Fiddly Jobs, Undeclared Work and the Something for Nothing Society

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

155 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whilst it may be easy to dismiss ideological diatribes about 'a something for nothing society' as empty rhetoric, there are relatively few recent studies with which to assess claims about 'benefit scroungers' and 'dole fiddlers'. Qualitative methods were employed to explore the ways in which some working-class people in an economically depressed locality did 'fiddly jobs' (i.e. working 'undeclared' whilst in receipt of unemployment benefits). The research explored the motivations underpinning fiddly work and the normative values surrounding it. Informants expressed a clear and conservative morality which stood at odds with descriptions of a 'welfare underclass' or 'dependency culture': most common types of fiddling (irregular, low-paid, temporary) were economically necessary and were done (usually by men) in order to support household incomes and to preserve self-respect. Fiddly work was distributed through local social networks which allowed a minority to maintain an involvement with work culture and to avoid some of the worst material and social psychological consequences of unemployment. Thus fiddly jobs in sub-contracted and other sectors of casualised work are part of a survival strategy through which some people develop alternative ways of working in the face of restricted avenues for legitimate employment and a system of benefits which failed to meet people&s material needs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)507-530
Number of pages24
JournalWork Employment & Society
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

unemployment
work culture
psychological consequences
survival strategy
household income
social effects
working class
qualitative method
morality
respect
social network
rhetoric
welfare
minority
Society
Values
Minorities
Underclass
Social networks
Unemployment

Cite this

@article{633d12e8e9e24ad49d78101a9f803984,
title = "Fiddly Jobs, Undeclared Work and the Something for Nothing Society",
abstract = "Whilst it may be easy to dismiss ideological diatribes about 'a something for nothing society' as empty rhetoric, there are relatively few recent studies with which to assess claims about 'benefit scroungers' and 'dole fiddlers'. Qualitative methods were employed to explore the ways in which some working-class people in an economically depressed locality did 'fiddly jobs' (i.e. working 'undeclared' whilst in receipt of unemployment benefits). The research explored the motivations underpinning fiddly work and the normative values surrounding it. Informants expressed a clear and conservative morality which stood at odds with descriptions of a 'welfare underclass' or 'dependency culture': most common types of fiddling (irregular, low-paid, temporary) were economically necessary and were done (usually by men) in order to support household incomes and to preserve self-respect. Fiddly work was distributed through local social networks which allowed a minority to maintain an involvement with work culture and to avoid some of the worst material and social psychological consequences of unemployment. Thus fiddly jobs in sub-contracted and other sectors of casualised work are part of a survival strategy through which some people develop alternative ways of working in the face of restricted avenues for legitimate employment and a system of benefits which failed to meet people&s material needs.",
author = "Robert MacDonald",
year = "1994",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/095001709484002",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "507--530",
journal = "Work, Employment and Society",
issn = "0950-0170",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Fiddly Jobs, Undeclared Work and the Something for Nothing Society. / MacDonald, Robert.

In: Work Employment & Society, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.12.1994, p. 507-530.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fiddly Jobs, Undeclared Work and the Something for Nothing Society

AU - MacDonald, Robert

PY - 1994/12/1

Y1 - 1994/12/1

N2 - Whilst it may be easy to dismiss ideological diatribes about 'a something for nothing society' as empty rhetoric, there are relatively few recent studies with which to assess claims about 'benefit scroungers' and 'dole fiddlers'. Qualitative methods were employed to explore the ways in which some working-class people in an economically depressed locality did 'fiddly jobs' (i.e. working 'undeclared' whilst in receipt of unemployment benefits). The research explored the motivations underpinning fiddly work and the normative values surrounding it. Informants expressed a clear and conservative morality which stood at odds with descriptions of a 'welfare underclass' or 'dependency culture': most common types of fiddling (irregular, low-paid, temporary) were economically necessary and were done (usually by men) in order to support household incomes and to preserve self-respect. Fiddly work was distributed through local social networks which allowed a minority to maintain an involvement with work culture and to avoid some of the worst material and social psychological consequences of unemployment. Thus fiddly jobs in sub-contracted and other sectors of casualised work are part of a survival strategy through which some people develop alternative ways of working in the face of restricted avenues for legitimate employment and a system of benefits which failed to meet people&s material needs.

AB - Whilst it may be easy to dismiss ideological diatribes about 'a something for nothing society' as empty rhetoric, there are relatively few recent studies with which to assess claims about 'benefit scroungers' and 'dole fiddlers'. Qualitative methods were employed to explore the ways in which some working-class people in an economically depressed locality did 'fiddly jobs' (i.e. working 'undeclared' whilst in receipt of unemployment benefits). The research explored the motivations underpinning fiddly work and the normative values surrounding it. Informants expressed a clear and conservative morality which stood at odds with descriptions of a 'welfare underclass' or 'dependency culture': most common types of fiddling (irregular, low-paid, temporary) were economically necessary and were done (usually by men) in order to support household incomes and to preserve self-respect. Fiddly work was distributed through local social networks which allowed a minority to maintain an involvement with work culture and to avoid some of the worst material and social psychological consequences of unemployment. Thus fiddly jobs in sub-contracted and other sectors of casualised work are part of a survival strategy through which some people develop alternative ways of working in the face of restricted avenues for legitimate employment and a system of benefits which failed to meet people&s material needs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965573350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/095001709484002

DO - 10.1177/095001709484002

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 507

EP - 530

JO - Work, Employment and Society

JF - Work, Employment and Society

SN - 0950-0170

IS - 4

ER -