'Face' across historical cultures: A comparative study of Turkish and Chinese

Sükriye Ruhi, Dániel Z. Kádár

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of the word 'face' in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Turkish and Chinese so as to trace the meaning of the concept in the two languages and cultures. The study describes the occurrence of the lexeme in five semantic/pragmatic domains in novels dating from the turn of the twentieth century, a period that corresponds to an acceleration in modernisation movements. Two conclusions are drawn from the comparison of face in Turkish and Chinese, and noteworthy similarities and differences are shown. The interpersonal and the emotional domains cover a wide usage area but form mirror images of each other in terms of the frequency of the tokens. Yet, the Chinese novels reveal more metapragmatic discourse on talk. This is interpreted as face forming a profound emic notion in Chinese culture, which encompasses both relational management and the social worth of the person, while the Turkish novels suggest that it is an "idiom" primarily employed for describing relational management style.

LanguageEnglish
Pages25-48
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Historical Pragmatics
Volume12
Issue number1-2
Early online date7 Jun 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

twentieth century
management style
modernization
pragmatics
semantics
human being
Novel
Comparative Study
Historical Culture
discourse
language
management
Emotion
Idioms
Person
Language
Metapragmatics
Discourse
Management Styles
Chinese Culture

Cite this

Ruhi, Sükriye ; Kádár, Dániel Z. / 'Face' across historical cultures : A comparative study of Turkish and Chinese. In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics. 2011 ; Vol. 12, No. 1-2. pp. 25-48.
@article{6dd2888ca78b41c6bdabb3e1ffc18108,
title = "'Face' across historical cultures: A comparative study of Turkish and Chinese",
abstract = "This paper investigates the use of the word 'face' in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Turkish and Chinese so as to trace the meaning of the concept in the two languages and cultures. The study describes the occurrence of the lexeme in five semantic/pragmatic domains in novels dating from the turn of the twentieth century, a period that corresponds to an acceleration in modernisation movements. Two conclusions are drawn from the comparison of face in Turkish and Chinese, and noteworthy similarities and differences are shown. The interpersonal and the emotional domains cover a wide usage area but form mirror images of each other in terms of the frequency of the tokens. Yet, the Chinese novels reveal more metapragmatic discourse on talk. This is interpreted as face forming a profound emic notion in Chinese culture, which encompasses both relational management and the social worth of the person, while the Turkish novels suggest that it is an {"}idiom{"} primarily employed for describing relational management style.",
keywords = "Emic, Face, Nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Turkish and Chinese novels",
author = "S{\"u}kriye Ruhi and K{\'a}d{\'a}r, {D{\'a}niel Z.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.02ruh",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "25--48",
journal = "Journal of Historical Pragmatics",
issn = "1566-5852",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "1-2",

}

'Face' across historical cultures : A comparative study of Turkish and Chinese. / Ruhi, Sükriye; Kádár, Dániel Z.

In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Vol. 12, No. 1-2, 2011, p. 25-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Face' across historical cultures

T2 - Journal of Historical Pragmatics

AU - Ruhi, Sükriye

AU - Kádár, Dániel Z.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This paper investigates the use of the word 'face' in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Turkish and Chinese so as to trace the meaning of the concept in the two languages and cultures. The study describes the occurrence of the lexeme in five semantic/pragmatic domains in novels dating from the turn of the twentieth century, a period that corresponds to an acceleration in modernisation movements. Two conclusions are drawn from the comparison of face in Turkish and Chinese, and noteworthy similarities and differences are shown. The interpersonal and the emotional domains cover a wide usage area but form mirror images of each other in terms of the frequency of the tokens. Yet, the Chinese novels reveal more metapragmatic discourse on talk. This is interpreted as face forming a profound emic notion in Chinese culture, which encompasses both relational management and the social worth of the person, while the Turkish novels suggest that it is an "idiom" primarily employed for describing relational management style.

AB - This paper investigates the use of the word 'face' in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Turkish and Chinese so as to trace the meaning of the concept in the two languages and cultures. The study describes the occurrence of the lexeme in five semantic/pragmatic domains in novels dating from the turn of the twentieth century, a period that corresponds to an acceleration in modernisation movements. Two conclusions are drawn from the comparison of face in Turkish and Chinese, and noteworthy similarities and differences are shown. The interpersonal and the emotional domains cover a wide usage area but form mirror images of each other in terms of the frequency of the tokens. Yet, the Chinese novels reveal more metapragmatic discourse on talk. This is interpreted as face forming a profound emic notion in Chinese culture, which encompasses both relational management and the social worth of the person, while the Turkish novels suggest that it is an "idiom" primarily employed for describing relational management style.

KW - Emic

KW - Face

KW - Nineteenth and early twentieth centuries

KW - Turkish and Chinese novels

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958762359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.02ruh

DO - 10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.02ruh

M3 - Review article

VL - 12

SP - 25

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Historical Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Historical Pragmatics

SN - 1566-5852

IS - 1-2

ER -