Evaluation of sizing provision among high street retailers and consumer buying practices of children's clothing in the UK

Michelle Ann Tongue, Rose Otieno, Tracy Cassidy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose– Since anthropometric dimensions vary during a lifetime, it is difficult to provide adequate sizing for all, especially growing, children. This paper aims to review children's sizing provision for girls aged 4‐8 years among four UK retailers (Adams, Debenhams, Marks & Spencer and Mothercare), an area of limited research.
Design/methodology/approach– Two research strategies were utilised: observational visits to retail stores (on sizing systems and environment) and face‐to‐face interviews with ten parents and five childrenswear garment technologists (on sizing of children's garments and fit issues).
Findings– UK retailers utilised various numerical size coding systems based on height, age and weight. Next, Asda George and Adams were the favourite shopping stores for children's wear. Parents were co‐shoppers with their children. While parents' key criteria for purchase were durability, fit, quality, price and washability, children's choice was based on colour, fashion and peer influence. Variation in sizing designation caused confusion. Parents have suggested varying lengths as a solution to accommodating different sizes; preferring a common system with age as key size code. Sizing inconsistency between brands and incomprehensible size codes are major factors in the creation of customer dissatisfaction with children's clothing. Providing ambient facilities for co‐shopping is vital.
Research limitations/implications– The children's fashion sector is important to children, parents and retailers. Parents are co‐shoppers with their children and have key criteria for selecting to shop in a store. Marketers should be aware of core needs: sizing provision, shopping environment and the dynamics of co‐shopping. Sizing systems should be relevant to avoid dissatisfaction and confusion. More research is needed focusing on larger and other samples; target markets and psychological needs for shopping.
Originality/value– The area of children's shopping for clothing in the UK has a limited literature. Key issues revolve around garment sizing, garment fit, co‐shopping and consumer satisfaction. This study contributes to filling the gap in knowledge.
LanguageEnglish
Pages429-450
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Fashion Marketing and Management
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jul 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sizing
Evaluation
Retailers
Shopping
Childrenswear
Design methodology
Durability
Inconsistency
Purchase
Research strategy
Marketers
Peer influence
Dissatisfaction
Psychological
Factors
Target markets
Consumer satisfaction
Retail stores
Anthropometrics
Customer dissatisfaction

Cite this

@article{855b316f7bd2420e8f6e311fa934c73c,
title = "Evaluation of sizing provision among high street retailers and consumer buying practices of children's clothing in the UK",
abstract = "Purpose– Since anthropometric dimensions vary during a lifetime, it is difficult to provide adequate sizing for all, especially growing, children. This paper aims to review children's sizing provision for girls aged 4‐8 years among four UK retailers (Adams, Debenhams, Marks & Spencer and Mothercare), an area of limited research.Design/methodology/approach– Two research strategies were utilised: observational visits to retail stores (on sizing systems and environment) and face‐to‐face interviews with ten parents and five childrenswear garment technologists (on sizing of children's garments and fit issues).Findings– UK retailers utilised various numerical size coding systems based on height, age and weight. Next, Asda George and Adams were the favourite shopping stores for children's wear. Parents were co‐shoppers with their children. While parents' key criteria for purchase were durability, fit, quality, price and washability, children's choice was based on colour, fashion and peer influence. Variation in sizing designation caused confusion. Parents have suggested varying lengths as a solution to accommodating different sizes; preferring a common system with age as key size code. Sizing inconsistency between brands and incomprehensible size codes are major factors in the creation of customer dissatisfaction with children's clothing. Providing ambient facilities for co‐shopping is vital.Research limitations/implications– The children's fashion sector is important to children, parents and retailers. Parents are co‐shoppers with their children and have key criteria for selecting to shop in a store. Marketers should be aware of core needs: sizing provision, shopping environment and the dynamics of co‐shopping. Sizing systems should be relevant to avoid dissatisfaction and confusion. More research is needed focusing on larger and other samples; target markets and psychological needs for shopping.Originality/value– The area of children's shopping for clothing in the UK has a limited literature. Key issues revolve around garment sizing, garment fit, co‐shopping and consumer satisfaction. This study contributes to filling the gap in knowledge.",
keywords = "children (age groups), buying behaviour",
author = "Tongue, {Michelle Ann} and Rose Otieno and Tracy Cassidy",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1108/13612021011061870",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "429--450",
journal = "Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management",
issn = "1361-2026",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Evaluation of sizing provision among high street retailers and consumer buying practices of children's clothing in the UK. / Tongue, Michelle Ann; Otieno, Rose; Cassidy, Tracy.

