Evidence evaluation for discrete data

Colin Aitken; Erica Gold

doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.042

Evidence evaluation for discrete data

Colin Aitken, Erica Gold

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Methods for the evaluation of evidence in the form of measurements by means of the likelihood ratio are becoming more widespread. There is a paucity of methods for the evaluation of evidence in the form of counts by means of the likelihood ratio. Two suggestions for such methods are described. Examples of their performance are illustrated in the context of a problem in forensic phonetics. There is discussion of the problems particular to the evaluation of evidence for discrete data, with suggestions for further work.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	147-155
Number of pages	9
Journal	Forensic Science International
Volume	230
Issue number	1-3
Early online date	20 Mar 2013
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.042
Publication status	Published - 10 Jul 2013
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.042Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{a02a130140554f2b80025f091aa590f7,

title = "Evidence evaluation for discrete data",

abstract = "Methods for the evaluation of evidence in the form of measurements by means of the likelihood ratio are becoming more widespread. There is a paucity of methods for the evaluation of evidence in the form of counts by means of the likelihood ratio. Two suggestions for such methods are described. Examples of their performance are illustrated in the context of a problem in forensic phonetics. There is discussion of the problems particular to the evaluation of evidence for discrete data, with suggestions for further work.",

keywords = "Discrete data, Evidence evaluation, Forensic phonetics, Likelihood ratio",

author = "Colin Aitken and Erica Gold",

year = "2013",

month = jul,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.042",

language = "English",

volume = "230",

pages = "147--155",

journal = "Forensic Science International",

issn = "0379-0738",

publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence evaluation for discrete data

AU - Aitken, Colin

AU - Gold, Erica

PY - 2013/7/10

Y1 - 2013/7/10

N2 - Methods for the evaluation of evidence in the form of measurements by means of the likelihood ratio are becoming more widespread. There is a paucity of methods for the evaluation of evidence in the form of counts by means of the likelihood ratio. Two suggestions for such methods are described. Examples of their performance are illustrated in the context of a problem in forensic phonetics. There is discussion of the problems particular to the evaluation of evidence for discrete data, with suggestions for further work.

AB - Methods for the evaluation of evidence in the form of measurements by means of the likelihood ratio are becoming more widespread. There is a paucity of methods for the evaluation of evidence in the form of counts by means of the likelihood ratio. Two suggestions for such methods are described. Examples of their performance are illustrated in the context of a problem in forensic phonetics. There is discussion of the problems particular to the evaluation of evidence for discrete data, with suggestions for further work.

KW - Discrete data

KW - Evidence evaluation

KW - Forensic phonetics

KW - Likelihood ratio

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879604635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.journals.elsevier.com/forensic-science-international

U2 - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.042

DO - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.042

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84879604635

VL - 230

SP - 147

EP - 155

JO - Forensic Science International

JF - Forensic Science International

SN - 0379-0738

IS - 1-3

ER -

Evidence evaluation for discrete data

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this