Families at a disadvantage

Class, culture and literacies

Lyn Tett, Jim Crowther

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of diverse literacies, and the problems of privileging a dominant form of literacy at the expense of those from non-mainstream cultures. It uses data from a family literacy project to illustrate how the actual literacy practices of working-class families and communities can be incorporated into learning programmes. It argues that whilst familiarity with the dominant forms of spoken and written language is a vital ingredient in adults' and children's communicative functioning, it should not be the unchallenged objective of education. Instead opportunities to legitimate the vernacular literacies of the home and community should be sought. In so doing deficit views of families at a disadvantage can be replaced by views that positively value the home culture to the benefit of both the home and the school.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)449-460
Number of pages12
JournalBritish Educational Research Journal
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

literacy
written language
spoken language
working class
community
deficit
school
learning
Values
education

Cite this

@article{16ac031c6afb4ef08bab3300ba57f51b,
title = "Families at a disadvantage: Class, culture and literacies",
abstract = "This paper addresses the issue of diverse literacies, and the problems of privileging a dominant form of literacy at the expense of those from non-mainstream cultures. It uses data from a family literacy project to illustrate how the actual literacy practices of working-class families and communities can be incorporated into learning programmes. It argues that whilst familiarity with the dominant forms of spoken and written language is a vital ingredient in adults' and children's communicative functioning, it should not be the unchallenged objective of education. Instead opportunities to legitimate the vernacular literacies of the home and community should be sought. In so doing deficit views of families at a disadvantage can be replaced by views that positively value the home culture to the benefit of both the home and the school.",
author = "Lyn Tett and Jim Crowther",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0141192980240406",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "449--460",
journal = "British Educational Research Journal",
issn = "0141-1926",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Families at a disadvantage : Class, culture and literacies. / Tett, Lyn; Crowther, Jim.

In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.09.1998, p. 449-460.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Families at a disadvantage

T2 - Class, culture and literacies

AU - Tett, Lyn

AU - Crowther, Jim

PY - 1998/9/1

Y1 - 1998/9/1

N2 - This paper addresses the issue of diverse literacies, and the problems of privileging a dominant form of literacy at the expense of those from non-mainstream cultures. It uses data from a family literacy project to illustrate how the actual literacy practices of working-class families and communities can be incorporated into learning programmes. It argues that whilst familiarity with the dominant forms of spoken and written language is a vital ingredient in adults' and children's communicative functioning, it should not be the unchallenged objective of education. Instead opportunities to legitimate the vernacular literacies of the home and community should be sought. In so doing deficit views of families at a disadvantage can be replaced by views that positively value the home culture to the benefit of both the home and the school.

AB - This paper addresses the issue of diverse literacies, and the problems of privileging a dominant form of literacy at the expense of those from non-mainstream cultures. It uses data from a family literacy project to illustrate how the actual literacy practices of working-class families and communities can be incorporated into learning programmes. It argues that whilst familiarity with the dominant forms of spoken and written language is a vital ingredient in adults' and children's communicative functioning, it should not be the unchallenged objective of education. Instead opportunities to legitimate the vernacular literacies of the home and community should be sought. In so doing deficit views of families at a disadvantage can be replaced by views that positively value the home culture to the benefit of both the home and the school.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032335307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0141192980240406

DO - 10.1080/0141192980240406

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 449

EP - 460

JO - British Educational Research Journal

JF - British Educational Research Journal

SN - 0141-1926

IS - 4

ER -