Feedback on Quality

Patients’ Experience of Surgical Care

Emilie Roberts, Ralph Leavey, David Allen, Graham Gibbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a growing consensus within the NHS of the importance of obtaining feedback from patients in order to improve the quality of health care; consequently, many patient satisfaction surveys are now undertaken. However, much research is based on provider‐held assumptions about service quality. This study focuses on patient satisfaction with coronary bypass surgery, starting with the concerns expressed by patients and using these as a basis for evaluating different aspects of care. The paired comparison technique was employed to produce a ranked list of aspects of care that were perceived to be in greatest need of improvement. Some difficulties were encountered in administering the ranking technique to patients in a highly specialized health‐care setting; however, results were obtained and validated for follow‐up patients. The item of most concern to these patients was a lack of sensitivity about when patients felt ready for discharge.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-32
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Patient Satisfaction
Matched-Pair Analysis
Quality of Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
Research
Healthcare
Patient satisfaction
Surveys and Questionnaires
Ranking
Surgery
Service quality
Paired comparisons

Cite this

Roberts, Emilie ; Leavey, Ralph ; Allen, David ; Gibbs, Graham. / Feedback on Quality : Patients’ Experience of Surgical Care. In: International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 1994 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 27-32.
@article{97f2bb0b553a4574b8d805ee64d88ee7,
title = "Feedback on Quality: Patients’ Experience of Surgical Care",
abstract = "There is a growing consensus within the NHS of the importance of obtaining feedback from patients in order to improve the quality of health care; consequently, many patient satisfaction surveys are now undertaken. However, much research is based on provider‐held assumptions about service quality. This study focuses on patient satisfaction with coronary bypass surgery, starting with the concerns expressed by patients and using these as a basis for evaluating different aspects of care. The paired comparison technique was employed to produce a ranked list of aspects of care that were perceived to be in greatest need of improvement. Some difficulties were encountered in administering the ranking technique to patients in a highly specialized health‐care setting; however, results were obtained and validated for follow‐up patients. The item of most concern to these patients was a lack of sensitivity about when patients felt ready for discharge.",
keywords = "Health care, Hospitals, Quality, Service quality, United Kingdom",
author = "Emilie Roberts and Ralph Leavey and David Allen and Graham Gibbs",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1108/09526869410059727",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "27--32",
journal = "International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance",
issn = "0952-6862",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Feedback on Quality : Patients’ Experience of Surgical Care. / Roberts, Emilie; Leavey, Ralph; Allen, David; Gibbs, Graham.

In: International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1994, p. 27-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feedback on Quality

T2 - Patients’ Experience of Surgical Care

AU - Roberts, Emilie

AU - Leavey, Ralph

AU - Allen, David

AU - Gibbs, Graham

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - There is a growing consensus within the NHS of the importance of obtaining feedback from patients in order to improve the quality of health care; consequently, many patient satisfaction surveys are now undertaken. However, much research is based on provider‐held assumptions about service quality. This study focuses on patient satisfaction with coronary bypass surgery, starting with the concerns expressed by patients and using these as a basis for evaluating different aspects of care. The paired comparison technique was employed to produce a ranked list of aspects of care that were perceived to be in greatest need of improvement. Some difficulties were encountered in administering the ranking technique to patients in a highly specialized health‐care setting; however, results were obtained and validated for follow‐up patients. The item of most concern to these patients was a lack of sensitivity about when patients felt ready for discharge.

AB - There is a growing consensus within the NHS of the importance of obtaining feedback from patients in order to improve the quality of health care; consequently, many patient satisfaction surveys are now undertaken. However, much research is based on provider‐held assumptions about service quality. This study focuses on patient satisfaction with coronary bypass surgery, starting with the concerns expressed by patients and using these as a basis for evaluating different aspects of care. The paired comparison technique was employed to produce a ranked list of aspects of care that were perceived to be in greatest need of improvement. Some difficulties were encountered in administering the ranking technique to patients in a highly specialized health‐care setting; however, results were obtained and validated for follow‐up patients. The item of most concern to these patients was a lack of sensitivity about when patients felt ready for discharge.

KW - Health care

KW - Hospitals

KW - Quality

KW - Service quality

KW - United Kingdom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028310689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/09526869410059727

DO - 10.1108/09526869410059727

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 27

EP - 32

JO - International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

JF - International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

SN - 0952-6862

IS - 3

ER -