Feasibility and acceptability of procedures for a pragmatic trial of reduced exertion, high-intensity interval training with nondiabetic hyperglycaemia patients within a national health service practice setting

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting Abstract

Abstract

Formal Medical Research Council guidance highlights the requirement for greater attention to be given to the initial development of healthcare interventions. This is relevant for exercise interventions since they are frequently shown to bring about intended effects under ideal circumstances, but fail to demonstrate effectiveness when translated to real-world contexts. The aim of this research was to carry out a feasibility study to describe and report data relevant to the acceptability of a reduced-exertion, high-intensity interval training (REHIT) intervention for non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH) patients, delivered in a National Health Service practice setting. The purpose was to assess whether it would be appropriate to progress to a larger-scale pragmatic trial, and to optimise the design and conduct of any such trial. The intention was to recruit 40 participants from a single centre, which was considered adequate to
meet the objectives of the study. Patients were eligible to take part if they were diagnostically defined as NDH based on a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value of 42–46 mmol· mol. The study revealed several issues including patient eligibility, challenges to recruitment, and poor clinician engagement. Ninety six patients were identified and screened for eligibility, but 51 were not eligible. The main reason was that 26 participants (27% of the total screened), since original diagnosis, were no longer within the diagnostic range for NDH with blood glucose control either having moved to overt type 2 diabetes or euglycaemia.
Despite the simplicity and convenience of using HbA1c to assess diabetes risk, the process of accurately screening and case finding eligible patients was problematic with just seven participants volunteering to take part in the study. Some aspects of the intervention worked well. Adherence to the exercise intervention was high, with 97% of sessions completed for the participants that finished the study (n = 6). The small sample limits interpretation of data, thus it is not possible to estimate variability of intended outcomes in a formal sample size calculation for a full-scale trial. Although the trial is not feasible in its current form, this preparatory stage of trial design pre-empted problems
with the intervention that could be changed to optimise the design and conduct of a larger-scale trial to improve transferability of REHIT into real-life scenarios. Solutions to the issues identified include using a dedicated local recruiter with a strong relationship among the patients and healthcare team, using participant incentives to take part, and allowing for a longer recruitment period. Interventions must also be sensitive to the built environment, socioeconomic factors, and the medical needs of individual patients. It follows that a compromise must be made between scientific robustness and generalisability to
routine real-world contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberD2.S1.2(3)
Pages (from-to)57
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume36
Issue numberS1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018
EventBASES Annual Conference 2018 - Harrogate Convention Centre, Harrogate, United Kingdom
Duration: 27 Nov 201828 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Pragmatic Clinical Trials
National Health Programs
Hyperglycemia
Exercise
Patient Care Team
Glycosylated Hemoglobin A
Feasibility Studies
High-Intensity Interval Training
Sample Size
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Blood Glucose
Biomedical Research
Motivation
Delivery of Health Care

Cite this

@article{d8d168b08a06456b8eeaed0a33c113e2,
title = "Feasibility and acceptability of procedures for a pragmatic trial of reduced exertion, high-intensity interval training with nondiabetic hyperglycaemia patients within a national health service practice setting",
abstract = "Formal Medical Research Council guidance highlights the requirement for greater attention to be given to the initial development of healthcare interventions. This is relevant for exercise interventions since they are frequently shown to bring about intended effects under ideal circumstances, but fail to demonstrate effectiveness when translated to real-world contexts. The aim of this research was to carry out a feasibility study to describe and report data relevant to the acceptability of a reduced-exertion, high-intensity interval training (REHIT) intervention for non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH) patients, delivered in a National Health Service practice setting. The purpose was to assess whether it would be appropriate to progress to a larger-scale pragmatic trial, and to optimise the design and conduct of any such trial. The intention was to recruit 40 participants from a single centre, which was considered adequate tomeet the objectives of the study. Patients were eligible to take part if they were diagnostically defined as NDH based on a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value of 42–46 mmol· mol. The study revealed several issues including patient eligibility, challenges to recruitment, and poor clinician engagement. Ninety six patients were identified and screened for eligibility, but 51 were not eligible. The main reason was that 26 participants (27{\%} of the total screened), since original diagnosis, were no longer within the diagnostic range for NDH with blood glucose control either having moved to overt type 2 diabetes or euglycaemia.Despite the simplicity and convenience of using HbA1c to assess diabetes risk, the process of accurately screening and case finding eligible patients was problematic with just seven participants volunteering to take part in the study. Some aspects of the intervention worked well. Adherence to the exercise intervention was high, with 97{\%} of sessions completed for the participants that finished the study (n = 6). The small sample limits interpretation of data, thus it is not possible to estimate variability of intended outcomes in a formal sample size calculation for a full-scale trial. Although the trial is not feasible in its current form, this preparatory stage of trial design pre-empted problemswith the intervention that could be changed to optimise the design and conduct of a larger-scale trial to improve transferability of REHIT into real-life scenarios. Solutions to the issues identified include using a dedicated local recruiter with a strong relationship among the patients and healthcare team, using participant incentives to take part, and allowing for a longer recruitment period. Interventions must also be sensitive to the built environment, socioeconomic factors, and the medical needs of individual patients. It follows that a compromise must be made between scientific robustness and generalisability toroutine real-world contexts.",
author = "Matthew Haines",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/02640414.2018.1521633",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "57",
journal = "Journal of Sports Sciences",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility and acceptability of procedures for a pragmatic trial of reduced exertion, high-intensity interval training with nondiabetic hyperglycaemia patients within a national health service practice setting

