

AU - Weightman, R. M.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - This study investigated the economic feasibility of co-producing an arabinoxylan (AX) product with ethanol from wheat, in order to establish whether, under plausible scenarios, it was realistic that a commercial source of wheat AX could be established. The possibility of recovering wheat bran via pearling was also investigated, both as an opportunity to have bran bypass the main ethanol production process and enter the distillers dried grain with solubles (DDGS) co-product in a dry state, or as a means of obtaining bran for AX extraction. Process flowsheets describing three scenarios were created using SuperPro Designer: conventional wheat-to-bioethanol production with DDGS as the principal co-product; bioethanol production with co-production of AX using conventional hammer milling and sieving to recover the bran for AX extraction; and the use of pearling technology to recover bran for AX extraction. Full economic analysis of each of the three scenarios, considering all capital and operating costs, was undertaken, basing comparisons on a constant return on investment in order to estimate the production costs of AX. Sending bran removed via pearling directly to DDGS was not economic; the reduced ethanol yield and increased electricity costs more than offset the savings in drying costs. Simulation of the integrated processes indicated that an AX product of 80% purity could be co-produced with ethanol at a cost of around 3.7-4.5£/kg. This is within the range of comparable viscosity-enhancing ingredients used in the food industry, but is towards the top end of the range. In order to establish a market, AX would therefore need to offer some additional functionality. AX production from bran obtained via pearling was more expensive that from bran obtained via hammer milling and sieving; however, whether the functionality of the AX differs needs to be established. The research indicates that creating a market for AX is feasible in terms of production costs if the AX is co-produced with ethanol. On this basis, further research is justified to investigate the functionality of AX from different sources, to optimise the AX extraction process and to establish the potential of AX as a food or pharmaceutical ingredient.

AB - This study investigated the economic feasibility of co-producing an arabinoxylan (AX) product with ethanol from wheat, in order to establish whether, under plausible scenarios, it was realistic that a commercial source of wheat AX could be established. The possibility of recovering wheat bran via pearling was also investigated, both as an opportunity to have bran bypass the main ethanol production process and enter the distillers dried grain with solubles (DDGS) co-product in a dry state, or as a means of obtaining bran for AX extraction. Process flowsheets describing three scenarios were created using SuperPro Designer: conventional wheat-to-bioethanol production with DDGS as the principal co-product; bioethanol production with co-production of AX using conventional hammer milling and sieving to recover the bran for AX extraction; and the use of pearling technology to recover bran for AX extraction. Full economic analysis of each of the three scenarios, considering all capital and operating costs, was undertaken, basing comparisons on a constant return on investment in order to estimate the production costs of AX. Sending bran removed via pearling directly to DDGS was not economic; the reduced ethanol yield and increased electricity costs more than offset the savings in drying costs. Simulation of the integrated processes indicated that an AX product of 80% purity could be co-produced with ethanol at a cost of around 3.7-4.5£/kg. This is within the range of comparable viscosity-enhancing ingredients used in the food industry, but is towards the top end of the range. In order to establish a market, AX would therefore need to offer some additional functionality. AX production from bran obtained via pearling was more expensive that from bran obtained via hammer milling and sieving; however, whether the functionality of the AX differs needs to be established. The research indicates that creating a market for AX is feasible in terms of production costs if the AX is co-produced with ethanol. On this basis, further research is justified to investigate the functionality of AX from different sources, to optimise the AX extraction process and to establish the potential of AX as a food or pharmaceutical ingredient.

KW - Arabinoxylan

KW - Bioethanol

KW - Economic analysis

KW - Process integration

KW - Process simulation

KW - Wheat biorefinery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69949144281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/chemical-engineering-research-and-design

U2 - 10.1016/j.cherd.2008.12.028

DO - 10.1016/j.cherd.2008.12.028

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 1239

EP - 1250

JO - Chemical Engineering Research and Design

T2 - Chemical Engineering Research and Design

JF - Chemical Engineering Research and Design

SN - 0263-8762

IS - 9

ER -