Experiences of Asylum Seeking Women and Their Children in United Kingdom Detention Facilities: A Matter for Rights Enforcement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the detention of asylum seeking women and their children and demonstrates that this practice breaches human rights obligations and undermines the UK’s policies on gender sensitivity and children’s welfare. Case study research was carried out with a small cohort of women with children who had experienced detention during their claim for asylum. Data were analysed thematically. The detention of women and their children who seek asylum is detrimental to mental and physical health and has long term implications for individuals and families. Detention was arbitrary and there was no evidence of the application of gender-sensitive guidelines. Principles of gender-sensitivity are important but when subsumed by politically expedient processes can seem little more than a cosmetic gesture towards women’s and children’s rights. The authors argue that immigration policy itself should be subject to impact assessments for its implications for women and children.
LanguageEnglish
JournalScientific Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iaşi. New Series. Sociology and Social Work Section
Volume5
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

experience
gender
cosmetics
children's rights
immigration policy
child welfare
obligation
human rights
health
evidence

Cite this

@article{de61229854ee4edda49666c498f87938,
title = "Experiences of Asylum Seeking Women and Their Children in United Kingdom Detention Facilities: A Matter for Rights Enforcement",
abstract = "This article examines the detention of asylum seeking women and their children and demonstrates that this practice breaches human rights obligations and undermines the UK’s policies on gender sensitivity and children’s welfare. Case study research was carried out with a small cohort of women with children who had experienced detention during their claim for asylum. Data were analysed thematically. The detention of women and their children who seek asylum is detrimental to mental and physical health and has long term implications for individuals and families. Detention was arbitrary and there was no evidence of the application of gender-sensitive guidelines. Principles of gender-sensitivity are important but when subsumed by politically expedient processes can seem little more than a cosmetic gesture towards women’s and children’s rights. The authors argue that immigration policy itself should be subject to impact assessments for its implications for women and children.",
keywords = "asylum, children, detention, gender sensitivity, United Kingdom, women",
author = "Kate Smith and Adele Jones",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Scientific Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iaşi. New Series. Sociology and Social Work Section",
issn = "2066-8961",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experiences of Asylum Seeking Women and Their Children in United Kingdom Detention Facilities

T2 - Scientific Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iaşi. New Series. Sociology and Social Work Section

AU - Smith, Kate

AU - Jones, Adele

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This article examines the detention of asylum seeking women and their children and demonstrates that this practice breaches human rights obligations and undermines the UK’s policies on gender sensitivity and children’s welfare. Case study research was carried out with a small cohort of women with children who had experienced detention during their claim for asylum. Data were analysed thematically. The detention of women and their children who seek asylum is detrimental to mental and physical health and has long term implications for individuals and families. Detention was arbitrary and there was no evidence of the application of gender-sensitive guidelines. Principles of gender-sensitivity are important but when subsumed by politically expedient processes can seem little more than a cosmetic gesture towards women’s and children’s rights. The authors argue that immigration policy itself should be subject to impact assessments for its implications for women and children.

AB - This article examines the detention of asylum seeking women and their children and demonstrates that this practice breaches human rights obligations and undermines the UK’s policies on gender sensitivity and children’s welfare. Case study research was carried out with a small cohort of women with children who had experienced detention during their claim for asylum. Data were analysed thematically. The detention of women and their children who seek asylum is detrimental to mental and physical health and has long term implications for individuals and families. Detention was arbitrary and there was no evidence of the application of gender-sensitive guidelines. Principles of gender-sensitivity are important but when subsumed by politically expedient processes can seem little more than a cosmetic gesture towards women’s and children’s rights. The authors argue that immigration policy itself should be subject to impact assessments for its implications for women and children.

KW - asylum

KW - children

KW - detention

KW - gender sensitivity

KW - United Kingdom

KW - women

UR - http://pr.uaic.ro/index.php/asas/article/view/82

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Scientific Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iaşi. New Series. Sociology and Social Work Section

JF - Scientific Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iaşi. New Series. Sociology and Social Work Section

SN - 2066-8961

IS - 2

ER -