Evaluation of Corporate Sustainability

Panitas Sureeyatanapas, Jian Bo Yang, David Bamford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As a consequence of an increasing demand in sustainable development for business organizations, the evaluation of corporate sustainability has become a topic intensively focused by academic researchers and business practitioners. Several techniques in the context of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) have been suggested to facilitate the evaluation and the analysis of sustainability performance. However, due to the complexity of evaluation, such as a compilation of quantitative and qualitative measures, interrelationships among various sustainability criteria, the assessor’s hesitation in scoring, or incomplete information, simple techniques may not be able to generate reliable results which can reflect the overall sustainability performance of a company. This paper proposes a series of mathematical formulations based upon the evidential reasoning (ER) approach which can be used to aggregate results from qualitative judgments with quantitative measurements under various types of complex and uncertain situations. The evaluation of corporate sustainability through the ER model is demonstrated using actual data generated from three sugar manufacturing companies in Thailand. The proposed model facilitates managers in analysing the performance and identifying improvement plans and goals. It also simplifies decision making related to sustainable development initiatives. The model can be generalized to a wider area of performance assessment, as well as to any cases of multiple criteria analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-194
Number of pages19
JournalFrontiers of Engineering Management
Volume1
Issue number2
Early online date5 Sep 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sep 2014

Fingerprint

Corporate sustainability
Evaluation
Sustainability
Evidential reasoning
Sustainable development
Manufacturing companies
Interrelationship
Incomplete information
Multiple criteria analysis
Thailand
Multiple criteria decision analysis
Performance assessment
Business organization
Decision making
Scoring
Managers

Cite this

Sureeyatanapas, P., Yang, J. B., & Bamford, D. (2014). Evaluation of Corporate Sustainability. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 1(2), 176-194. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2014025
Sureeyatanapas, Panitas ; Yang, Jian Bo ; Bamford, David. / Evaluation of Corporate Sustainability. In: Frontiers of Engineering Management. 2014 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 176-194.
@article{c0e0b22aebb54c4eb9aba9d8d24d1895,
title = "Evaluation of Corporate Sustainability",
abstract = "As a consequence of an increasing demand in sustainable development for business organizations, the evaluation of corporate sustainability has become a topic intensively focused by academic researchers and business practitioners. Several techniques in the context of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) have been suggested to facilitate the evaluation and the analysis of sustainability performance. However, due to the complexity of evaluation, such as a compilation of quantitative and qualitative measures, interrelationships among various sustainability criteria, the assessor’s hesitation in scoring, or incomplete information, simple techniques may not be able to generate reliable results which can reflect the overall sustainability performance of a company. This paper proposes a series of mathematical formulations based upon the evidential reasoning (ER) approach which can be used to aggregate results from qualitative judgments with quantitative measurements under various types of complex and uncertain situations. The evaluation of corporate sustainability through the ER model is demonstrated using actual data generated from three sugar manufacturing companies in Thailand. The proposed model facilitates managers in analysing the performance and identifying improvement plans and goals. It also simplifies decision making related to sustainable development initiatives. The model can be generalized to a wider area of performance assessment, as well as to any cases of multiple criteria analysis.",
keywords = "corporate, organization, sustainability, evidential reasoning, evaluation, assessment",
author = "Panitas Sureeyatanapas and Yang, {Jian Bo} and David Bamford",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "16",
doi = "10.15302/J-FEM-2014025",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "176--194",
journal = "Frontiers of Engineering Management",
issn = "2095-7513",
number = "2",

}

Sureeyatanapas, P, Yang, JB & Bamford, D 2014, 'Evaluation of Corporate Sustainability', Frontiers of Engineering Management, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 176-194. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2014025

Evaluation of Corporate Sustainability. / Sureeyatanapas, Panitas; Yang, Jian Bo; Bamford, David.

In: Frontiers of Engineering Management, Vol. 1, No. 2, 16.09.2014, p. 176-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of Corporate Sustainability

AU - Sureeyatanapas, Panitas

AU - Yang, Jian Bo

AU - Bamford, David

PY - 2014/9/16

Y1 - 2014/9/16

N2 - As a consequence of an increasing demand in sustainable development for business organizations, the evaluation of corporate sustainability has become a topic intensively focused by academic researchers and business practitioners. Several techniques in the context of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) have been suggested to facilitate the evaluation and the analysis of sustainability performance. However, due to the complexity of evaluation, such as a compilation of quantitative and qualitative measures, interrelationships among various sustainability criteria, the assessor’s hesitation in scoring, or incomplete information, simple techniques may not be able to generate reliable results which can reflect the overall sustainability performance of a company. This paper proposes a series of mathematical formulations based upon the evidential reasoning (ER) approach which can be used to aggregate results from qualitative judgments with quantitative measurements under various types of complex and uncertain situations. The evaluation of corporate sustainability through the ER model is demonstrated using actual data generated from three sugar manufacturing companies in Thailand. The proposed model facilitates managers in analysing the performance and identifying improvement plans and goals. It also simplifies decision making related to sustainable development initiatives. The model can be generalized to a wider area of performance assessment, as well as to any cases of multiple criteria analysis.

AB - As a consequence of an increasing demand in sustainable development for business organizations, the evaluation of corporate sustainability has become a topic intensively focused by academic researchers and business practitioners. Several techniques in the context of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) have been suggested to facilitate the evaluation and the analysis of sustainability performance. However, due to the complexity of evaluation, such as a compilation of quantitative and qualitative measures, interrelationships among various sustainability criteria, the assessor’s hesitation in scoring, or incomplete information, simple techniques may not be able to generate reliable results which can reflect the overall sustainability performance of a company. This paper proposes a series of mathematical formulations based upon the evidential reasoning (ER) approach which can be used to aggregate results from qualitative judgments with quantitative measurements under various types of complex and uncertain situations. The evaluation of corporate sustainability through the ER model is demonstrated using actual data generated from three sugar manufacturing companies in Thailand. The proposed model facilitates managers in analysing the performance and identifying improvement plans and goals. It also simplifies decision making related to sustainable development initiatives. The model can be generalized to a wider area of performance assessment, as well as to any cases of multiple criteria analysis.

KW - corporate

KW - organization

KW - sustainability

KW - evidential reasoning

KW - evaluation

KW - assessment

U2 - 10.15302/J-FEM-2014025

DO - 10.15302/J-FEM-2014025

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 176

EP - 194

JO - Frontiers of Engineering Management

JF - Frontiers of Engineering Management

SN - 2095-7513

IS - 2

ER -