Evaluation of stem-loop reverse transcription and poly-A tail extension in microRNA analysis of body fluids

Hannah Dunnett, Dieudonne van der Meer, Graham A. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

MicroRNA has been demonstrated to be a viable tool for body fluid identification purposes in forensic casework. Stem-loop reverse transcription (slRT) is regularly used for cDNA synthesis from mature miRNA, along with poly-A tail extension. Both have been used in a forensic context, but no direct comparison has been carried out. It has also not been shown whether poly-A tail extension can be used upon DNA extracts, as previously shown with slRT. Blood and saliva samples were collected and underwent DNA extraction with or without on-column DNA digestion. All samples were then aliquoted and underwent slRT and poly-A tail extension separately. qPCR was then conducted targeting microRNA markers hsa-miR-451 and hsa-miR-205. It was shown that the DNA digestion step did not affect the ability to differentiate between blood and saliva. It was also shown that this differentiation was possible using poly-A tail extension, and that poly-A tail extension exhibited more amplification than slRT. So whilst the choice of slRT and poly-A tail extension for the purpose of forensic body fluid identification is not critical, it may be best to use poly-A tail extension, particularly where there are low traces of sample.

LanguageEnglish
Pages150-154
Number of pages5
JournalMicroRNA (Shāriqah, United Arab Emirates)
Volume3
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Body Fluids
MicroRNAs
Reverse Transcription
Messenger RNA
DNA
Saliva
Digestion
Complementary DNA

Cite this

Dunnett, Hannah ; van der Meer, Dieudonne ; Williams, Graham A. / Evaluation of stem-loop reverse transcription and poly-A tail extension in microRNA analysis of body fluids. In: MicroRNA (Shāriqah, United Arab Emirates). 2014 ; Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 150-154.
@article{2853b98fae5f473894f56c3bf14e8b0e,
title = "Evaluation of stem-loop reverse transcription and poly-A tail extension in microRNA analysis of body fluids",
abstract = "MicroRNA has been demonstrated to be a viable tool for body fluid identification purposes in forensic casework. Stem-loop reverse transcription (slRT) is regularly used for cDNA synthesis from mature miRNA, along with poly-A tail extension. Both have been used in a forensic context, but no direct comparison has been carried out. It has also not been shown whether poly-A tail extension can be used upon DNA extracts, as previously shown with slRT. Blood and saliva samples were collected and underwent DNA extraction with or without on-column DNA digestion. All samples were then aliquoted and underwent slRT and poly-A tail extension separately. qPCR was then conducted targeting microRNA markers hsa-miR-451 and hsa-miR-205. It was shown that the DNA digestion step did not affect the ability to differentiate between blood and saliva. It was also shown that this differentiation was possible using poly-A tail extension, and that poly-A tail extension exhibited more amplification than slRT. So whilst the choice of slRT and poly-A tail extension for the purpose of forensic body fluid identification is not critical, it may be best to use poly-A tail extension, particularly where there are low traces of sample.",
author = "Hannah Dunnett and {van der Meer}, Dieudonne and Williams, {Graham A.}",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "150--154",
journal = "MicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates)",
issn = "2211-5366",
publisher = "Bentham Science Publishers",
number = "3",

}

Evaluation of stem-loop reverse transcription and poly-A tail extension in microRNA analysis of body fluids. / Dunnett, Hannah; van der Meer, Dieudonne; Williams, Graham A.

In: MicroRNA (Shāriqah, United Arab Emirates), Vol. 3, No. 3, 2014, p. 150-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of stem-loop reverse transcription and poly-A tail extension in microRNA analysis of body fluids

AU - Dunnett, Hannah

AU - van der Meer, Dieudonne

AU - Williams, Graham A.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - MicroRNA has been demonstrated to be a viable tool for body fluid identification purposes in forensic casework. Stem-loop reverse transcription (slRT) is regularly used for cDNA synthesis from mature miRNA, along with poly-A tail extension. Both have been used in a forensic context, but no direct comparison has been carried out. It has also not been shown whether poly-A tail extension can be used upon DNA extracts, as previously shown with slRT. Blood and saliva samples were collected and underwent DNA extraction with or without on-column DNA digestion. All samples were then aliquoted and underwent slRT and poly-A tail extension separately. qPCR was then conducted targeting microRNA markers hsa-miR-451 and hsa-miR-205. It was shown that the DNA digestion step did not affect the ability to differentiate between blood and saliva. It was also shown that this differentiation was possible using poly-A tail extension, and that poly-A tail extension exhibited more amplification than slRT. So whilst the choice of slRT and poly-A tail extension for the purpose of forensic body fluid identification is not critical, it may be best to use poly-A tail extension, particularly where there are low traces of sample.

AB - MicroRNA has been demonstrated to be a viable tool for body fluid identification purposes in forensic casework. Stem-loop reverse transcription (slRT) is regularly used for cDNA synthesis from mature miRNA, along with poly-A tail extension. Both have been used in a forensic context, but no direct comparison has been carried out. It has also not been shown whether poly-A tail extension can be used upon DNA extracts, as previously shown with slRT. Blood and saliva samples were collected and underwent DNA extraction with or without on-column DNA digestion. All samples were then aliquoted and underwent slRT and poly-A tail extension separately. qPCR was then conducted targeting microRNA markers hsa-miR-451 and hsa-miR-205. It was shown that the DNA digestion step did not affect the ability to differentiate between blood and saliva. It was also shown that this differentiation was possible using poly-A tail extension, and that poly-A tail extension exhibited more amplification than slRT. So whilst the choice of slRT and poly-A tail extension for the purpose of forensic body fluid identification is not critical, it may be best to use poly-A tail extension, particularly where there are low traces of sample.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991239260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 150

EP - 154

JO - MicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates)

T2 - MicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates)

JF - MicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates)

SN - 2211-5366

IS - 3

ER -