Explicating concepts in reasoning from function to form by two-step innovative abductions

Ehud Kroll, Lauri Koskela

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The mechanism of design reasoning from function to form is suggested to consist of a two-step inference of the innovative abduction type. First is an inference from a desired functional aspect to an idea, concept, or solution principle to satisfy the function. This is followed by a second innovative abduction, from the latest concept to form, structure, or mechanism. The intermediate entity in the logical reasoning, the concept, is thus made explicit, which is significant in following and understanding a specific design process, for educating designers, and to build a logic-based computational model of design. The idea of a two-step abductive reasoning process is developed from the critical examination of several propositions made by others. We use the notion of innovative abduction in design, as opposed to such abduction where the question is about selecting among known alternatives, and we adopt a previously proposed two-step process of abductive reasoning. However, our model is different in that the two abductions used follow the syllogistic pattern of innovative abduction. In addition to using a schematic example from the literature to demonstrate our derivation, we apply the model to an existing, empirically derived method of conceptual design called "parameter analysis" and use two examples of real design processes. The two synthetic steps of the method are shown to follow the proposed double innovative abduction scheme, and the design processes are presented as sequences of double abductions from function to concept and from concept to form, with a subsequent deductive evaluation step.

LanguageEnglish
Pages125-137
Number of pages13
JournalArtificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM
Volume30
Issue number2
Early online date18 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2016

Fingerprint

Schematic diagrams
Conceptual design

Cite this

@article{a9ce9e63253f445cb5e353c9672a11e4,
title = "Explicating concepts in reasoning from function to form by two-step innovative abductions",
abstract = "The mechanism of design reasoning from function to form is suggested to consist of a two-step inference of the innovative abduction type. First is an inference from a desired functional aspect to an idea, concept, or solution principle to satisfy the function. This is followed by a second innovative abduction, from the latest concept to form, structure, or mechanism. The intermediate entity in the logical reasoning, the concept, is thus made explicit, which is significant in following and understanding a specific design process, for educating designers, and to build a logic-based computational model of design. The idea of a two-step abductive reasoning process is developed from the critical examination of several propositions made by others. We use the notion of innovative abduction in design, as opposed to such abduction where the question is about selecting among known alternatives, and we adopt a previously proposed two-step process of abductive reasoning. However, our model is different in that the two abductions used follow the syllogistic pattern of innovative abduction. In addition to using a schematic example from the literature to demonstrate our derivation, we apply the model to an existing, empirically derived method of conceptual design called {"}parameter analysis{"} and use two examples of real design processes. The two synthetic steps of the method are shown to follow the proposed double innovative abduction scheme, and the design processes are presented as sequences of double abductions from function to concept and from concept to form, with a subsequent deductive evaluation step.",
keywords = "Abduction, Design Reasoning, Innovative Abduction, Parameter Analysis",
author = "Ehud Kroll and Lauri Koskela",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1017/S0890060416000020",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "125--137",
journal = "Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM",
issn = "0890-0604",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explicating concepts in reasoning from function to form by two-step innovative abductions

AU - Kroll, Ehud

AU - Koskela, Lauri

PY - 2016/5

Y1 - 2016/5

N2 - The mechanism of design reasoning from function to form is suggested to consist of a two-step inference of the innovative abduction type. First is an inference from a desired functional aspect to an idea, concept, or solution principle to satisfy the function. This is followed by a second innovative abduction, from the latest concept to form, structure, or mechanism. The intermediate entity in the logical reasoning, the concept, is thus made explicit, which is significant in following and understanding a specific design process, for educating designers, and to build a logic-based computational model of design. The idea of a two-step abductive reasoning process is developed from the critical examination of several propositions made by others. We use the notion of innovative abduction in design, as opposed to such abduction where the question is about selecting among known alternatives, and we adopt a previously proposed two-step process of abductive reasoning. However, our model is different in that the two abductions used follow the syllogistic pattern of innovative abduction. In addition to using a schematic example from the literature to demonstrate our derivation, we apply the model to an existing, empirically derived method of conceptual design called "parameter analysis" and use two examples of real design processes. The two synthetic steps of the method are shown to follow the proposed double innovative abduction scheme, and the design processes are presented as sequences of double abductions from function to concept and from concept to form, with a subsequent deductive evaluation step.

AB - The mechanism of design reasoning from function to form is suggested to consist of a two-step inference of the innovative abduction type. First is an inference from a desired functional aspect to an idea, concept, or solution principle to satisfy the function. This is followed by a second innovative abduction, from the latest concept to form, structure, or mechanism. The intermediate entity in the logical reasoning, the concept, is thus made explicit, which is significant in following and understanding a specific design process, for educating designers, and to build a logic-based computational model of design. The idea of a two-step abductive reasoning process is developed from the critical examination of several propositions made by others. We use the notion of innovative abduction in design, as opposed to such abduction where the question is about selecting among known alternatives, and we adopt a previously proposed two-step process of abductive reasoning. However, our model is different in that the two abductions used follow the syllogistic pattern of innovative abduction. In addition to using a schematic example from the literature to demonstrate our derivation, we apply the model to an existing, empirically derived method of conceptual design called "parameter analysis" and use two examples of real design processes. The two synthetic steps of the method are shown to follow the proposed double innovative abduction scheme, and the design processes are presented as sequences of double abductions from function to concept and from concept to form, with a subsequent deductive evaluation step.

KW - Abduction

KW - Design Reasoning

KW - Innovative Abduction

KW - Parameter Analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964329720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0890060416000020

DO - 10.1017/S0890060416000020

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 125

EP - 137

JO - Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

T2 - Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

JF - Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

SN - 0890-0604

IS - 2

ER -