Factors affecting the cutting ability of sonic files

P. J. Lumley, E. Harrington, E. Aspinwall, L. Blunt, A. D. Walmsley, P. M. Marquis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the cutting ability of sonic files. A model system was developed and the following variables evaluated: file type, Heliosonic or Shaper; file length, 21 or 29 mm; power, air inlet ring opening of half or fully open; stroke length, 2 or 4 mm; stroke rate, one or two cycles per second; and load 50 or 100 g. A 26 full-factorial analysis with two replications into the effect of the above variables on the cutting ability of the MM1500 sonic instrument was performed. A new size 25 file was used for each cut, together with water irrigation, and the substrate used was 1-mm thick sections of bovine bone. The differences between the variables were significant (ANOVA, P<0.001). However, examination of the F-values showed that the most significant variable to affect cutting was load, followed by power, file type, stroke length and stroke rate, with the least significant variable being file length. The most significant interaction was between rate and length of stroke. An increase in stroke rate from one to two cycles per second at a stroke length of 2 mm produced an increase in cutting for both the Heliosonic and Shaper files. However, at the longer stroke length of 4 mm, the same increase in rate resulted in a decrease in cutting for the Shaper files. Therefore, it is suggested that operators should press the file against the canal wall and move it slowly to maximize cutting.

LanguageEnglish
Pages173-178
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Endodontic Journal
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stroke
Analysis of Variance
Air
Bone and Bones
Water

Cite this

Lumley, P. J., Harrington, E., Aspinwall, E., Blunt, L., Walmsley, A. D., & Marquis, P. M. (1996). Factors affecting the cutting ability of sonic files. International Endodontic Journal, 29(3), 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01365.x
Lumley, P. J. ; Harrington, E. ; Aspinwall, E. ; Blunt, L. ; Walmsley, A. D. ; Marquis, P. M. / Factors affecting the cutting ability of sonic files. In: International Endodontic Journal. 1996 ; Vol. 29, No. 3. pp. 173-178.
@article{c9d4e420995346548810cac7c132796d,
title = "Factors affecting the cutting ability of sonic files",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to investigate the cutting ability of sonic files. A model system was developed and the following variables evaluated: file type, Heliosonic or Shaper; file length, 21 or 29 mm; power, air inlet ring opening of half or fully open; stroke length, 2 or 4 mm; stroke rate, one or two cycles per second; and load 50 or 100 g. A 26 full-factorial analysis with two replications into the effect of the above variables on the cutting ability of the MM1500 sonic instrument was performed. A new size 25 file was used for each cut, together with water irrigation, and the substrate used was 1-mm thick sections of bovine bone. The differences between the variables were significant (ANOVA, P<0.001). However, examination of the F-values showed that the most significant variable to affect cutting was load, followed by power, file type, stroke length and stroke rate, with the least significant variable being file length. The most significant interaction was between rate and length of stroke. An increase in stroke rate from one to two cycles per second at a stroke length of 2 mm produced an increase in cutting for both the Heliosonic and Shaper files. However, at the longer stroke length of 4 mm, the same increase in rate resulted in a decrease in cutting for the Shaper files. Therefore, it is suggested that operators should press the file against the canal wall and move it slowly to maximize cutting.",
keywords = "Cutting, Factorial analysis, Sonic",
author = "Lumley, {P. J.} and E. Harrington and E. Aspinwall and L. Blunt and Walmsley, {A. D.} and Marquis, {P. M.}",
year = "1996",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01365.x",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "173--178",
journal = "International Endodontic Journal",
issn = "0143-2885",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Lumley, PJ, Harrington, E, Aspinwall, E, Blunt, L, Walmsley, AD & Marquis, PM 1996, 'Factors affecting the cutting ability of sonic files', International Endodontic Journal, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01365.x

Factors affecting the cutting ability of sonic files. / Lumley, P. J.; Harrington, E.; Aspinwall, E.; Blunt, L.; Walmsley, A. D.; Marquis, P. M.

In: International Endodontic Journal, Vol. 29, No. 3, 05.1996, p. 173-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting the cutting ability of sonic files

AU - Lumley, P. J.

AU - Harrington, E.

AU - Aspinwall, E.

AU - Blunt, L.

AU - Walmsley, A. D.

AU - Marquis, P. M.

PY - 1996/5

Y1 - 1996/5

N2 - The aim of this study was to investigate the cutting ability of sonic files. A model system was developed and the following variables evaluated: file type, Heliosonic or Shaper; file length, 21 or 29 mm; power, air inlet ring opening of half or fully open; stroke length, 2 or 4 mm; stroke rate, one or two cycles per second; and load 50 or 100 g. A 26 full-factorial analysis with two replications into the effect of the above variables on the cutting ability of the MM1500 sonic instrument was performed. A new size 25 file was used for each cut, together with water irrigation, and the substrate used was 1-mm thick sections of bovine bone. The differences between the variables were significant (ANOVA, P<0.001). However, examination of the F-values showed that the most significant variable to affect cutting was load, followed by power, file type, stroke length and stroke rate, with the least significant variable being file length. The most significant interaction was between rate and length of stroke. An increase in stroke rate from one to two cycles per second at a stroke length of 2 mm produced an increase in cutting for both the Heliosonic and Shaper files. However, at the longer stroke length of 4 mm, the same increase in rate resulted in a decrease in cutting for the Shaper files. Therefore, it is suggested that operators should press the file against the canal wall and move it slowly to maximize cutting.

AB - The aim of this study was to investigate the cutting ability of sonic files. A model system was developed and the following variables evaluated: file type, Heliosonic or Shaper; file length, 21 or 29 mm; power, air inlet ring opening of half or fully open; stroke length, 2 or 4 mm; stroke rate, one or two cycles per second; and load 50 or 100 g. A 26 full-factorial analysis with two replications into the effect of the above variables on the cutting ability of the MM1500 sonic instrument was performed. A new size 25 file was used for each cut, together with water irrigation, and the substrate used was 1-mm thick sections of bovine bone. The differences between the variables were significant (ANOVA, P<0.001). However, examination of the F-values showed that the most significant variable to affect cutting was load, followed by power, file type, stroke length and stroke rate, with the least significant variable being file length. The most significant interaction was between rate and length of stroke. An increase in stroke rate from one to two cycles per second at a stroke length of 2 mm produced an increase in cutting for both the Heliosonic and Shaper files. However, at the longer stroke length of 4 mm, the same increase in rate resulted in a decrease in cutting for the Shaper files. Therefore, it is suggested that operators should press the file against the canal wall and move it slowly to maximize cutting.

KW - Cutting

KW - Factorial analysis

KW - Sonic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030132775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01365.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01365.x

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 173

EP - 178

JO - International Endodontic Journal

T2 - International Endodontic Journal

JF - International Endodontic Journal

SN - 0143-2885

IS - 3

ER -