In: Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol. 14, No. 3, 13.07.2010, p. 429-450.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of sizing provision among high street retailers and consumer buying practices of children's clothing in the UK

AU - Tongue, Michelle Ann

AU - Otieno, Rose

AU - Cassidy, Tracy

PY - 2010/7/13

Y1 - 2010/7/13

N2 - Purpose– Since anthropometric dimensions vary during a lifetime, it is difficult to provide adequate sizing for all, especially growing, children. This paper aims to review children's sizing provision for girls aged 4‐8 years among four UK retailers (Adams, Debenhams, Marks & Spencer and Mothercare), an area of limited research.Design/methodology/approach– Two research strategies were utilised: observational visits to retail stores (on sizing systems and environment) and face‐to‐face interviews with ten parents and five childrenswear garment technologists (on sizing of children's garments and fit issues).Findings– UK retailers utilised various numerical size coding systems based on height, age and weight. Next, Asda George and Adams were the favourite shopping stores for children's wear. Parents were co‐shoppers with their children. While parents' key criteria for purchase were durability, fit, quality, price and washability, children's choice was based on colour, fashion and peer influence. Variation in sizing designation caused confusion. Parents have suggested varying lengths as a solution to accommodating different sizes; preferring a common system with age as key size code. Sizing inconsistency between brands and incomprehensible size codes are major factors in the creation of customer dissatisfaction with children's clothing. Providing ambient facilities for co‐shopping is vital.Research limitations/implications– The children's fashion sector is important to children, parents and retailers. Parents are co‐shoppers with their children and have key criteria for selecting to shop in a store. Marketers should be aware of core needs: sizing provision, shopping environment and the dynamics of co‐shopping. Sizing systems should be relevant to avoid dissatisfaction and confusion. More research is needed focusing on larger and other samples; target markets and psychological needs for shopping.Originality/value– The area of children's shopping for clothing in the UK has a limited literature. Key issues revolve around garment sizing, garment fit, co‐shopping and consumer satisfaction. This study contributes to filling the gap in knowledge.

AB - Purpose– Since anthropometric dimensions vary during a lifetime, it is difficult to provide adequate sizing for all, especially growing, children. This paper aims to review children's sizing provision for girls aged 4‐8 years among four UK retailers (Adams, Debenhams, Marks & Spencer and Mothercare), an area of limited research.Design/methodology/approach– Two research strategies were utilised: observational visits to retail stores (on sizing systems and environment) and face‐to‐face interviews with ten parents and five childrenswear garment technologists (on sizing of children's garments and fit issues).Findings– UK retailers utilised various numerical size coding systems based on height, age and weight. Next, Asda George and Adams were the favourite shopping stores for children's wear. Parents were co‐shoppers with their children. While parents' key criteria for purchase were durability, fit, quality, price and washability, children's choice was based on colour, fashion and peer influence. Variation in sizing designation caused confusion. Parents have suggested varying lengths as a solution to accommodating different sizes; preferring a common system with age as key size code. Sizing inconsistency between brands and incomprehensible size codes are major factors in the creation of customer dissatisfaction with children's clothing. Providing ambient facilities for co‐shopping is vital.Research limitations/implications– The children's fashion sector is important to children, parents and retailers. Parents are co‐shoppers with their children and have key criteria for selecting to shop in a store. Marketers should be aware of core needs: sizing provision, shopping environment and the dynamics of co‐shopping. Sizing systems should be relevant to avoid dissatisfaction and confusion. More research is needed focusing on larger and other samples; target markets and psychological needs for shopping.Originality/value– The area of children's shopping for clothing in the UK has a limited literature. Key issues revolve around garment sizing, garment fit, co‐shopping and consumer satisfaction. This study contributes to filling the gap in knowledge.

KW - children (age groups)

KW - buying behaviour

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/jfmm

U2 - 10.1108/13612021011061870

DO - 10.1108/13612021011061870

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 429

EP - 450

JO - Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management

T2 - Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management

JF - Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management

SN - 1361-2026

IS - 3

ER -