Evaluation of Strawbale Building: Benefits and Risks

Mark Bigland Pritchard, Adrian Pitts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the range of current information in relation to construction using strawbales in walls of buildings. The material can be shown to have a number of distinct advantages and benefits, which are described, but there are also several potential technological risks that must be addressed. These are structural strength; fire risk; attack by animal pests; and moisture and mould growth. Each of these is each critically reviewed to establish that for the first three of these, sufficient information already exists to indicate that risks can be minimised or avoided. There is however some lack of appropriate information on moisture transfer and condensation risk within bale walls, which necessitated further research. This involved the development of a new hygrothermal model that was subsequently used to demonstrate relatively low risk for mould growth in most situations. Summary findings from this work are included. The paper concludes that strawbale building has relatively few problems that cannot be overcome by good design and suitable construction practices, and that its use should therefore be encouraged in appropriate situations.

LanguageEnglish
Pages372-384
Number of pages13
JournalArchitectural Science Review
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Moisture
Condensation
Fires
Animals

Cite this

Pritchard, Mark Bigland ; Pitts, Adrian. / Evaluation of Strawbale Building : Benefits and Risks. In: Architectural Science Review. 2006 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 372-384.
@article{aa0626583783475e93d7beda586a8b83,
title = "Evaluation of Strawbale Building: Benefits and Risks",
abstract = "This paper evaluates the range of current information in relation to construction using strawbales in walls of buildings. The material can be shown to have a number of distinct advantages and benefits, which are described, but there are also several potential technological risks that must be addressed. These are structural strength; fire risk; attack by animal pests; and moisture and mould growth. Each of these is each critically reviewed to establish that for the first three of these, sufficient information already exists to indicate that risks can be minimised or avoided. There is however some lack of appropriate information on moisture transfer and condensation risk within bale walls, which necessitated further research. This involved the development of a new hygrothermal model that was subsequently used to demonstrate relatively low risk for mould growth in most situations. Summary findings from this work are included. The paper concludes that strawbale building has relatively few problems that cannot be overcome by good design and suitable construction practices, and that its use should therefore be encouraged in appropriate situations.",
keywords = "Construction, Ecological impacts, Fire safety, Moisture, Mould growth, Risks, Strawbale building",
author = "Pritchard, {Mark Bigland} and Adrian Pitts",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.3763/asre.2006.4949",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "372--384",
journal = "Architectural Science Review",
issn = "0003-8628",
publisher = "Earthscan",
number = "4",

}

Evaluation of Strawbale Building : Benefits and Risks. / Pritchard, Mark Bigland; Pitts, Adrian.

In: Architectural Science Review, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2006, p. 372-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of Strawbale Building

T2 - Architectural Science Review

AU - Pritchard, Mark Bigland

AU - Pitts, Adrian

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This paper evaluates the range of current information in relation to construction using strawbales in walls of buildings. The material can be shown to have a number of distinct advantages and benefits, which are described, but there are also several potential technological risks that must be addressed. These are structural strength; fire risk; attack by animal pests; and moisture and mould growth. Each of these is each critically reviewed to establish that for the first three of these, sufficient information already exists to indicate that risks can be minimised or avoided. There is however some lack of appropriate information on moisture transfer and condensation risk within bale walls, which necessitated further research. This involved the development of a new hygrothermal model that was subsequently used to demonstrate relatively low risk for mould growth in most situations. Summary findings from this work are included. The paper concludes that strawbale building has relatively few problems that cannot be overcome by good design and suitable construction practices, and that its use should therefore be encouraged in appropriate situations.

AB - This paper evaluates the range of current information in relation to construction using strawbales in walls of buildings. The material can be shown to have a number of distinct advantages and benefits, which are described, but there are also several potential technological risks that must be addressed. These are structural strength; fire risk; attack by animal pests; and moisture and mould growth. Each of these is each critically reviewed to establish that for the first three of these, sufficient information already exists to indicate that risks can be minimised or avoided. There is however some lack of appropriate information on moisture transfer and condensation risk within bale walls, which necessitated further research. This involved the development of a new hygrothermal model that was subsequently used to demonstrate relatively low risk for mould growth in most situations. Summary findings from this work are included. The paper concludes that strawbale building has relatively few problems that cannot be overcome by good design and suitable construction practices, and that its use should therefore be encouraged in appropriate situations.

KW - Construction

KW - Ecological impacts

KW - Fire safety

KW - Moisture

KW - Mould growth

KW - Risks

KW - Strawbale building

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845435008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3763/asre.2006.4949

DO - 10.3763/asre.2006.4949

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 372

EP - 384

JO - Architectural Science Review

JF - Architectural Science Review

SN - 0003-8628

IS - 4

ER -