Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services

Explaining the 'inverse intervention law'

Paul Bywaters, Geraldine Brady, Tim Sparks, Elizabeth Bos, Lisa Bunting, Brigid Daniel, Brid Featherstone, Kate Morris, Jonathan Scourfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Attempts to record, understand and respond to variations in child welfare and protection reporting, service patterns and outcomes are international, numerous and longstanding. Reframing such variations as an issue of inequity between children and between families opens the way to a new approach to explaining the profound difference in intervention rates between and within countries and administrative districts. Recent accounts of variation have frequently been based on the idea that there is a binary division between bias and risk (or need). Here we propose seeing supply (bias) and demand (risk) factors as two aspects of a single system, both framed, in part, by social structures. A recent finding from a study of intervention rates in England, the 'inverse intervention law', is used to illustrate the complex ways in which a range of factors interact to produce intervention rates. In turn, this analysis raises profound moral, policy, practice and research questions about current child welfare and child protection services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-105
Number of pages8
JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
Volume57
Early online date31 Jul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

child protection
Child Welfare
child welfare
Law
Ethics
England
administrative district
trend
Research
social structure
supply
demand

Cite this

Bywaters, Paul ; Brady, Geraldine ; Sparks, Tim ; Bos, Elizabeth ; Bunting, Lisa ; Daniel, Brigid ; Featherstone, Brid ; Morris, Kate ; Scourfield, Jonathan. / Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services : Explaining the 'inverse intervention law'. In: Children and Youth Services Review. 2015 ; Vol. 57. pp. 98-105.
@article{8dc7ac06ad5645cd84777b81db422ce1,
title = "Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services: Explaining the 'inverse intervention law'",
abstract = "Attempts to record, understand and respond to variations in child welfare and protection reporting, service patterns and outcomes are international, numerous and longstanding. Reframing such variations as an issue of inequity between children and between families opens the way to a new approach to explaining the profound difference in intervention rates between and within countries and administrative districts. Recent accounts of variation have frequently been based on the idea that there is a binary division between bias and risk (or need). Here we propose seeing supply (bias) and demand (risk) factors as two aspects of a single system, both framed, in part, by social structures. A recent finding from a study of intervention rates in England, the 'inverse intervention law', is used to illustrate the complex ways in which a range of factors interact to produce intervention rates. In turn, this analysis raises profound moral, policy, practice and research questions about current child welfare and child protection services.",
keywords = "Child protection, Child welfare, Social inequity, Social policy",
author = "Paul Bywaters and Geraldine Brady and Tim Sparks and Elizabeth Bos and Lisa Bunting and Brigid Daniel and Brid Featherstone and Kate Morris and Jonathan Scourfield",
note = "No full text in Eprints. HN 15/11/2017",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.017",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "98--105",
journal = "Children and Youth Services Review",
issn = "0190-7409",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services : Explaining the 'inverse intervention law'. / Bywaters, Paul; Brady, Geraldine; Sparks, Tim; Bos, Elizabeth; Bunting, Lisa; Daniel, Brigid; Featherstone, Brid; Morris, Kate; Scourfield, Jonathan.

In: Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 57, 10.2015, p. 98-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services

T2 - Explaining the 'inverse intervention law'

AU - Bywaters, Paul

AU - Brady, Geraldine

AU - Sparks, Tim

AU - Bos, Elizabeth

AU - Bunting, Lisa

AU - Daniel, Brigid

AU - Featherstone, Brid

AU - Morris, Kate

AU - Scourfield, Jonathan

N1 - No full text in Eprints. HN 15/11/2017

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - Attempts to record, understand and respond to variations in child welfare and protection reporting, service patterns and outcomes are international, numerous and longstanding. Reframing such variations as an issue of inequity between children and between families opens the way to a new approach to explaining the profound difference in intervention rates between and within countries and administrative districts. Recent accounts of variation have frequently been based on the idea that there is a binary division between bias and risk (or need). Here we propose seeing supply (bias) and demand (risk) factors as two aspects of a single system, both framed, in part, by social structures. A recent finding from a study of intervention rates in England, the 'inverse intervention law', is used to illustrate the complex ways in which a range of factors interact to produce intervention rates. In turn, this analysis raises profound moral, policy, practice and research questions about current child welfare and child protection services.

AB - Attempts to record, understand and respond to variations in child welfare and protection reporting, service patterns and outcomes are international, numerous and longstanding. Reframing such variations as an issue of inequity between children and between families opens the way to a new approach to explaining the profound difference in intervention rates between and within countries and administrative districts. Recent accounts of variation have frequently been based on the idea that there is a binary division between bias and risk (or need). Here we propose seeing supply (bias) and demand (risk) factors as two aspects of a single system, both framed, in part, by social structures. A recent finding from a study of intervention rates in England, the 'inverse intervention law', is used to illustrate the complex ways in which a range of factors interact to produce intervention rates. In turn, this analysis raises profound moral, policy, practice and research questions about current child welfare and child protection services.

KW - Child protection

KW - Child welfare

KW - Social inequity

KW - Social policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939620273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.017

DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.017

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 98

EP - 105

JO - Children and Youth Services Review

JF - Children and Youth Services Review

SN - 0190-7409

ER -