Factors impacting perceived safety among staff working on mental health wards

Alina Haines, Andrew Brown, Rhainnah McCabe, Michelle Rogerson, Richard Whittington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:
Safety at work is a core issue for mental health staff working on in-patient units. At present, there is a limited theoretical base regarding which factors may affect staff perceptions of safety.

Aims:
This study attempted to identify which factors affect perceived staff safety working on in-patient mental health wards.

Method:
A cross-sectional design was employed across 101 forensic and non-forensic mental health wards, over seven National Health Service trusts nationally. Measures included an
online staff survey, Ward Features Checklist and recorded incident data. Data were analysed using categorical principal components analysis and ordinal regression.

Results:
Perceptions of staff safety were increased by ward brightness, higher number of patient beds, lower staff to patient ratios, less dayroom space and more urban views.

Conclusions:
The findings from this study do not represent common-sense assumptions. Results are discussed in the context of the literature and may have implications for current initiatives aimed at managing in-patient violence and aggression.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-211
Number of pages8
JournalBJ Psych Open
Volume3
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Safety
National Health Programs
Principal Component Analysis
Checklist
Aggression
Violence

Cite this

Haines, Alina ; Brown, Andrew ; McCabe, Rhainnah ; Rogerson, Michelle ; Whittington, Richard. / Factors impacting perceived safety among staff working on mental health wards. In: BJ Psych Open. 2017 ; Vol. 3, No. 5. pp. 204-211.
@article{baa5cefcbfb94d49935b2172cc1caa82,
title = "Factors impacting perceived safety among staff working on mental health wards",
abstract = "Background:Safety at work is a core issue for mental health staff working on in-patient units. At present, there is a limited theoretical base regarding which factors may affect staff perceptions of safety.Aims:This study attempted to identify which factors affect perceived staff safety working on in-patient mental health wards.Method:A cross-sectional design was employed across 101 forensic and non-forensic mental health wards, over seven National Health Service trusts nationally. Measures included anonline staff survey, Ward Features Checklist and recorded incident data. Data were analysed using categorical principal components analysis and ordinal regression.Results:Perceptions of staff safety were increased by ward brightness, higher number of patient beds, lower staff to patient ratios, less dayroom space and more urban views.Conclusions:The findings from this study do not represent common-sense assumptions. Results are discussed in the context of the literature and may have implications for current initiatives aimed at managing in-patient violence and aggression.",
author = "Alina Haines and Andrew Brown and Rhainnah McCabe and Michelle Rogerson and Richard Whittington",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1192/bjpo.bp.117.005280",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "204--211",
journal = "BJPsych Open",
issn = "2056-4724",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",

}

Factors impacting perceived safety among staff working on mental health wards. / Haines, Alina; Brown, Andrew; McCabe, Rhainnah; Rogerson, Michelle; Whittington, Richard.

In: BJ Psych Open, Vol. 3, No. 5, 05.09.2017, p. 204-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors impacting perceived safety among staff working on mental health wards

AU - Haines, Alina

AU - Brown, Andrew

AU - McCabe, Rhainnah

AU - Rogerson, Michelle

AU - Whittington, Richard

PY - 2017/9/5

Y1 - 2017/9/5

N2 - Background:Safety at work is a core issue for mental health staff working on in-patient units. At present, there is a limited theoretical base regarding which factors may affect staff perceptions of safety.Aims:This study attempted to identify which factors affect perceived staff safety working on in-patient mental health wards.Method:A cross-sectional design was employed across 101 forensic and non-forensic mental health wards, over seven National Health Service trusts nationally. Measures included anonline staff survey, Ward Features Checklist and recorded incident data. Data were analysed using categorical principal components analysis and ordinal regression.Results:Perceptions of staff safety were increased by ward brightness, higher number of patient beds, lower staff to patient ratios, less dayroom space and more urban views.Conclusions:The findings from this study do not represent common-sense assumptions. Results are discussed in the context of the literature and may have implications for current initiatives aimed at managing in-patient violence and aggression.

AB - Background:Safety at work is a core issue for mental health staff working on in-patient units. At present, there is a limited theoretical base regarding which factors may affect staff perceptions of safety.Aims:This study attempted to identify which factors affect perceived staff safety working on in-patient mental health wards.Method:A cross-sectional design was employed across 101 forensic and non-forensic mental health wards, over seven National Health Service trusts nationally. Measures included anonline staff survey, Ward Features Checklist and recorded incident data. Data were analysed using categorical principal components analysis and ordinal regression.Results:Perceptions of staff safety were increased by ward brightness, higher number of patient beds, lower staff to patient ratios, less dayroom space and more urban views.Conclusions:The findings from this study do not represent common-sense assumptions. Results are discussed in the context of the literature and may have implications for current initiatives aimed at managing in-patient violence and aggression.

UR - http://bjpo.rcpsych.org/content/3/5

U2 - 10.1192/bjpo.bp.117.005280

DO - 10.1192/bjpo.bp.117.005280

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 204

EP - 211

JO - BJPsych Open

JF - BJPsych Open

SN - 2056-4724

IS - 5

ER -