Self-tracking most notably emerged over the last century (Crawford et al. 2015). To self-track is to record life activities, encoding them into a series of quantified variables–or what has been called “health” and “lifestyle” data (Whooley et al. 2014, 153). Commonly, this is practiced with wearable de- vices, such as wristbands (FitBit), necklaces (Misfit), pendants, and badges (Narrative Clip), which are tethered to smartphones and personal computers. Through these devices, a meal is measured by its calorific quantity, a heartbeat measured by its rate, and sitting at a desk is rendered the calculable accumulation of inactivity. Yet, this perspective on health and lifestyle is not particularly new. Defining food as energy, knowing the importance of a regular heart rate and the value of exercise are staple points of advice in general medical practice. However, these are no longer exclusively “medical␣ perceptions.
|Title of host publication||The Failed Individual|
|Subtitle of host publication||Amid Exclusion, Resistance, and the Pleasure of Non-Conformity|
|Editors||Katharina Motyl, Regina Schober|
|Place of Publication||Frankfurt|
|Number of pages||18|
|Publication status||Published - 12 Jun 2018|
Dyer, J. (2018). Failing by Design: Self-Tracking and the Failed Individual. In K. Motyl, & R. Schober (Eds.), The Failed Individual : Amid Exclusion, Resistance, and the Pleasure of Non-Conformity (pp. 357-374). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.