Facilitating good process in primary palliative care

Does the Gold Standards Framework enable quality performance?

Daniel Munday, Kashifa Mahmood, Jeremy Dale, Nigel King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Palliative care is an important, complex aspect of primary care, requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The Gold Standards Framework (GSF), a programme used by over 3000 UK practices, aims to facilitate high-quality palliative care through the introduction of systematic clinical and organizational processes. Quality payments for palliative care are available to UK practices which maintain registers and hold multidisciplinary meetings. Objectives. To explore the effectiveness and sustainability of the implementation of GSF at practice level. Methods. The study followed a qualitative comparative case study design using in-depth interviews and observational data with 15 practices participating in GSF, from three areas differing in socio-geography. Semi-structured interviews (total 45) with GPs, community nurses and practice managers were supplemented by observation of practice meetings and systems, to provide contextual insights. Transcribed interviews were analysed using a thematic matrix approach and comparisons were made within and between practices. Practices were identified on a continuum of performance (high, medium and minimal) according to the evidence of functioning in palliative care-related activity. Results. Considerable variation existed between practices in both the extent of palliative care-related processes and the effectiveness of inter-professional communication. High-performing practices displayed a clear-shared purpose for palliative care with effective communication, whereas minimal performing practices demonstrated little utilization of basic GSF processes and deficiencies in inter-professional communication. Conclusion. Effective palliative care requires good team relationships and robust processes. While GSF can enable such improvements, quality measures focusing on processes alone are inadequate to distinguish good practice, questioning the effectiveness of current quality measures in UK general practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)486-494
Number of pages9
JournalFamily Practice
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Primary Health Care
Communication
Interviews
Geography
Quality of Health Care
Quality Improvement
General Practice
Nurses
Observation

Cite this

@article{678ce00f37cf4e558c848fa6bcac6269,
title = "Facilitating good process in primary palliative care: Does the Gold Standards Framework enable quality performance?",
abstract = "Background. Palliative care is an important, complex aspect of primary care, requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The Gold Standards Framework (GSF), a programme used by over 3000 UK practices, aims to facilitate high-quality palliative care through the introduction of systematic clinical and organizational processes. Quality payments for palliative care are available to UK practices which maintain registers and hold multidisciplinary meetings. Objectives. To explore the effectiveness and sustainability of the implementation of GSF at practice level. Methods. The study followed a qualitative comparative case study design using in-depth interviews and observational data with 15 practices participating in GSF, from three areas differing in socio-geography. Semi-structured interviews (total 45) with GPs, community nurses and practice managers were supplemented by observation of practice meetings and systems, to provide contextual insights. Transcribed interviews were analysed using a thematic matrix approach and comparisons were made within and between practices. Practices were identified on a continuum of performance (high, medium and minimal) according to the evidence of functioning in palliative care-related activity. Results. Considerable variation existed between practices in both the extent of palliative care-related processes and the effectiveness of inter-professional communication. High-performing practices displayed a clear-shared purpose for palliative care with effective communication, whereas minimal performing practices demonstrated little utilization of basic GSF processes and deficiencies in inter-professional communication. Conclusion. Effective palliative care requires good team relationships and robust processes. While GSF can enable such improvements, quality measures focusing on processes alone are inadequate to distinguish good practice, questioning the effectiveness of current quality measures in UK general practice.",
keywords = "District nursing, General practice, Inter-professional relations, Palliative care",
author = "Daniel Munday and Kashifa Mahmood and Jeremy Dale and Nigel King",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/fampra/cmm045",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "486--494",
journal = "Family Practice",
issn = "0263-2136",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

Facilitating good process in primary palliative care : Does the Gold Standards Framework enable quality performance? / Munday, Daniel; Mahmood, Kashifa; Dale, Jeremy; King, Nigel.

In: Family Practice, Vol. 24, No. 5, 01.10.2007, p. 486-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facilitating good process in primary palliative care

T2 - Does the Gold Standards Framework enable quality performance?

AU - Munday, Daniel

AU - Mahmood, Kashifa

AU - Dale, Jeremy

AU - King, Nigel

PY - 2007/10/1

Y1 - 2007/10/1

N2 - Background. Palliative care is an important, complex aspect of primary care, requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The Gold Standards Framework (GSF), a programme used by over 3000 UK practices, aims to facilitate high-quality palliative care through the introduction of systematic clinical and organizational processes. Quality payments for palliative care are available to UK practices which maintain registers and hold multidisciplinary meetings. Objectives. To explore the effectiveness and sustainability of the implementation of GSF at practice level. Methods. The study followed a qualitative comparative case study design using in-depth interviews and observational data with 15 practices participating in GSF, from three areas differing in socio-geography. Semi-structured interviews (total 45) with GPs, community nurses and practice managers were supplemented by observation of practice meetings and systems, to provide contextual insights. Transcribed interviews were analysed using a thematic matrix approach and comparisons were made within and between practices. Practices were identified on a continuum of performance (high, medium and minimal) according to the evidence of functioning in palliative care-related activity. Results. Considerable variation existed between practices in both the extent of palliative care-related processes and the effectiveness of inter-professional communication. High-performing practices displayed a clear-shared purpose for palliative care with effective communication, whereas minimal performing practices demonstrated little utilization of basic GSF processes and deficiencies in inter-professional communication. Conclusion. Effective palliative care requires good team relationships and robust processes. While GSF can enable such improvements, quality measures focusing on processes alone are inadequate to distinguish good practice, questioning the effectiveness of current quality measures in UK general practice.

AB - Background. Palliative care is an important, complex aspect of primary care, requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The Gold Standards Framework (GSF), a programme used by over 3000 UK practices, aims to facilitate high-quality palliative care through the introduction of systematic clinical and organizational processes. Quality payments for palliative care are available to UK practices which maintain registers and hold multidisciplinary meetings. Objectives. To explore the effectiveness and sustainability of the implementation of GSF at practice level. Methods. The study followed a qualitative comparative case study design using in-depth interviews and observational data with 15 practices participating in GSF, from three areas differing in socio-geography. Semi-structured interviews (total 45) with GPs, community nurses and practice managers were supplemented by observation of practice meetings and systems, to provide contextual insights. Transcribed interviews were analysed using a thematic matrix approach and comparisons were made within and between practices. Practices were identified on a continuum of performance (high, medium and minimal) according to the evidence of functioning in palliative care-related activity. Results. Considerable variation existed between practices in both the extent of palliative care-related processes and the effectiveness of inter-professional communication. High-performing practices displayed a clear-shared purpose for palliative care with effective communication, whereas minimal performing practices demonstrated little utilization of basic GSF processes and deficiencies in inter-professional communication. Conclusion. Effective palliative care requires good team relationships and robust processes. While GSF can enable such improvements, quality measures focusing on processes alone are inadequate to distinguish good practice, questioning the effectiveness of current quality measures in UK general practice.

KW - District nursing

KW - General practice

KW - Inter-professional relations

KW - Palliative care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36348990136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/fampra/cmm045

DO - 10.1093/fampra/cmm045

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 486

EP - 494

JO - Family Practice

JF - Family Practice

SN - 0263-2136

IS - 5

ER -