AU - Haines, Matthew

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - Formal Medical Research Council guidance highlights the requirement for greater attention to be given to the initial development of healthcare interventions. This is relevant for exercise interventions since they are frequently shown to bring about intended effects under ideal circumstances, but fail to demonstrate effectiveness when translated to real-world contexts. The aim of this research was to carry out a feasibility study to describe and report data relevant to the acceptability of a reduced-exertion, high-intensity interval training (REHIT) intervention for non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH) patients, delivered in a National Health Service practice setting. The purpose was to assess whether it would be appropriate to progress to a larger-scale pragmatic trial, and to optimise the design and conduct of any such trial. The intention was to recruit 40 participants from a single centre, which was considered adequate tomeet the objectives of the study. Patients were eligible to take part if they were diagnostically defined as NDH based on a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value of 42–46 mmol· mol. The study revealed several issues including patient eligibility, challenges to recruitment, and poor clinician engagement. Ninety six patients were identified and screened for eligibility, but 51 were not eligible. The main reason was that 26 participants (27% of the total screened), since original diagnosis, were no longer within the diagnostic range for NDH with blood glucose control either having moved to overt type 2 diabetes or euglycaemia.Despite the simplicity and convenience of using HbA1c to assess diabetes risk, the process of accurately screening and case finding eligible patients was problematic with just seven participants volunteering to take part in the study. Some aspects of the intervention worked well. Adherence to the exercise intervention was high, with 97% of sessions completed for the participants that finished the study (n = 6). The small sample limits interpretation of data, thus it is not possible to estimate variability of intended outcomes in a formal sample size calculation for a full-scale trial. Although the trial is not feasible in its current form, this preparatory stage of trial design pre-empted problemswith the intervention that could be changed to optimise the design and conduct of a larger-scale trial to improve transferability of REHIT into real-life scenarios. Solutions to the issues identified include using a dedicated local recruiter with a strong relationship among the patients and healthcare team, using participant incentives to take part, and allowing for a longer recruitment period. Interventions must also be sensitive to the built environment, socioeconomic factors, and the medical needs of individual patients. It follows that a compromise must be made between scientific robustness and generalisability toroutine real-world contexts.

AB - Formal Medical Research Council guidance highlights the requirement for greater attention to be given to the initial development of healthcare interventions. This is relevant for exercise interventions since they are frequently shown to bring about intended effects under ideal circumstances, but fail to demonstrate effectiveness when translated to real-world contexts. The aim of this research was to carry out a feasibility study to describe and report data relevant to the acceptability of a reduced-exertion, high-intensity interval training (REHIT) intervention for non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH) patients, delivered in a National Health Service practice setting. The purpose was to assess whether it would be appropriate to progress to a larger-scale pragmatic trial, and to optimise the design and conduct of any such trial. The intention was to recruit 40 participants from a single centre, which was considered adequate tomeet the objectives of the study. Patients were eligible to take part if they were diagnostically defined as NDH based on a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value of 42–46 mmol· mol. The study revealed several issues including patient eligibility, challenges to recruitment, and poor clinician engagement. Ninety six patients were identified and screened for eligibility, but 51 were not eligible. The main reason was that 26 participants (27% of the total screened), since original diagnosis, were no longer within the diagnostic range for NDH with blood glucose control either having moved to overt type 2 diabetes or euglycaemia.Despite the simplicity and convenience of using HbA1c to assess diabetes risk, the process of accurately screening and case finding eligible patients was problematic with just seven participants volunteering to take part in the study. Some aspects of the intervention worked well. Adherence to the exercise intervention was high, with 97% of sessions completed for the participants that finished the study (n = 6). The small sample limits interpretation of data, thus it is not possible to estimate variability of intended outcomes in a formal sample size calculation for a full-scale trial. Although the trial is not feasible in its current form, this preparatory stage of trial design pre-empted problemswith the intervention that could be changed to optimise the design and conduct of a larger-scale trial to improve transferability of REHIT into real-life scenarios. Solutions to the issues identified include using a dedicated local recruiter with a strong relationship among the patients and healthcare team, using participant incentives to take part, and allowing for a longer recruitment period. Interventions must also be sensitive to the built environment, socioeconomic factors, and the medical needs of individual patients. It follows that a compromise must be made between scientific robustness and generalisability toroutine real-world contexts.

U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2018.1521633

DO - 10.1080/02640414.2018.1521633

M3 - Meeting Abstract

VL - 36

SP - 57

JO - Journal of Sports Sciences

JF - Journal of Sports Sciences

SN - 0264-0414

IS - S1

M1 - D2.S1.2(3)

ER -